| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
  | sent on 20 Ottobre 2019 Pros: - Value for money (2019). - ECCELLE in portraits and landscaping, for colors the superfine detail and above average resolution (28 mpx). - Detail in 4k videos. - Functions almost from smartphones between filters, editing possibilities and Wi-Fi connectivity - bluetooth. Cons: - Absent sight on the body (sold at a very high price and impossible to find). - Sufficient low-light freehand shots but not up to the height of an F.F. - Optics (few and rare) that once used for her can be thrown away because they do not have a future. Opinion: I bought it in August 2019 in a reasoned way since, wanting to make good "photography", in the cheapest way possible, I noticed that DXOM-rk put this machine, (buyable used at attractive prices), to a stunning 40th place among "monsters "Sacred" like Leica M10... I found it at only 350 degrees (body) and when I got home I tried it with the standard 18-55 ois that I had left from the nx3000 and I swear to you: I was going to throw it away. Very distorted shots, high graininess even at low ISO and yellowing as the light goes down, I wanted to split it, 350 degrees thrown away I thought... Meanwhile, hurriedly, the week before I had bought a 45mm f1.8, and as I was about to close the deal by selling it to a guy on Subit, I got home the new goal. Curious, lost to lose, I fitted him to try and.... I was in disbelief... The machine went from discreet to ECCELLENTE. I found that the 18-55 and 20-50 are not at all suitable for the high performance but overthrusts of this backlit sensor (a bit like mounting a very small intercooler to a 3000 turbo petrol machine), which is precisely true that it is an APSC, but not being great as an F.F. needs "quality" lenses and a good opening to give it its all. Convinced with an excuse I kept it and studying the manual thoroughly I discovered that this machine is a "bomb", especially in the landscape, with the 16mm f2.4 gives panormami worthy of an Alpha 7-7s, Nikon D610-750. Obviously where she is overcome with low hands by the aforementioned is in the freehand shots made at low brightness, where A7 and D610 manage to give "perfection" even with very low exposure times. With the NX500 I churned out evening files of ALTA quality on one condition: easel, long exposure and a good goal, as I said, forget the Standard Lens kit. It is a machine that wants its tricks and its "cuddles", after which it can give enormous satisfaction, since (with the 45mm f1.8 for example) churns out RAW in very "standard" colors without chromatic aberrations, white lights neither hot nor cold, deep black and not disturbed, everything up to 1600 ISO impeccably, in short I would say perfect to work then in posts without "killing yourself". I recommend shooting fHD a50p videos, the 24p of the 4K although of superb quality is fine only in case of quite "quiet" videos where the framed subjects move little or nothing, otherwise you will start to notice the vintage film effect. Defects? I discovered from the original Samsung site that the additional viewfinder exists... but it's nowhere to be found. For the rest I keep it and I am particularly jealous, since my classmates with the money I spent, yes are bought only an EOS 2000d that does not have a quarter of the performance of this flagship, unfortunately but without future... |
 | sent on 26 Ottobre 2016 Pros: much technological Cons: image quality Opinion: I'm not a professional but I tested the Samsung NX500 and an entry level DSLR like the Nikon D3200 could be a first lens has no comparison, mirorless cmq has a picture quality far below any setting than the DSLR. Even at ISO 400 the grain is remarcabile, with DSLR in 1600 the grain even though this is a different story. |
 | sent on 18 Luglio 2016 Pros: Great shots, daytime, sports and night, excellent recoveries shadows and lights, noise almost nonexistent up to 8000 ISO, spectacular video in 4K, very long-lasting battery, you can also recharge with usb then attack with portable batteries, control the phone with wifi, formidable sensor Cons: Cons I have not found, perhaps the lack of an electronic viewfinder, but the display has high brightness and definition. Opinion: I possess for a year, I decided to change to improve, but at present I consider the best mirrorless in circulation, almost 30mpx APSC sensor, comes 100frame for videos, things that other machines of more value to arrive 30frame per second, lightweight easily transportable it has nothing to envy than a semi-professional SLR. The files are full of details, and post-production for me is minimal or non-existent, is a machine that I appreciate every day, only sore point is the difficulty of buying lenses at a good price, for the rest I am very satisfied. |
 | sent on 14 Gennaio 2016 Pros: Superb quality of the file, sharpness and detail, good processability of raw high ISO, AF performance, burst, connectivity, touch, etc. Cons: No viewfinder, build quality good but not excellent Opinion: Good in everything, even in the price. After it I also NX1, which works better at high ISO, in gust and in the AF that is fulmineo.rnUn concentration of quality and technology in the palm of a hand, although in low brightness sometimes the AF is not the maximum. Absolutely recommended for those who want everything at a very competitivo.rnP.s. to match the fixed (16, 30, 45, 60 and 85) ... Extraordinary! |
