| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
  | sent on 16 Agosto 2024 Pros: Cost, electronic viewfinder, AF, battery life Cons: produces somewhat weak images, plasticky body, so-so ISO tightness Opinion: Taken to replace my trusty A290, it has never fascinated me. I kept it a couple of years before moving to the A7 (another world). I'm not saying that the images it produces are bad, but compared to the A290 they seem to lack "energy", I don't know how to put it better. Probably a lack of contrast and saturation that makes them appear "rubbery" to me. For the rest it is a decent machine, even if clearly cheap (the plastic filler neck is just a fall in style). In its favor (at least for me) the electronic viewfinder, which provides a series of useful functions including focus peaking very useful for those who like to shoot in all manual. The battery life is excellent and the AF is good. The ISO seal, bah. A little better than the A290 but not by much, let's say that you shoot quietly up to 400 ISO, then the noise becomes intrusive especially in the shadowy areas where there is also a lot of chromatic noise. Generally it didn't impress me, even if with the right lenses some good photos could always come out. Today it can be found used for just over 100 euros, certainly at that price it could also be considered as the first camera to practice photography. |
 | sent on 10 Marzo 2019 Pros: Handle, controls, EVF viewfinder, battery, image quality. Cons: Video a little underlie, only enough display, plastic nozzle, Mount attack. Opinion: It's the machine I started with, replaced by a6000. Of this machine I regret essentially the erognomy and the grip, firm and solid, of another level compared to that of the small a6000. However compared to this, the A58 has the poor video compartment (which in 30fps with at quite slow) usually Sony always does a good job from this point of view. Always great instead the quality of image and the RAW you can work really well. The electronic viewfinder is the plus that the diatingue from the classic reflex, or you love it or you hate it. Plastic nozzle never gave me problems, however it is more of a psychological limit to have it. The real problem that has led me to replace it with the a6000 is the unfortunate destiny that is having the attack on Mount, which gives little confidence to invest in quality lenses for this body. |
 | sent on 29 Gennaio 2019 Pros: Value for money, has a lot of features, electronic viewfinder, focus peacking, body stabilized machine, shock resistant, good battery life. Cons: Since it is an entry level you can hardly use it in a light environment if you do not match an F 1.8 lens, much less you can shoot in the evening, battery life long exposures. Opinion: His only problem is not to be called canon... is a great machine for the price that you find probably higher than the competitors entry level canon/Nikon. I used it sporadically for a year and a half just automatically and pulled out some nice photos. After taking a course in photography has become the normal extension of my arm and I began to appreciate its versatility and the excellent bill (I fell from the tripod and did not make a scratch while the lens supplied 18-55 has reported a simple Dent but continues to work to perfection). I love the EVF, you have all the information you need without looking in the live view and you have a fairly truthful preview of the final result of the shot. To photograph indoors you need a bright lens. To my surprise it snaps up to 1600 ISO without major problems and although I hardly push it to 3200 ISO If you expose well the files are not bad at all. Over the 3200 iso pixels seem crazy and you have a real explosion of the same. I really appreciate the fact that it has the focus peacking also usable by viewfinder, as they often use old vintage lenses without autofocus; For the same reason it is also very useful the stabilizer directly on the machine body. The battery really lasts as long as you make lengthy exposures in this case it runs out pretty quickly, but I think it's a bit of a problem for all the entrylevels. I highly recommend the purchase unless not have the intention to go after a full frame, unfortunately Sony only makes a model of SLR FF and costs a lot but if you do not have money problems I would definitely recommend Sony in some ways is a step Forward to the others. |
 | sent on 05 Gennaio 2018 Pros: Intuitive, it has everything in its low price Cons: In closed environments the photos are very noisy, slow to save the image even with the latest sd Opinion: My first SLR to learn and I enjoyed and taught a lot, I will soon be going to the sister a77 mk2 but the a58 is still a nice object to learn! RnA bit 'noisy shooting and the engine of focus in the lens of series, but at 3-400 € you can not 'ask for better ... intuitive and customizable, even in automatic mode the software works well churning out fantastic photos. |
  | sent on 17 Settembre 2017 Pros: Price-quality ratio, button layout, electronic viewfinder, Minolta Optical Use Cons: Electronic viewfinder, low ISO seal, expensive original optics, difficult passage to higher class ... Opinion: The Sony a58 delivers great satisfaction for being an entry level, the value for money is great! RnFor fortune and unfortunately it has the electronic viewfinder, the pros: you can see the shutter before you press the button, all the info and options that you it is also possible to set it during shooting, unfortunately the electronic viewfinder is not performing as an optical one. The ergonomics of the buttons is not equal, it adjusts everything without disconnecting the eye from the viewfinder, it is not new but you also get used to the traditional ... rnThe possibility of using low-cost Minolta optics with all-in-line quality or higher than the car body, the