| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
  | sent on 26 Marzo 2021 Pros: sharpness, autofocus, compactness, excellent color rendering, silent shooting, raw file Cons: battery life, ergonomics, iso seal, Sony menu (but we're used to it) Opinion: Used for about 2 years I got very fond of it, compact with a great yield, combined with a Sony 10-18 you can put it anywhere. The color rendering is really excellent as well as the sharpness, used to do a little bit of everything: night shots, fauna and landscape has always returned me fabulous raw, of course the iso estate is not much but for the quality price ratio it is still a great compromise. But now we come to the highlight or the autofocus that is really superb, also used with Canon 70-200 f4 via sigma mc11 adductor it has rarely happened that it missed shots ... especially in continuous autofocus a real gem in short. Overall in my opinion it is really a great mirrorless and I would recommend it to anyone who wants to travel light while still maintaining excellent performance and good quality. Ps: I recommend taking a few more drums as the duration of them is very poor |
  | sent on 16 Febbraio 2021 Pros: White balance in the environment of artificial mixed lights, jpg in the room, smartphone connection speed, fast and precise afc, burst, decentralized electronic viewfinder of good quality, tiltable screen in line with optics and finally usable as well as the electronic viewfinder, construction and aesthetics. Cons: Rear ring, handle a little small on long working sessions, battery life (but it's a no problem if you have the escort). Opinion: Purchased in February 2018 in late sports season (women's B2 volleyball), sure that she would stay in the backpack of the rest how could she compete with the Nikon D750? Well, nikon's in the backpack. Paired with 18-105/4 was what I was looking for. Then combined with 70-200/4. The strengths listed above convinced me at the passage, in a short time the D750 seemed "obsolete". Of the D750 I regret the immense battery life and the comfort of the handle. For the rest, the 6300 proved to be an effective tool using it mainly in low light conditions and mixed artificial lights, fixed iso 6400, taking care to accurately expose and without using cutouts to the photo, the noise present is not at all annoying, excellent rendering of the details and very beautiful the color rendering. In fact today there is the a6400 which is a very valid alternative but on the used undoubtedly the a6300 represents an excellent purchase. It is a review aimed at the type of use that I make of it, the Pros and Cons are subjective. Yet even now that I no longer dedicate to volleyball use it with quality MF optics or old lenses with adapters it is an incredible fun. 6300 forever! |
 | sent on 27 Maggio 2019 Pros: Speed and general operability. Super Autofocus. FullHD Video 120fps. Microphone Jack. Cons: Ergonomics. The position of the video recording button. Non-tilting screen. Very small viewfinder. Opinion: Altogether a very good camera to do everything and that does not disappoint. Some design choices are incomprehensible. The only tiltable and non-tilting screen, the position of the REC button and the stretched format make the ergonomics of this room one of the worst in the segment. Really a pity because there is a lot of substance and excellent quality. Here's My video review: https://youtu.be/Td60JRob5G0 |
 | sent on 21 Aprile 2019 Pros: Size, AF, technology Cons: Ergonomics, Battery life Opinion: I've had this camera for a few months. I used it with several lenses both native Sony-And that Canon EF and EF-S. I Have to say that it is an exceptional camera with excellent technology. The Only problems encountered are:-the battery life, fortunately accepts the recharge from USB then with a power Bank you can add a little ' autonomy; -Ergonomics is also a sore note: The reduced dimensions are absolutely pleasure in the transport but in the handle, albeit comfortable, I would have to say. Another thing is the positioning of keys and nuts that at the beginning are Not very comfortable. |
 | sent on 15 Ottobre 2018 Pros: File, AF Fast and precise, lightweight, typically Sony features Cons: Viewfinder not particularly large, had been 1 cm higher there was also the little finger Opinion: A great value for money car. The file has a very high quality in raw, with very high malleability, in high lights recovers better than a a7r2, while pays pledge in the recovery of the shadows always compared to the a7r2, never used the JPG in the room so I can not give an Opinion. AF very valid and as all Sony goes better in AFC than in Afs. The viewfinder is quite clear and valid only does not have particularly large dimensions. Another small problem that unites all the mirrorless Sony is the position of the migliolo, it would be enough 1 cm more in height, I solved with L-bracket from €20. |
