Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.7 : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews

What do you think?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 259000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Pamar5

sent on 20 Novembre 2025

Pros: AF, weight, size, lens hood, metal mount, image rendering.

Cons: For the price nothing at all.

Opinion: I've owned this lens for a few weeks now. I was in doubt whether to take this or something even brighter for portraits. In the end, since it is not my main genre, I opted for this one, also given the price, and then eventually changed. I must say that never has a purchase been more apt. The blur is good and pleasant. Negligible weight and size. Impeccable construction. It has no metal parts but gives an impression of solidity. The attachment is made of metal. Ready and quiet autofocus. No aperture ring but for me it is not a limit. No stabilization but I use it on a body with IBIS. In short, for the ridiculous cost I find only advantages. Also included is the lens hood. The image rendering is very good, even at the edges almost perfect at full aperture, perfect by closing a little. Super recommended. I was in doubt given the price, now I would buy it with my eyes closed. Mark

Beato Angelico

sent on 26 Giugno 2025

Pros: Small, light, great optical quality, bright, cheap, nice bokeh, lens hood included

Cons: Just to put a con: it is not tropicalized, but for a portrait fixture I doubt it will ever be a problem

Opinion: Taken as a portrait fixum for my Nikon APSC, I can only praise this lens: compact and light, it is absolutely not a problem to always carry it with you, excellent optical quality, always sharp even at full aperture, very bright, it allows you to have a beautiful blur. In addition to all these qualities, Viltrox sells the lens for 200 euros, with lens hood included, a price that I would say is more than fair. The only defect I could mention is the absence of tropicalization, but for this type of lens and at this price I would not consider it a real defect. In the Nikon Z APSC system it has practically no rivals in the same price range (if you want to spend more there is the Sigma). Too bad Nikon doesn't have a stabilized body, otherwise it would be even more fun to shoot with this little gem. Rating 9.5

Giulianophoto

sent on 21 Novembre 2024

Pros: Is it worth much more than what it costs, or are the other lenses worth less than what they cost. Brava viltrox

Cons: Aperture ring missing, but you can't have it all.

Opinion: For what it costs it's a best buy. Very sharp even at full aperture, excellent boken (but not excellent), very light, MAF ring that is better than some nikkor I have from 2k, it is not tropicalized but having a spartan construction without many rings the possibilities of infiltration are minimal, lens hood perhaps a little small, I will reserve the right to test it in backlight. With the XPRO2 the tiny size does not hide the OVF, the blur from the first tests done is not exceptional but very good, pasty just right. A perspective for me that is worth much more than the 169 euros I paid for it new. Perfect for portraiture but also reportage being very discreet. Highly recommended

Sigmarco

sent on 30 Ottobre 2024

Pros: All

Cons: Nothing

Opinion: I'll be brief: it's small, light, sharp and has a powerful autofocus. If we really want to bring out some defects we can mention the minimum focusing distance which is, as usual for Viltrox, "far" and the lack of tropicalization, but for 180-200€ it seems really dishonest to list them as defects. In fact, I used it during an entire cycling event, to put it to the whip and it didn't disappoint me at all, on the contrary! (see photos in my gallery to change your mind or go to my @girosnap page and watch the Salvo race)

Luchis

sent on 04 Ottobre 2024

Pros: Economic. Small. Light. Bright. Very well made. He takes beautiful photos.

Cons: The lens hood reaches the end of its stroke but does not lock with a click, at least in this one it is like this I don't know if I had bad luck or they are all like that. Some uncertainty to focus in critical light conditions.

Opinion: It is part of Viltrox's "Air" series along with the 2.8/20mm and 2.5/40mm. Similar lenses in aesthetics, weight and size, but the 56mm is the only one for APS-C and is the brightest. 84mm equivalent, attached to the Z30 does not look out of place looks like the kit lens. Matte plastic and rough to the touch looks good quality. Metal bayonet (nowadays it must be specified because plastic is rampant) and usb-c connector. It does not have a rear seal, it is not protected from rain and bad weather. 56mm filters. The version for Nikon Z is different from the one for Fujifilm or Sony (the one in the photo to be clear) it is nicer. Manual focusing is facilitated by an excellent voluminous and well-frictioned ring nut. Minimum distance of maf 55cm is not bad for an 84mm although equivalent. Indeed in critical light conditions it can go into crisis but nothing dramatic, neither more nor less than the other two lenses in the kit the 16-50 and the 50-250. It certainly offers much more than what it costs, recommended.

MassiCricco

sent on 04 Ottobre 2024

Pros: Small footprint, light weight, optical design (4 ED lenses and 3 HR), bokeh (9-blade rounded diaphragm), quality of materials, USB-C socket for firmware update, price, lens hood included

Cons: Autofocus a bit slow in low light conditions

Opinion: A small jewel of Chinese technology, offered at a ridiculous price compared to the most titled competition. On my Nikon Z50 it fits perfectly with minimal footprint and weight. Excellent sharpness even at T.A. (f/1.7) in the center, nice bokeh, thanks to the 9-blade diaphragm. Despite being proposed as an entry-level lens, the optical scheme is respectable with 4 ED "Low dispersion lenses" and 3 "High refractive index" lenses. Good quality metal bayonet with USB-C socket for any firmware updates and lens hood that, even folded, allows easy manual MF. The only flaw, autofocus is a bit slow in poor lighting conditions, but perfectly manageable. Rating 9.5-10

Anrea1

sent on 18 Agosto 2024

Pros: Size, weight, price, image quality.

Cons: Maybe maybe a little slow in the first focus.

Opinion: Speaking of a lens that I paid less than 170 euros I could say a lot of yield with very little expense, and in fact it is so. Used in the evening at the amusement park I have very sharp portraits with wonderful blur. Used in the floor for sports photos (light at the minimum terms f 2.0) fast times and more than satisfactory photos. I noticed that it struggles a bit to focus in low light, and I realized that you have to anticipate the shot by half a second and the burst takes it home. I was struck by the quality of the image, the colors it restores are beautiful for me. I mount it on fuji x-t20 and I would not remove it anymore except that I use wider lenses. Curious to try the 20 mm. Well done Viltrox.

Panta17

sent on 06 Maggio 2024

Pros: Price-performance

Cons: None for the cost

Opinion: Socket to complete my nikon 16-50 and 50-250 kit with a bright lens and without spending a fortune, quite the contrary. The image quality is very good, the autofocus works well (obviously less well in low light conditions, but ok), the materials and solidity are very good and in the package they also provide you with the lens hood and a small lens mount. Type c is also present for updates.