Sony NEX-6 : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews

What do you think?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 259000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Mggscr

sent on 11 Ottobre 2020

Pros: I have this camera from May 2019, it is light, well assembled and of good overall quality. Once the optics kit is replaced the camera gives the best of itself.

Cons: For amateur use no cons. Only neo ,in raw files, is present (in my opinion) a dominant magenta.

Opinion: As an amateur this camera has almost everything I need, I use it with the 18-135 sony and with a 30 f1.4 sigma, and I'm satisfied with it. The only mole, in my opinion, in raw files known a dominant magenta that of course in post production can be corrected. Once you have replaced the optics kit with better performing goals the files you get are of good quality. I recommend, given the age of the camera, not to be in a hurry to photograph, the sensor needs a few fractions of a second to capture the ideal color temperature and for the right focus. (if you photograph in autofocus.)

Merendino Santo

sent on 24 Agosto 2015

Pros: Extremely compact, adjustable display very useful, ideal weight file, holding high ISO very good to be a APSC, panorama function useful, workable both jpeg files that raw, used paid less than 400 euro with the 16-50 and two stacks in addition For those who want a good quality inexpensively the council strongly

Cons: unintuitive menu, supplied lens distorts much 16-50 16 mm but can 'be corrected in post.

Opinion: I use it for a few months and I am fully satisfied, having bought to reduce the weights of my nikon d300 which I promptly venduto.Molto versatile and compact, fits into the pocket of a jacket so I can take her with me sempre.La advice to all those who They do not want to show off mostrirnfotografici round the neck.

Angyphoto77

sent on 12 Luglio 2014

Pros: Quality images, colors, dynamics, JPG excellent, 16 megapixels (the right to an APS-C), ISO management, optics kit better than the competition, ergonomics, weight, materials of construction, optical viewfinder High Definition (comfortable), pop-up flash, a double ring, Wi-Fi, tilting display (although it limits rotation), Sony service that can be used with any type of optical (via adapter rings)

Cons: Park optics not bad, although it should enrich it more, no touch screen, no GPS (non-essential) menu, not just immediate, battery life (as with all mirrorless), no charger classic, fully rotating display, no caps (body machine and the back of the lens) if purchased with lens kit (this already installed, so it has the plugs supplied).

Opinion: Purchased after several tests. This product was absolutely remarkable. The greatest gifts I have listed in the "pro". RnI 16 megapixels are perfect for a sensor of this kind. The files have a perfect quality. Beautiful colors, rich, alive, especially if you choose the parameter Vivid (from settings menu). The raw files (such as RAW format) are well workable, quietly with the latest versions of the same Lightroom.rnParagonando photos made with the entry-level SLR, often more costly, the files of the NEX-6 I like the most, are the richest detail, better defined, more contrast and rich beautiful colors (real). The combination of sensor and processor works perfectly! RnNotevole is also the quality of the photos you can get with the optics kit, better than many other lenses kit concorrenza.rnPoi is adaptable to any kind of optics, thanks to the many rings adattatori.rnAlcuni minus points are listed in the "against", however these accettabili.rnAd today you can not buy it at a price absolutely inteesting, given the release of the new A6000 (which I got to use it for about 2 months). The latter (A6000) have added more buttons for customization, a new menu, better, more classic (like Canon), have improved slightly the grip (already good on the NEX-6), a lightning-fast AF, fast, (the the NEX-6 is good, but that of the A6000 is a rocket), NFC connection (not required), new processor and a new sensor, led to 24 megapixels, too (in my opinion) for a sensor of this size, it is appreciated with a maximum optical quality, such as the extraordinary Zeiss, otherwise, if you use the kit lenses, I believe that with the NEX-6 (16 megapixel) there is some slight detail in più.rnSe not want to spend so much and get pictures beautiful, the NEX-6 is a perfect product, modern and portable, with the optical pancake 16-50 is almost pocket (type in the pocket of a jacket or comfortably in a classic kangaroo).

Piergiovanni Pierantozzi

sent on 29 Maggio 2014

Pros: Very compact with a DSLR sensor, possibility to mount leica objectives and other manufacturers with the adapter rings, swivel display, intuitive menu and easy, excellent and reliable quality of all

Cons: It makes no sense the wi-fi that is attached to, without having to provide a touch screen display

Opinion: 2C for the color and sharpness. The ultimate would be to employ them on a FF, but percontro you lose the compactness and portability. rnHo found absurd claim to be able to use the wi-fi without a touch screen. To achieve something you must climb up the mirrors, taking too long with laughable results. This aspect of the secondary, and I still think I concluded that the nex-6 is of excellent build quality with very satisfactory performance, particularly recommended for those who have good lenses, let aside after the arrival of digital, put back in the game . rn

Ehoss83

sent on 14 Settembre 2013

Pros: Portability, electronic viewfinder, swiveling display, high resolution, focus peaking, wi-fi, dials, and the control menu, you can install the app.

Cons: Sony color management, battery life, build quality, price, raw files and jpg, external charger and plugs sensor / lens not included in the original package.

Opinion: 2C but really costs a lot of money, and the pictures that returns have a color rendering is not real and really unpleasant for my taste.

Victor76

sent on 16 Marzo 2013

Pros: Image quality, size, excellent electronic viewfinder and the integrated flash, customization, ergonomics, size, orientation features, the peacking makes it easy to use the goals to fire manualernQualità constructive high

Cons: Park optic native tight, of the same size that often detract from the advantages of compactness of the body, adjustable screen only in two directions, battery charging system (but there are alternatives). I do not care for now, but that misses the point out jack for an external microphone.

Opinion: I just bought the nex-6n with the 16-50 instead of a Nex-5n with 18-55, additional viewfinder and flash obviously not integrated. Compared to the younger sister, which I think is another great camera in its own way, I gained in compactness, which was my original intention. The body of the 5n is more compact, but with the 18-55, the flash in your pocket and electronic viewfinder mounted in fact the package is more cumbersome and wasteful. Once the camera arrived I was able to appreciate the best ergonomics, interface easier to manage, the convenience of stasto FN. Does not have the touch screen, but to me that's okay, because that board using both 5n EOS I was to give the fingerprints on the large monitor SLR Canon.rnCome said the image quality is not great but greater than that of younger sister , which uses sensor and processors almost identical. The focus is fast, thanks to the use of both technologies. Very convenient customizable FN key to access veiltively to the settings most frequently used. Nice HDR though, almost admitting his own limitations, only works on JPG. The EVF has a very good definition and turns on / off much faster than the optical 5n.rnDivertentissima with vintage, thanks to the wide availability of inexpensive adapters and the focus peaking.rnIl swiveling display is convenient to use the camera by very high or very low, but only in extreme horizontal. Allows vertical instead of shooting from optical nascosti.rnIl park is not at the level of one of the micro 4/3, much less than that of the SLR. Is growing but in a disorderly manner and lack professional zoom. Plus some objectives may be more compact and better exploit the small size of nex.rnTerrificante the supplied charger, which only allows the battery Montanta on fotocamenra. And 'slow, does not allow to use the machine during charging and not charging the batteries from third parties. Luckily there are a few money chargersuniversal conclusion that go far bene.rnIn a great choice for those who want to travel light without sacrificing a high quality image and for those who want to use optical vintage. Used with the 16-50 is little more than a compact, but the result is hardly comparable.