  | sent on 27 Dicembre 2015 Pros: price-quality insuperabili.6400 iso shooting in Raw from primato.Schermo swivel and touch.Impugnatura firm, second only to the nex of sony.L'assenza viewfinder ... Juza docet Cons: divestment by Samsung. Opinion: simply the best mirrorless ever had and I tried them all, oly, fuji, sony.6400 iso stratospheric shooting in raw and opening it with the raw converter Samsung (free) .Dettaglio extraordinary thanks to generous mpx.Zoom kit must-have making the coupled small as a compact but with a quality gap abissale.Non even want to think about the performance with optical fissern |
|
| sent on 27 Settembre 2015 Pros: Excellent image quality, simple controls, focus reactive, 4k video quality (with unltimo update video pro). Touch screen with exceptional features always at your fingertips and quickly selected, transportability. Excellent images up to 1600 ISO. Cons: 4K croppati, no microphone input headphone outputs. Opinion: You are having had Canon, Nikon D90, D300, and now owner of a d600 and a D7100, I wanted to try the mirrolrless with sony a6000 exclusively for the video, but the video did not have a great quality, sold but always looking for a mirrorless that would meet my needs, until I see the reviews of this samsung (not the brand I trusted). Intrigued beginning to deepen its characteristics, I am convinced, and the purchase, after 10 days of testing various I was amazed by his performance photo / video shooting RAW with detail up to 1600 ISO, usable up to ISO 3200 but with a slight degradation detail, focus exceptional very close to a reflex, even in situations of low light with AF assist. The video industry remain really impressed, focus linear, no uncertainty, but especially quality in 4K in Full HD at 60fps exceptional, his 16-50 motorized kits (something else entirely unlike the 16-50 kit sony ) is great, little vignetting even at 16mm and when using the zoommotorized in the video, the movement is smooth. I had ricredete this samsung nx much that I decided to sell all my stuff to buy nikon also nx1 (for the 4k not croppati), Samsung and objectives. If you are looking for something portable, which face video and image quality this is the right choice, without having to bleed economically. |
 | sent on 02 Settembre 2015 Pros: Good image quality with the new APS-C sensor backlit, good ergonomics, personally I find it a great value for money, 4k video, highly responsive auto focus, same controls of an SLR, screen tilting touch screen, highly customizable and configurable. Controlled remotely by smartphone. Cons: noisy than 1600 ISO, but I think it is normal for this type of product. Opinion: The bought my wife for a few shots without pretense and instead the camera to its outstanding image quality that I was pleasantly surprised. rnVelocissimo autofocus and very precise. Please also scenic shots as a phone (but with a much higher quality). NFC and WiFi complement caratteristiche.rnBuono also the lens kit, the 16-50, apt zoom range, excellent quality although a little 'shadow gap. Fabulous video section with 4Krn |
 | sent on 26 Maggio 2015 Pros: Good quality sensor, good ergonomics, optics (at least some) with an excellent value for money, 4k video, pretty responsive autofocus Cons: Croppati 4k video (see below), no microphone, no possibility of connecting external microphone, optical park limited Opinion: I took it because I needed to shoot some video in 4k ... The picture quality is definitely very good, the (unfortunately few) optics are very good and some very cheap in relation to yield (I took the 30 f / 2 200 euro and I'm very satisfied). rnIl 16-50 in the kit is stabilized and works well, to be a view kit has the advantage of being quite wide (16mm - 25mm equivalent of about FF) rnIl sensor is performing, apparently has no anti-aliasing filter and the recovery of lights and shadows in effect is good. rnDetto this, the noise in general (not counting the recovery) is not anything fancy, personally I would have preferred some megapixel less and less noise, but the market trend is unfortunately rnrnL'ergonomia ... this is good and the display touch- screen is responsive and bright, unfortunately it lacks the ability to connect an electronic viewfinder esterno.rnrnL'autofocus is responsive enough for a compact, usually functionalna well but has problems in situations with more contrast (eg. portrait with a window behind) .rnrnLe video functions are few but more than sufficient, unfortunately lacks the audio input for a microphone esterno.rnOcchio that, unlike the NX1, turns 4k video mapping the central portion of the sensor 1: 1: then the multiplication ratio of the focal must be increased by 1.7x over all'1.6x sensor APS-C. In practice, a 30mm angle of view similar to a 80mm on full frame. The codec used is H.265, you need to download it to view video.rn |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
