|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on April 01, 2019 Pros: Compactness, adjustable screen, price, connectivity, simplicity of use, image quality Cons: Only 9 Viewfinder Autofocus points Opinion: I have been Using this camera for a few months and am incredibly pleased with the purchase. Extremely comfortable, portable and easy to use even for a novice, it allows you to achieve excellent results comparable to even higher-end cameras. The Only flaw in the viewfinder autofocus points, which can be tight after a while ' use, but the 43 points in live view Allievano a bit ' this problem. A Best Buy absolutely, both for beginners and for those who want a secondary body light and not expensive but able to give a few satisfactions |
 | sent on December 12, 2018 Pros: Autofocus, compactness, decent ISO, adjustable screen, perfect app, battery life, built-in microphone finicchio Cons: Not excellent grip in vertical requires Batterygrip Opinion: Excellent reflex in relation to the dimensions, mounts the sensor of the 80d, advanced features among canon medium level, exposure compensation and noise correction software activatable Good, the app is perfect with remote view from the mobile phone in FULLHD 60fps, mode Full scenes for every occasion, video compartment to be not bad canon, does not have many settings for dynamic range, OK and useful microphone input and HDMI output for video especially for YouTube |
  | sent on November 12, 2018 Pros: Small size and weight while with comfortable grip; comfortable and highly defined tipper touch screen; sensor close to the competition; dual pixels. Cons: In diaphragm priority, often too long a time that leads to moves. Opinion: I'm going to be an amateur photographer at the first dslr, coming from an RX100 thanks to which I learned the basics of photography. I tried to inform myself as much as possible, before deciding which machine (and at the same time which system) to bet on. The choice fell on the 200D because: 1) it has a decent portability, as far as possible in the reflex field. 2) the 24mpx sensor is comparable to the competition (photonstophotos, comparison with Nikon D5600 and Sony A6500: http://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Canon%20EOS%20200D,Nikon%20D5600,Sony%20ILCE-6500) and is the same as the older APSC sisters; in post-production, important recoveries of underexposed shots are possible. 3) the double autofocus system seems to me balanced for the price range, with "decent" lighting the 9 points via OVF (cross center) work properly; for more critical situations I resort to the Dual Pixel via Live View. For portraits, there is the face detection function. 4) Canon offers objectives, see STM, excellent for my needs, for quality, price and size, not to mention the vast array of EF and EFS already present both new and used. 5) the controls are well disposed and quick to implement; the single ring combination + service buttons (the ISO button, the Q button that can be used for exposure compensation and the Av button whose function varies from mode to mode) will not be as efficient as the multiple rings but at the same time does not make me feel limited and allows me to adjust everything without taking my eye off the viewfinder. Negative notes? the grip sometimes a little creaky when combined with heavy targetss (plastic fault), and the priority mode of unusable diaphragms: the machine, often and willingly, resorts to too long times with consequent photos moved to be binned. Fortunately, the M + auto ISO mode solves every problem: you set times and iris opening depending on the type of photo, if necessary you set an exposure compensation and leave the optimal ISO value to the cold calculations of the machine... you can still change it with the dedicated button. The touch screen "remembers" the last item selected before turning off; selecting the exposure compensation, the Q button (in addition to activating the screen) becomes a quick button for selecting the same, which can then be varied with the usual wheel. |
 | sent on September 19, 2018 Pros: Ergonomics, adjustable display, very simple menu, battery life, excellent image quality, quality/price ratio to consider. Cons: Only 9 focus points, high noise at high ISO, autofocus not foolproof. Opinion: Bought a few months ago, in which it was used intensely. Very intuitive and easy to understand menu. Very light and comfortable to wear, perhaps a little too small for those who have important hands, but in this regard it is possible to equip it with a battery grip and the problem will fade. The adjustable display makes it suitable for a little more complicated shots, and the quality of the images in RAW is really exceptional. The battery seems endless, even after days of intense use. Cons There is a really very limited number of focus points, but being an entry level and still having other particularly good features, I would say you can stay there. It holds bad at high ISO, so I recommend to equip it with a bright lens to remedy the problem. Recommended for those who want to start taking pictures and looking for a camera not too expensive that still offers important results. |
user157612  | sent on July 02, 2018 Pros: Adjustable Display and touchscreen, battery life, ergonomics Cons: Autofocus Opinion: Coming from Canon EOS 1300d, the 200D was a very pleasant upgrade. The camera is extremely portable and the adjustable touchscreen display is very convenient when looking for "particular" shots or if you want to be quick to change settings. The image quality on-camera is good but drops slightly when you use software for post production. Combined with a fixed lens (e.g. like me 35mm) or "pancakes", the maximum ergonomic qualities are enhanced. Excellent battery life, the discharge is even in long shooting sessions. Unfortunately scarce the 9 points of autofocus to viewfinder; To get the best results you need to use the Live View with the touch screen focus. Overall it is a "smart" reflex, ideal for those who (like me) are beginners because its operation is almost comparable to that of a smartphone. |
  | sent on April 30, 2018 Pros: Medium/high ISO performance, ergonomics, quality of RAW files, swiveling, touch display and battery life. Cons: Has no micro AF in the room. Only 9 AF points in viewfinder. Often low-quality JPEG files. Opinion: Used as a new outlet in place of 1300D only because as I raised the ISO produced files that were disastrous this 200 d proved to be fast and reliable and with an APS-C sensor. Nice and convenient display full pivotal adjustment and full touch, good viewfinder. Quick to ignite and become operational. With quality optics produces RAW files consistently good while regardless of the objective used if you shoot in JPEG file quality collapses if shooting conditions are less than ideal. The auto focus is perfect in live view while in the viewfinder the different points from the Central sometimes are misfiring. Ultimately a great camera for photo amateurs even demanding. Highly recommended as entry level of quality for those who want to stay in the mirrorless reflex rather than on most modern systems both APS-C m4/3. |
 | sent on January 12, 2018 Pros: Dimensions. Adjustable display. Wifi. Cons: Autofocus. Price Opinion: Fantastic to always carry with you with the 24mm pancake is the top. I like the ability to instantly transfer photos via Wi-Fi to your smartphone. Basic autofocus can not be photographed in the theater in the dark suffers a lot. On the other hand is not a camera for pro or semipro use even if you can pull out good photos with the right lenses. Price for me exaggerated for the level of the car. For me it should cost no more than 499 € in kit with 18-55. |
 | sent on September 26, 2017 Pros: AF speed, adjustable screen, high RAW recovery Cons: small for those with big hands, few autofocus points for those who need it by subject type.rn Opinion: I just have this, for me, jewelery.rnThe size is tending to the little one. I do not know if Canon has made this choice to get closer to the mirrorless but as far as I'm concerned, I find it an ideal solution for those who like me in old school do not like live view and want very portable camera.rn small, but essential and most useful ones and in the entry level style of always.rnAF fast and very silent shutter. rnSee not to suffer very high ISO noise but the use is still limited.rn i am convinced that the next generation operating system and sensor will make a difference.rnrnrn rn |
 | sent on August 11, 2017 Pros: Fluidity and response of the touchscreen, touchable touch monitor, compact size, image quality, improved ergonomics, value for money / performance. Cons: Poor buffer, only 9 AF points (Optical Viewfinder) Opinion: I bought this machine to replace the EOS100D. The 200D has 100D only the compact dimensions and the 9 AF points (optical viewfinder only) but, for the rest, it's a totally new machine.rnThe design quality and the ' assembling are great for an entry level of this price. The body now offers a more pronounced handle with the classic rubber coating of larger size reflexes, resulting in improved grip. The touch is less "plasticised" and more solid than 100D.rn. • The 200D adopts the latest 24.2MPX Apsc sensor (same as mounted on 80D); therefore, as ISO and IQ holdings we are at very high levels since it is at the moment the best Apsc Canon sensor. Compared to the old 18mpx, I confirm there is a noticeable improvement in high ISO holding. The images have a finer and homogeneous grain, and are easier to process in post-production. Shots can be used up to 1600 iso, but thereyou can also push it to 3200/6400 iso (if properly exposed and without heavy recovery) but you need to resize them to decrease digital noise. As for the famous "dynamic range" (which I use with a lot of parsimony, especially on an APSC sensor), I must say that recovery on shadows and blacks is very good. On the other hand, I find it very easy to "burn" the high lights and when this happens, the recovery becomes impossible.rn • The AF from the optical viewfinder is precise and responsive, and I find it better than the 100D.rn as in the model previous, even the 200D is penalized by only 9 AF points (by optical viewfinder). The points become 49 in LV.rn mode. As for the touch screen, I have to say that I have quickly adapted to using the commands in this mode as well as navigating faster within the menu. Always talking about menus, you can now choose between two types of navigation: rn "Mode%3B wizard "with wizard information that appears on every screen and rn" Standard Mode "the classic one that we find on the other EOS.rnThe touch screen is fast in scrolling and precise in touch response. Rn MAF with touchscreen is ideal for resuming static subjects , so I can focus on the desired detail.For moving subjects I have not used it yet ... I'm going to complete the review as soon as I can test it for good It's very positive that the touch does not trigger micromax, as opposed to the pressure on the shutter button. I tried to shoot with very long shutter speeds (even more than 10 inches), resulting in excellent sharpness results. No Front / Back Focus problem with proprietary optics (EF and EF-S), or third-party (Sigma 180mm f / 2.8 macro and Tamron 15 / 30mm f2.8). Only with the Tamron 150-600mm G2 I had to fix (by dock) a light front fo cus by adjusting the lens to -4rn • rnCon l%26 # 39; adoption of the new Digic 7 processor, I would have expected to find a better buffer ... rnScatting in Raw or Raw + Jpeg L, you can make 5 shots with a rapid burst, then the buffer stops suddenly several seconds. This is done to allow you to write files you just captured on the memory card. In certain circumstances, it will definitely turn into a limit ... shame, because even just 2-3 more Raw, and a faster writing time, could have made a difference. The situation improves by jumping into Jpeg (L). In this regard, I suggest that you pay attention to the memory card's choice, as performance can vary considerably. After trying out several cards, the one that gave me the best results was the Sandisk Extreme PRO 32GB 95MB / s class 10 / U3 / V30. rnInternet you will find several comparative tests and almost all confirm the superior performance of this card. rn • The battery life (LP-E17) is good andnow allows you to get a fair amount of shots, in line with other larger Dslrs. rnCanon declares 840 optical viewpoints and 290 with LV, and I can confirm that it is fairly reliable. rnThe reflex can not be reloaded via USB ... now it is understood that Canon has no interest in implementing this useful feature.rn • rnSe you you liked the 100D, the 200D will not disappoint you, indeed ... it will not bother you even the upper Apsc reflexes, because the small EOS will allow you to get the same image quality. Of course, you have to accept the compromise of having only 9 AF points as a viewfinder, but if you use only one active AF point in 99% of the situations (I do not like AF mode ...), you will get used to it quickly you will forgive this limitation.rnThe compact size and lightness, the touchscreen swivel monitor, a valued and modern 24.2mpx sensor, an infinite optical park, connectsWi-Fi and much more ... at a lower price than a mid / high bandwidth smartphone. What do you want more ?? ;) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