originals cost really too! rnThe top step has no choice, the a77ii ... but despite the fact that its high quality does not solve the problems of the iso hold that 800 passes to 1600 at most, the switch to ff instead costs the exchange of the aps optics and an investment also very burdensome and obligatory, or the old a99 or oppur and the a99ii to the modest digit of otre 3600%26euro; .rnAf is not the best, not very fast and very often inaccurate, except in face recognition, a very useful feature that focuses on the faces framed.rnChicca is the possibility in manual focus to have a coloring tool edges when focused, with the option of choosing between white and red in the yellow, thanks to which I could make good focus in the macros even without the possibility of magnifying the framed image ... rnThe sensor, 20 sec are not a few, the image quality is good especially at 100 iso, only note, following some long exposures (in the order of 90 seconds) my sensor has burned ... unfortunately .. rnInsomma if there is no big pretension and maybe the desire to go to ff, the Sony a58 has nothing to envy to other machines, still i would recommend it to neophyte, you can find it again on amazon or the great offers on ebay ... rnBuona light |
 | sent on 30 Gennaio 2017 Pros: Build quality above average and manageability, functionality, performance for an entry-level camera, excellent battery life, 15 points MF, excellent electronic viewfinder Cons: AF not very fast and not always accurate, embarrassing LCD screen, burst in RAW because of the limited buffer. Opinion: It 'a good car to start, as a better quality of canon entry and on par with Nikon. Well kept the ISO up to 1600, in addition you have to work at pp. The main problem are perhaps the optical available that are less than the Canon / Nikon and more expensive, even for the brands compatible and consequently even less in used choice. |
user76622
 | sent on 07 Novembre 2015 Pros: Excellent overall quality for the price, good battery life, good photos up to ISO 1600 (B also 3200), ease of use and the menu navigation. Cons: Autofocus not always effective if the light is the least poor, the screen unusable in bright light. Opinion: I come from a compact Canon, and find me holding this Sony A58 I opened endless possibilities; the modes A, M, and S are easy to set up and make it really fun to use the machine; auto mode is a good starting point for beginners like me to try to play and then change the automatic settings, but it is also very valid for the pictures taken during such holidays, or out with friends where there you have the time or inclination to set each shooting. The picture quality is excellent up to ISO 1600 and RAW also to 3200, after which they begin to be too noisy. The objective provided in kits, 18-55 DT SAM II is not bad, certainly for a car that costs 349 euros with included lens will not be super sharp and bright, but that's fine as long as you do not have clear ideas to choose perspective suitable for your purpose. The auto focus is perfect with optimal light conditions, but if this is scarce a little 'non always possible to set it on the first try. different types of screen display and viewfinder, from simple image preview to the list of complete information is available in the regulated parameters (convenient in cases where you need a "summary" before a shot). The automatic white balance does a good job in most situations, and also when you need to set it manually, colors are reproduced in a kind and faithful. The Help button displays a brief explanation of the already clear menu functions and configurable options; it is light to carry shoulder and the battery has a life of about 600-800 shots depending on the use made of it, but I managed to even get to 1600 by one Startrail; the tilting screen with live-view is nice, but unfortunately almost unusable in bright light, where you have to rely on the electronic viewfinder, which nonetheless real preview of what you will click. The low resolution of the screen does not allow to see some detailed kingi that will only be visible on the PC screen. There are enough buttons that make it more direct access to various settings without necessarily having to go through the system menu. The menu that many consider complicated to me sounds great, has many voices all divided logically, and he understands the function flight. I find it a versatile machine suitable as first SLR. |
 | sent on 04 Novembre 2015 Pros: Light and handy, long battery life, good electronic viewfinder, Good yield up to 3200, value / price highly competitive, fast autofocus, preview PDC Cons: It does not say Canon / Nikon on body Opinion: I went from a Sony a380 this to58, the leap is heard. Not only for Mpixel more than for me could be less, but to a whole other series of aspettirncome listed in PRO is lighter and more manageable, perhaps less practical for beginning a series of buttons more than the my ex but you soon get used to. The Preview of the PDC (closes the aperture to give a preview in live view of its depth of field in that opening) is a bit 'small and I would have preferred slightly higher, but are finezze.rnLa battery lasts so much the first time I after taking 1000 photos in RAW I still had 66% battery ... doing the math should reach 3000, I do not think you get it but 2500 surpasses them with disinvolturarnil electronic viewfinder is very defined, more screen real but so is used much more than the first ... at least in my casornil first sound you hear in ISO1600, Correggibilissimo also taking direct jpeg using noise reduction. In 3200 ovviemente there more noise but is correggibilissimo shooting in RAW (I have not tried in jpeg sincerely, but the results are definitely better with the RAW JPEG camera) rnCome anticipated just above the key is the preview of the PDC, It does not seem to have the competitors in this price range, which is in my opinion the cherry on top of this Sony.rnSe was a Canon / Nikon would be the most sold in shopping malls, and in any case when someone asks "What starts with ? D3200 or 1200d? " I do not understand why not also assess this entry level Sony, snobbatissima than the other two that will always be good at those prices, but compared to58 to make a fool of. |
