Tamron AF 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews
Lenses
Lenses Tamron
Tamron AF 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD

Reviews

What do you think?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 259000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Mgnello

sent on 10 Marzo 2020

Pros: Great everything to do, from wide angle to canvases, all in a backpack.

Cons: It's a little dark, but for what he does, it's... the VC is a bit noisy but I got used to...

Opinion: I have this lens since 2011 and I have to say that I made him at least 20,000 photos, 95% are all OK the rest 5% are wrong photos because of me and the lens... The wrap-wrapped focus is not precise, making two three photos per subject 2 out of three are always good, if not three out of three, every now and then it is wrong... And it simply takes, and a whole do that has solved so many Excursions, you need a lot of light to have good results. During the day you have a lot of fun you always have all the Focals available, and I after the PP I always brought home good results.... In the evening and better to carry the trepiede if you want to shoot over 150 mm. below 150 mm. and you can still shoot freehand... If you photograph in the evening in the premises, a flash and useful his photo machine is great but over 24 mm. So with the Flash and great at all focal points, but from 24 mm. onward... Without exaggeration you can not expect knockout photos, but basically take pictures that for a non-professional photographer can be satisfied, now given his Age in the used you find it little, and for those who start life as a photographer and want to spend little I recommend it , it is better to take it and have fun for many years.... A big greeting to everyone... (MGNELLO)

Giamba55

sent on 08 Febbraio 2015

Pros: Versatility and good performance.

Cons: A little 'dark, loses definition above 200 mm; derives Zoom in the absence of the block.

Opinion: On the way you avoid changing constantly goal, a real tuttofare.rnNon and 'true that sucks like quality because in the tests more' severe proved on average exceeds its objectives in both Nikon kit that Canon.rnHo found annoying drift Zoom ( stretches when and 'downwards without block activated) while I never had problems there' speed it 'precision in focus that, combined with my Nikon D7100 - never sbagliato.rnE' obvious that there is comparison with lenses of higher level where the difference in quality and 'notevole.rnrn

Borzip

sent on 08 Febbraio 2015

Pros: is a handyman! Good stabilizer.

Cons: Dark, focus noisy and not precise.

Opinion: I bought this lens aware of little brightness 3.5-6.3, but is aware that a handyman! RnQuando are on vacation I take him aware not to take pictures in low light situations, but I have a responsibility to get behind goals expensive series L.rnProprio because when I'm on vacation I want to be more carefree I combined with an old 20D, which all in all 8 megapixels for a holiday or for any private photographs that goes bene.rnOvviamente for demanding photo shoot outside the FF and L series that are definitely another level.

Sarosaggio

sent on 19 Ottobre 2014

Pros: versatile, stabilized

Cons: quality

Opinion: it was my first lens when I started, and not having so many claims, I thought it was spectacular ..... did everything. rnPoi of course it goes on you grow, and you realize that the quality is not at best a bit dark ... etc. Conclusion, on a beautiful day, in a picnic with friends, you're more free, and also satisfaction, but do not go beyond.

Bertuning

sent on 23 Ottobre 2013

Pros: He does everything, stabilized, contrasted

Cons: focus

Opinion: If you want to carry around a single lens, or you want to get a result at 270 firm without necessarily spending money on a 300af-s, this is the right lens, a little flaw in focusing slow and noisy. Personally I preferred the lens cole younger USD because the lenses are of better quality and give more vivid picture, which I like more. Ideal as a lens to shoot in good light.

Estroverzia

sent on 13 Settembre 2013

Pros: Versatility - A variation always come out with one goal

Cons: Pitch dark in many situations, the great stabilizer does not work miracles - up from 200 the image quality becomes a mirage

Opinion: When I took it seemed like a good choice, in hindsight ... is convenient because it allowed me many times to go out without purse, and switch to a landscape, to shoot a bird on a tree in 1 second, but the compromises are many: it is bright, with little light in my hand is almost always been impossible to take pictures freehand, l is is great, in my hand (very firm) compensates for 3 stops, but does not do miracles. The focus is lentina, but acceptable condition No normal, low-light and moving subjects (in particular the focal length of 200-270) is ... I would say eccentric ... because you never know who will combine. Until around 150 mm overall image quality (sharpness, vignettaura, distortion, the difference between corner and center, c) is more acceptable and less homogeneous, more and better standard of classical canon 18-55 etc. .... but above this focal the edges are impastatissimi, and dark, and also in the center, there is not much dettaglio.rnIN CONCLUSION my first picture I made with him, but I would not lor advice, take 2 lenses if you want a hike so great, canon 15-85 and 70-200 f4 if you want long distances, canon 10-22 and 24-105 if you love landscapes and reportage, or cm ², avoid long trips.

Alessiolupo

sent on 13 Aprile 2013

Pros: Versatile, practical, handyman and assistance Polyphoto really efficienternrnrn

Cons: is useless, AF inaccurate, very noisy and not particularly focuses on it.

Opinion: Finding myself using this lens despite having liked to have a view all, I realize that it's no use! I no longer take off and put other goals but with this I can not do anything. It's not perfect, nor much less clear and stable is really not very functional. I made a bad purchase I do not know the other versions but this is the worst!

Giangisluca

sent on 23 Marzo 2013

Pros: Versatile, allows you to carry around a single lens (if you do not have too many claims)

Cons: Image quality, focus is not always perfect and noisy.

Opinion: It 'was my first lens on my first digital SLR camera. I've used it a lot and for a long time, often postponing his "retirement." This lens I have read a lot and found many differing opinions and many defects are not always seen by all or all in the same way as if you were speaking of different perspectives. I can personally say that, under ideal light, has offered good results, while suffering from a focus noisy and not always accurate. Failure possibility of Full Time MF has not been helpful. Certainly allowed me to travel "light", always with me a wide angle and a telephoto in a single lens.

Reviews
Lenses
Lenses Tamron
Tamron AF 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD