Sony NEX 3N : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews

What do you think?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 259000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Balsa85

sent on 15 Settembre 2018

Pros: Small, pocketable, good resistance high ISO, economical visas used price.

Cons: The only thing the display that in full sun is not the maximum

Opinion: L I have taken as a second travel body to be flanked by the 6d, thanks to its small size and the draught allows to adapt many non-proprietary optics, has a good resistance to high ISO up to 1600 ISO. The advice to those who want to spend little and have a good quality. With the Commlite adapter it works very well I fit the Canon STM lenses and both the AF and the diaphragms work properly.

Peterlad

sent on 10 Dicembre 2015

Pros: Small, essential in all, brilliant, economic. Price / stratospheric price, yield sensor. Suitable for optical economic not of very high yield 16-50PZ, Sony 16 f2.8, f2.8 20. Battery like any other NEX or ILCE APSC and FF.

Cons: Appreciable noise since iso not particularly high, lack flash shoe, feels the lack of viewfinder given the overall quality of the product. Minimum value ISO200, a little 'limiting

Opinion: The custom took as second body combined all'A6000, then transferred to my son then remained in the family, he was surprised by its compactness and intuitiveness such as to give a hard time to the big sister. The sensor is a great strength even though outdated suffers from noise at ISO also intermediate. It's also very nice with the monitor can be tilted up to 180 °, fun. Very convenient zoom control on the shutter button is not present sull'A6000. On 16mpx optical not very high yield as the 16-50PZ or fixed pancakes 16:20 make unequivocally better. Too bad the lack of flash shoe and viewfinder even as accessories. Strategic battery which is the same as the other models E-mount, has been useful in some situations contingenti.rnrn

Mastro78

sent on 06 Giugno 2014

Pros: very compact, easy to use with one hand using the zoom control at the top, good performance of the sensor up to 1600 ISO. the aps-c cheapest on the market.

Cons: very little personabilizzabile. so small as to say too much at once with zoom lenses that are not the kit.rnautofocus contrasting slow, inaccurate and sometimes impossible to use as a continuous f.

Opinion: had long colevo alongside something small and convenient to my sony a99 DSLR with its kit bulky, heavy and expensive) rnrnho tried the NEX nex 5 and 6 that, while most that can be personalized and more accurate AF, I found them uncomfortable because grip small and forzosa.rnrnla 3n, by contrast, has a small shape on the front, but in reality it takes a lot of comfort with compatta.rnil like a rocker for zooming the kit lens allows me to turn, zoom and shoot using the right hand only, mind, maybe in the other I have my daughter in my arms ... I rnrnl'utilizzo miglliore the ancestral stuck with the sony 20mm 2.8, that being a pankake transforms this room into a real compatta.rnrnnon having claims when shooting with her, I'll settle for jpeg already good up to 1600 ISO. shots in 3200, when processed in raw, do return something soddisfacente.rnrnnon think there is a cheaper APSC. for less than 300 € value for money I think it is exceptional!

Steve121276

sent on 02 Giugno 2014

Pros: Compactness

Cons: noise at ISO 200 already in a very obvious!

Opinion: I bought the nex 3n to have a camera handy to carry in place of 1d mark 2 and after reading many good reviews on this product I focused on this product. Result, say sucks is an understatement! 200 comparable iso 1000 iso 1d mark 2, even the canon G1X file returns much more clean and clear. Also tested with fixed lights but no value, the result does not change, in my view images at the level of a normal compact. It 'true that the price is really low, and that figure we can not expect who knows what, but at this point I can say that they are really just my money buttati.rnForse to have problems, however, I hope to sell it soon.

Dav

sent on 13 Maggio 2014

Pros: Pocket! - Sensor - Price - Retail - yield at high iso - compact - some functions just like the pros but beautiful panorama function - Adjustable screen

Cons: Maf a bit 'slow and inaccurate - screen colors oversaturated

Opinion: Introduction: I was looking for a second car to be attached to my Nikon Full Frame for those occasions when you can not take 5 kg between optical and body and not to miss even one shot. after a long search (fuji x20 - Sony RX100) I ended up on the Sony NEX 3n (costs much less than the other two mentioned before and has a sensor twice the size) and I must say that fully meets my needs! Produces RAW files lavorabilissimi, it costs very little (located at 260 eurooooooo!!) ??Fits into my pocket so I can take her when I go skiing or when they are on a bike or on the beach! Also, I'm not ripiangere left my camera at home and allow me to photograph opportunities that otherwise I would have lost a good quality and a good seal to the other iso (used also in 3200!). It 's almost like having the quality of a canon 600d with 260 euro! RnrnLa highly recommend it, although it depends on the purpose for which you use it (do not think of being able to photograph distant sports action!)

Colbricon

sent on 29 Marzo 2014

Pros: Compactness, price, sensor, tilt screen, compact lens and built-in flash

Cons: Commands, af slow lens bundle (quality), we start from iso 200, not including post and cap machine. target

Opinion: Aps-c that with its 16-50 can fit in your pocket or a small enclosure. The sensor is the excellent 16 Mpxl seen in many cars. Definitely a coffee by the excellent price / quality / size of the sensor. The controls are not the best though customizing the ring is pretty straightforward; functions are those based and does not allow the selection of iso intermediate. Limitation start from iso 200. The af is not the greatest in low light and is unresponsive. I would say 6 + with good light, 5 with poor lighting. The objective 16-50 is very convenient and useful in shooting videos, as little as we overcome the sufficiency; but given the size ... Useful built-in flash, although the yield limitato.rnOttima sensor, working in RAW you recover a lot. Definitely a higher level than the sensor omd EM5, as visto.rnIn final good car (if you think about the cost) with its limitations that should be supported at least one fixed lens to exploit it to the fullest.

Darklay

sent on 24 Gennaio 2014

Pros: Size, weight, quality, cost (bought new on 01/22/2014 267 €), good ergonomics

Cons: The construction seems very sturdy, the buttons seem fragilini, external battery charger is not included in the package, is included only direct the charger to charge the battery inside the camera, uncomfortable, first accessory to buy 2nd battery with external charger. No electronic viewfinder rn

Opinion: The machine works well, has a good sensor, it has a decent menu, the buttons are customizable, though it has only one prayer, manual work is not a problem, since it passes swiftly to diaphragms with a single button and then change them the ring, the adjustment of the iso has a special button (but still are all programmable as we like better). RNLA quality in general is very good, holds up well high ISO, the sensor is known to sony 16.1 megapixel sensor that mounts also d7000.rnIl the Nikon built-in flash is quite powerful and has a good management, the focus is not fast but is precise, thanks to the manual focus peaking is easy to focus, which allows the use of vintage manual focus lenses without problems and with a maf fast and precisa.rnPer its low cost is fine, if you have greater needs, such as the electronic viewfinder, the second ring, the hot shoe etc you must direct serious about 5 or 6, but cost significantly more . rnIo I got to have a machine read for daily use and for use M42 lenses without problems maf