user38888
| sent on 16 Febbraio 2015 Pros: Given the price and the band dynamic range = very good, very good color range, detail vote 8.5 out of 10, very easy to handle with a good gripping, from an idea of ??toy and enjoy doing shots, screen viewfinder high detail shots fast 5 fps , AF system rating 8 out of 10, many optical minolta compatible with excellent results, with good detail and screen size, sealing iso truly exceptional, raw files utilizzabilissimi up to ISO 3200 at least remaining in the thought of amateur evolved / moved, very good video with high resolution and detail, internal stabilizer discreet, up to 3 stops recovery (against 4 of the new generations and other brands). weight contenutornCome said remaining within a range of SLR precise and the same release date Cons: AF sometimes non-performance and "snaps", 3-point cross (better than others for the same price), digital viewfinder (subjective), machine very plasticky, of course not Tropicalised Opinion: Just in hand, you turn it ... fun! shoot, shoot and shoot again the machine, fun, fast in the right place to have fun. He felt the plasticosità right away, but the tightness in the hand is very good, does not slip and it "fits" well with dita.rnChi like me shooting with the viewfinder and only 1 in 10 000 with LV, but does not have problems to use LV very simple to set up and use, and in any case even the digital viewfinder is not a problem, in fact I have to say that in some situations it is a pleasure to operate, but it remains at a pentaprism viewfinder. rnPensata to use it right away, so simple then the internal software is built, even those who take a camera for the first time, after a few minutes the uses without difficulty, though, to make a "good" photos it takes a combination well precise rather than the use of only the macchina.rnLo screen are adjustable vertically, is really handy, in case you need to take pictures holding up the machine over the heads of people in a place or event and servesa photo. The weight is very low even if it remains in media.rnrnQuesta is my opinion remain in the range of identified Reflex, cataloged between the entry level (perhaps canon would put between the amateur, a step above) |
 | sent on 22 Dicembre 2014 Pros: Good image quality and pixel "pasty", remains with ISO between 100 and 1600 (over the noise becomes rather present), autofocus valid, electronic viewfinder, compatibility with older Minolta lenses with bayonet type A, the possibility of apply filters and effects to your images instantly JPG (convenient for those who are beginners and want to have fun with effects "creative") without using Photoshop (although the yield is very different, I admit), 15 points of focus , button "help" that runs to help if needed Cons: appearance of noise in low light (I think also depends on the objective of the series), but not tilting screen only "rotating" Opinion: I state that it is my first camera, and therefore are not ferratissimo subject. So I decided to start with a "basic" model but still had a rather high overall quality. The choice fell on this model mainly for two reasons: the first is that I could recycle old Minolta lenses of my father (nothing special but enough to have fun for a moment and take my hand without throwing a lot of money), the second reason is that, for the price range of belonging think there is very little comparable. the sensor 20.1 effective Megapixel performs well, the pixels are very pasty (at high magnification you do not have a sort of mosaic effect on the photo) and the colors are warm. I noticed the appearance of noise with low light environments (churches) or with night photos with long exposures but I think it must be considered that the lens of the series (a "plasticotto" DT 3.5-5.6 / 18-55 SAM II) not really professional even if, in its economy, I must say that also behaves well if there is lightsufficiency, demonstrating a certain speed in focus. The camera body is lightweight and is made of good quality plastic, anti-static and anti-slip. Another thing I'm happy is the electronic viewfinder; these Sony does not have a mirror and an optical viewfinder but it is a mini-LCD display with high definition (pixels are seen) that covers 100% of the field and which incorporates all of the commands that you see on the screen in live-view and all settings that are corrected on the fly while framing. The transition from live-view in the viewfinder is automatic thanks to a proximity sensor that switches power to either display depending on the proximity of the eye to the camera board mirino.rnrnIn substance in question to those who are beginners (creative effects, scene mode, button help) but want a product with a value for money winner (pixels "pasty", 15 AF points, electronic viewfinder) |
 | sent on 20 Settembre 2014 Pros: Excellent yield at ISO 800 1600 good qualita'immagini excellent autofocus module Cons: ISO car not settable on an adjustable limit depending on the needs, flash is not very powerful Opinion: Coming from a Sony A350, the differences are significant, it is certainly more 'than what costa.Ottima dynamic range, I can see in the large display the image as it will be' taken thanks to technology Sony.Gli unique in that I recognized are those reported, insufficient flash and auto ISO setting is not manageable all'utente.Corpo very light that does not tire. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
