JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Construction, maf, colors and not least the weight.
Cons:For years he has none.
Opinion:Objective bought to use it with the canon 5D old, I use it every now and then, when I want to review the colors of the film, from a lot of satisfaction, warm colors and a fantastic definition to all the focal points, at least my specimen. You can compare it almost to an L series, the opening f3.5-4.5 becomes very useful in places not bright enough and even at the opening the shot is sharp enough, if found at a decent price I recommend even just to try a vintage lens. I'm certainly not going to sell it, i'm holding it tight. The only new lack of stabilizer, vote 10
Pros:Good construction, excellent sharpness up to short focal 70 / 80mm, used price.
Cons:slight loss of sharpness at focal lengths exceeding 80mm
Opinion:Good construction, excellent sharpness up to focal 80 then becomes a bit soft, I used it in the 5d Mk1 and gave me a lot of satisfaction excellent color quality no distortion and vignetting even at full aperture, a lens that in relation to the price of ' Today's used is definitely worth buying for both ff and aps, rating 9.3 in my opinion!
Pros:focal range (on FF it is a good all-rounder); compactness, fast and precise focus; sufficient close-up capacity at the major focal length
Cons:if we really want to find the brightness and the lack of stabilizer
Opinion:I state that the following is related to the first version, produced in Japan up to 2000 and with 5 blades of the diaphragm, since there is also a 28-105 3.5-4.5 USM II produced from 2000 to 2010 in Taiwan and with 7 blades diaphragm. In my hobby activity of small photographic repairs, I had this lens in my hands and I took the opportunity to do some test shots. Mounted on APS 18Mpx, despite the dated project and amateur address, has behaved very well; just looking at 100% I could see a slight less sharpness than the good 18-55IS in the central areas, just more evident and with a little 'color edge. One can therefore think that on non-hyperdense FF the yield can be even better, which, combined with the low price on the used market, could make it a valid all-round for those who do not need large openings.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