  | sent on 12 Settembre 2018 Pros: Very: very fast and accurate AF, image quality, electronic viewfinder, light and compact, eye focus, good set of APS-C light lenses available, C1 available free, mount and FF compatible Cons: Little: Rear display visibility can be improved with strong light and not fully articulated display. Opinion: I own it from December 2017, after having long weighted the purchase based on the reading of reviews and the visualization of shots both on this site and elsewhere on the net. I am very satisfied: the quality of the images of this compact and lightweight APS-C seems excellent: see for example on this site the photos taken with the 6300 from Juza. Although it has few terms of comparison, it seems to me that the possibility of recovering light and shadow in post is more than good (with Capture One, available free with the machine at the time of purchase). In my experience usable up to 1200/1600 ISO with satisfactory results. The lenses I've matched so far with greater satisfaction are the Sony and 10-18mm F/4 OSS, the Samyang 35mm f/1.2 ED AS UMC CS and the Sony FE 85mm f/1.0. Comfortable the fact that it can also mount FF optics thanks to the Sony mount and: Evaluating a possible switch to FF this allows you to manage your lenses with a broader perspective. AF very fast and Precisissimo: After 8000 shots about those messed up (probably more because of me) will be yes and no a handful... Eye Focus in AF-C very convenient and customizable via custom keys. Fun to mount, through adapters from a few euros, vintage lenses manuals of other brands (possibly benefiting from the focus peaking-personally, after experimenting a bit, I do not recommend the use preferring for the MAF the zoom function associated with A custom key). I do not use it for the video industry, so I do not express myself in this regard. |
 | sent on 28 Agosto 2018 Pros: Almost everything Cons: Battery life, non-touch display and non-tipper for making auto video. Opinion: I purchased the 6300 with 16-50 lens at the end of July 2018. Technically it seems a good machine, but I need your feedback regarding the quality of the photo. To me they don't look nice, however having a poor notebook monitor, I would get an opinion. I seem to have read everywhere that the 6300 is a camera that puts under many SLR cameras, so I think it is the fault of the lens, although some say that you can make nice photos even with the 16-50. My next step is to buy the Sel35F18 and the SelP18105G, but before I do, I would like to remove the doubt that the camera has no problems. Below links with some photos: https://www.flickr.com/gp/164224606 @ N06/ej5855 P.S. unprocessed photos thanks Luke |
 | sent on 24 Agosto 2018 Pros: Transportability, QI, Wifi, use for macro. Cons: Minimum shutter time at 1/4000 "; Battery life Opinion: I am a loyal to the Sony a-mount, I purchased the A6300 to test the mirrorless also in the naturalistic field (poultry, animals, macro and landscaping) and check if you can switch to mirrorless keeping the optics a-mount. I used this machine for excursions in high altitude and I admit that for this area is excellent because of the small size, weight (even that of optics) and make it much more transportable than SLT. With native optics The AF is instantaneous (18-105g) and the functions of traking work very well. Adapting the A-mount optics with LAEA3 or LAEA2 adapters will lose several AF functions and custom keys. I tested it with LAEA3 + 70-400gii at the oasis of Torrile and the quality of the shots is great but the AF has several indecisions when you have to focus from close to far (vice versa is rather lightning... I hope sooner or later to test it with the 100-400 GM to verify there are no The same gaps). The minimum shutter time at 1/4000 of a second, for me, is a great limitation to make avifauna in flight... I also tried it with the Sony SAL 70-200 f 2.8 g and LAEA3... and mounting the dedicated multiplier (SAL 1, 4x)... does not keep the AF... and becomes manual focus... Great for macro instead. Always tested with LAEA3 and TAMRON 180 macro, the AF becomes manual but in macro you use that. The comfort you have when you mount on the tripod, machine and optics are balanced on the lens ring and you work very well. I don't use it for videos so I don't know anything about the video industry. Ultimately the A6300 I prefer and I recommend for areas where the slenderness of the machine and the kit counts much type of trip, street, hiking and for macro. In my opinion, for nature, especially with adapted optics, I would not recommend... even with the 100-400 GM still remains the limit of the shutter. |
 | sent on 29 Aprile 2018 Pros: Light, compact, high quality 4 k video, great picture quality, fast AF, low price Cons: limited-time, overheating batteries for 4 k video, don't touch display Opinion: I purchased this camera for his money, €800 for all features you have available are really but very few, photos in 6 k with a frightening sharpness, iso up to 2000 seems like a full frame AF speed impressive with 425 points to phase detection, a 24-megapixel sensor that makes sharp's portraits and landscapes. I have purchased especially for the video and if one of the few flaws is the fact of the minimum duration of the battery, I still managed to turn a feature-length film entirely in 4 k, awesome quality really and unequaled at the same price. Convenient for travel, small, compact, fits everywhere and brings you extraordinary shots. Sony allows you to mate a series of aps-c lenses really quality, like the zeiss 16-70, I initially used the 18-105 f4, very useful and handy, you allowed every kind of shot, however some aberration factor was there. Highly recommended for anyone who doesn't want to spend insane amounts of money for full frame and can "settle" for a aps-c with quality from another planet. |
 | sent on 13 Settembre 2016 Pros: Lightweight, great segment aps-c lenses, photo quality, swiveling display. Cons: It might make you abandon the FF reflex, useless flash, not Touch Display. Opinion: I purchased this camera tired of break me back while traveling. I also own a 6D and after the purchase of Ml I used much less. The quality of up to 1600 is pretty much the same, the 6D triumphs at high ISO and with some fixed lenses like the 35 f2. rnih trip is a boon, with a small purse I carry all the equipment in just over 1 pound. Equipped with Zeiss 16/70 and 55-210 did not have any other needs. I could also savor the beauty of street photography, thanks to swivel display is not noticed, great comfort. I also added some specific lenses such as the 50 1.8 and 30 macro and I plan to add a wide angle, perhaps 12 Samyang. Buy two batteries, one does not stand up all day. I keep 6D only for the quality of some of its fixed but only Sony ml journey that makes me absolutely no regret. A tip: only aps-c lens otherwise would own way. |
 | sent on 13 Settembre 2016 Pros: Lightweight and compact, the pro-level video features, af lightning-fast and precise, burst, video quality 4K excellent, excellent image quality, excellent electronic viewfinder Cons: Menu commands and uncomfortable, improved ergonomics, back unfit for sun screen Opinion: I purchased this camera after reading the many reviews online that extolled the merits and skills especially in the video industry. I wanted to take on holiday a camera and a 4K camcorder that were read and did not force me to always run with a heavy backpack. The decision to leave a full frame home as the 5D3 was truly daring but I must say that the expectations were already moot. The A6300 has proven an exceptional tool that did not make me regret the beloved 5D3 and, indeed, has allowed me to take not only photos but also of excellent quality video. rnSul photographic industry are thrilled with the results although, exceeding 1600ISO, the quality is obviously not comparable to a FF. In my case 99.99% of shooting sometimes in broad daylight so I did not suffer from this limitation. Crazy the AF accuracy and burst. Only truly frustrating thing are the commands that are really uncomfortable. I partially solved with the customization of some keys and modes but venendor Canon have really suffered! rnPer regarding the infamous overheating when running video, I did not notice the defect but it is also true that I turned the short video clips. For the type of use that I do so I do not have anything negative to say. rnHo also tried to mount some Canon lens with the adapter and most of the objectives it works fine. I could even shoot with the legendary Pentax lenses of my father really excited rnSono of this machine. A very bold choice, but that made me discover the Sony world, I think in many ways light years ahead of the Nikon / Canon competition. I do not deny that in the future I'll do a little thought on the abandonment of Canon for the travel photo / landscape (even given the recent disappointment for the Canon 5D4) leaving only the Canon 7D2 for nature photography. rn |
 | sent on 05 Agosto 2016 Pros: compact but robust, af tremendously fast and accurate, possibility of af on the eyes even with constant f, IQ very high, up to 1600 ISO indistinguishable from a completely silent FF.rnscatto (3fps) Cons: limited buffer (slow actually writing to SD. few external controls, no touch screen. flash off when shooting in silent mode Opinion: I replaced the a6000 that already had a very good car, with this a6300.rnmigliora visibly in strength, viewfinder, shutter release button sensitivity and performance video.rnresta the flaw of slow writing scheda.rnl'af is the thing most of all I impressed. I took photos at football matches where the af was glued to the subject, without being distracted by other players who passed davanti.rnl'af provides extra functions with respect to the progenitrice.rninnanzitutto af eyes are now also allowed using af -c. and is a boon! I photographed my daughter while playing with a friend mattimani (imagine sudden movements throughout the frame with hand-passing continuously in front) over 30 shots only one was on the ear rather than opens the eye with a mounted 55 1.8! rnanche subjects who approach they are quickly tracked very well, with a rate of shots perfectly at 50-70% fire and shots still usable / printable close to 100% .rnrnè been implementata the expanded stitch function. As on many pro SLR you can assign a point (anywhere lel frame) in which the start traking there rnper then track the subject throughout the frame. NO, unfortunately, a convenient joystick to quickly move the punto.rnA Actually, other programmable buttons may be thought meglio.rnassegnando such pomp F1 to shooting mode I would have preferred that to every pressure change the shooting mode instead (as on all the sony) it leads to a carried away, so you need to select and confirm with the PAD. laborioso.rnlo slow and silent shooting could prove very handy in many circumstances (sprints from 30 "to 1/4000) but with this activates the camera mode inhibits the use of the flash, also controls radio external flash etc. probably because the slow sensor reading would create artefatti.rnla video section is at the top. I do the little use, but I can say that f is precise, and the function of slow motion (120fps with output in FHD) is verycarina.rnQui, stabilization on the sensor FF sister is definitely more effective than obbiettivi.rnil overheating much complained it happened to me only once recorded under the sun in July (after 10-15 min of different clips), while the rolling shutter it is actually noticeable in 4K by panning. clearly in a normal use it's really hard to notice. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
