JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Body, double ring, the second screen, battery life.
Cons:Compared to recent SLRs, many. But when it was released it was like having a Ferrari
Opinion:Machine from the robust and solid body. He feels it is a lady reflex. I possess since 2004 and has never betrayed me, in any condition. This is not an entry level but something more. Obviously now the technical limitations are felt heavily. The noise at high iso is highly visible already to 800, if we put it in extension (ie 3200) even in good external light conditions, the noise is really much. The AF works very well, quickly and accurately in optimal situations, but with little light, even that starts to limp. In addition to this there is the screen that is really ridiculous. Small and very poorly defined. Sometimes it seems to them that it is coming a nice sharp picture and then, you realize that the computer is moved or blurry. Unfortunately, we speak of a machine of many years ago, and in electronics are centuries. However, still it gives many joys if we know a little 'do. I will not never part. Now I'm considering another camera body, but my will to my 10dside, faithful friend of holidays, workshops and turn. rn
Pros:Machine body really solid, ergonomics, used price, quality sensor
Cons:Slow photo playback, high iso noise, tiny screen
Opinion:The 10D is a great camera in relation to age, body-solid machine from professional, excellent ergonomics that makes it pleasant to hold. The 6.3 megapixel sensor produces excellent photos, the council as a second body, for those who want to make the leap into the world and reflex to photograph in difficult or "dirty".
Pros:Price of used (found last week for 160 € including excellent lens Tokina 19-39 f: 3.5-4.5), CF, well built, quality immafine respectable despite 11 years of age.
Cons:screen ridiculous both in size and resolution, already heavy noise above 500 iso.
Opinion:I was looking for a semipro SLR for use with a homemade pinhole lens and having already 6D, 1DII, 50D and 60D was aiming for something cheap, I was undecided between a 400D and a 350D when I imbato in an announcement on the internet of this machine accompanied by excellent lens Tokina really am ... all at a price of 100 € less than the bodies of the younger sisters of Canon. the 10D looks quite good in spite of the age, is ergonomic, easy to handle and nice sturdy. the rendered image is at high levels, and the files are well lavorabili.rnla battery still holds fairly well. you should not work more than 500 iso otherwise the noise becomes unmanageable. the monitor is really dated and it shows, very low definition and low in contrast. in short, is a camera that was clearly outclassed by the later versions but unfounded ago 'still a terrible figure.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
