Samsung NX3000 : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews

What do you think?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 259000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Nicu95

sent on 31 Gennaio 2019

Pros: Price, Folding screen, ISO seal, excellent automatic white balance, good autofocus, compact, good battery, micro SD.

Cons: No chance to change the exposure, lack of lenses, lack of flash (at least integrated), display with little resolution.

Opinion: Great machine to enter the world of photography. With this I started, then for lack of lenses, flash, accessories, I switched to the world Sony, while still remaining in mirrorless. I state that comparing this to the Sony a6000 (more or less same launch date) has nothing to envy the Sony sensor, perhaps a little better than the ISO seal of Sony. Samsung has worked well on this machine, but what strikes the most is the price. Now you do not find it new, but used costs very little about 120 Euro body plus 16-50 kit lens. Definitely a good deal! A tele 50-200 you find it at 160-180 euros, and here is made a nice starter kit! The ISO estate is excellent considering the price, with an entry level canon already at 800 ISO throw the file, with this salts quietly at ISO 800 without any noise, at 1600 in PP solve the little noise that you create, over the 3200 becomes a bit of a problem. The automatisms of the machine are excellent, the white balance equally accurate, even better than Sony. In manual mode is an agony can not change the exposure, it's all automatic and often you go to + 3 or a-3 like nothing. Good autofocus, although it's not a splinter like on the Sony. Very useful micro SD, talking clearly, between SD and micro SD Now the differences are few, I have a micro SD 256 GB with 100MB/s writing, perfect even for XVCA s 4k, which still use on Sony with adapter. The viewfinder is missing or at least a better display resolution. The battery holds well, but it could better considering its 2330 mah. In short, excellent machine to start, but if you want to take a step forward and make progress in the world of photography you have to change the environment, here you have few goals and hard to find (the 16-50 f2-2.8 made me gorge but... 1000euro!!!), also lack of third party goals. You have adapters for vintage lenses, but goodbye autofocus, and also the focus peaking is not one of the best. Same story with the flashes and accessories, unobvable. Photo quality: 10; Video quality: 7 (lack of 60fps and AVCHD and Xvac s) Build quality: 8.5.

Beppeverge

sent on 06 Ottobre 2015

Pros: Price (when it was on offer), lightweight and compact enough, good resistance to high iso and overall quality of the file more than good with a good workability of the RAW. Great lens standard display tilting the camera is used immediately in a very intuitive, menu done well.

Cons: I miss the optical viewfinder, but not a hand, it is a feature of the model, external flash (supplied), nothing else.

Opinion: I replaced my Canon G12 with this and the benefits have been enormous, file quality amazed me right away and use in general appeared to me immediately intuitive and easy. I find that the MAF is very good on any occasion, perhaps with low light does not work as my 6D but the performance is more than accettabile.rnL'ho used on several occasions leaving behind the SLR and the result has never disappointed me, I think that coupled excellent 16-50 is comparable to any other mid-range SLR, indeed, it is even better except probably use for sports photos where the viewfinder and autofocus better performance of an SLR should make a difference. rnConsiglio undoubtedly the purchase of this camera.

Gianluk

sent on 19 Gennaio 2015

Pros: Price (on offer up to 21/1 to 199 with cell. Trend Galaxy 2 for free!), Photo quality comparable to APS-C Canon / Nikon mid-range, folding screen, WIFI / NFC for smartphones and connected devices ( eg: smart TV, etc.), 16-50 lens compact and excellent quality (though not very bright)

Cons: Missing the cleaning mechanism of the sensor, only the external flash (but supplied in the package), strap a little "cheap", no touchscreen, autofocus fairly fast but not at the top, especially in case of low light, Auto-ISO limited to 3200.

Opinion: Mirrorless camera from value / unbeatable price (at the time). Very high quality thanks to the APS-C: I find shots absolutely comparable to those of my Canon 100D. Excellent as a second body "compact" to carry around when the main Reflex is "too much", or as a first car for beginners but still want good jerky qualità.rn

Alessio.m

sent on 14 Gennaio 2015

Pros: Appearance, assembly held ISO up to 3200 and wanting to go up to 6400 but with PP, collapsible goal, controlling and managing photos remotely via wifi, tilt monitor with good AF in well-lit, provided (combined lightroom 5 perpetual license) PRICE !

Cons: micro sd slot, autofocus in low light, which monitors mounted with Flash can not be completely overturned. Management ISO automatic adjustable up to 3200 then you have to switch to manual management. Too bad the monitor is touch

Opinion: I tried to time a second machine for the holidays, versatile, lightweight and by chance I came across a mega offer NX3000 + smartphone + Lightroom 5 (which I upgraded to 5.7 and always free perpetual license) around 199 €, which say After brief documentation I took the fly and recommended to all those who wanted to enter the world of photography with something less demanding but still valid. Retro look really successful, plastic very well assembled, I think the top is even metal / aluminum. Accustomed to the SLR in hand is tiny but from a certain point of view this is his merit as with the objective 16-50 is really compact. The definition of the picture is good as well as the recovery of the shadows in RAW (always shooting in RAW + jpg base) because sometimes the wrong white balance. Comodo wifi built that lets you manage the room directly from smartphones as well as to transfer and edit files on the fly. I am truly satisfied because its portabilityand its photo quality allows me not to regret too much reflex and not smash the neck with his weight! rnConsigliata

Dadoleo

sent on 03 Novembre 2014

Pros: Relatively compact, lightweight, aesthetically pleasing, good photo quality (definition and held at high ISO), tilt monitor, charging via USB, Included Software, Micro SD

Cons: Jpg little saturated and contrasting Android Application x WiFi slow and cumbersome, low-resolution displays

Opinion: Socket from a few days (and still not thoroughly tested) to have a body alternative to 60D for the outputs read and not purely photographic. The first impact of the body is positive retro look very nice, small and lightweight (compared to an SLR, but not to the level of a compact), especially thanks to the 16-50 Powerzoom collapsible. The plastics are a bit 'cheap, but for the price they're fine. The first experience of use is fairly positive, although not comparable to a reflex, both for ergonomics for ease of adjustment. Designed primarily for use in automatic control buttons and dials are a little 'small and feeling uncertain. THE 16-50 zoom has operated with two buttons, and would certainly have been nice to have even the classic lever concentric with the shutter button (as in the compact) for use with one hand. The screen is quite visible even in bright sunlight, but the resolution is a bit 'low. Very convenient for the micro usb lead directly clicks on smartphone or tablet, whilevery slow and cumbersome application Android via Wi-Fi (unfortunately I can not test with NFC). The supplied software is Adobe Lightroom 5.rnAbituato color Canon, the first pictures I took seemed to me a little saturated and contrast. I'll do a little 'porve with the settings in the room to see if it is a surmountable problem, given that for the purpose for which it is dedicated, I would like to avoid as much as possible the post.

Erricane24

sent on 22 Settembre 2014

Pros: Light elegant intuitive easy to use nice to see good sharpness picture great lens good softwer provided excellent fast autofocus

Cons: A few filters available quality images with low contrast colors washed out and dull in some 'difficult to set up closer to a compact to a DSLR

Opinion: Excellent as a second machine x carry it around, but if you want a good quality of image nn is certainly the ideal go all the photos retouched x color and contrast in color or set always missing some lively indeed many ways x retouching in the car and you hear the lack of other creative filters x but the pc is fine when printing nn know

Gianluca Canello

sent on 04 Agosto 2014

Pros: Image quality at high ISO behavior, Objective valid serial control from your smartphone via Wi-Fi fantastic

Cons: Focus slower in low-light situations, but still lacks external charger charges via a micro USB charger with any auto.rn

Opinion: I purchased this camera for my son, paid 280 euro with 16-50 lens. The first impression is of a well-built and sturdy machine, in black, has a vintage look spectacular. The APS-C CMOS sensor produces images that are very sharp and high-contrast thanks to the excellent sensor and valid objective standard. E 'used in fully manual mode with the ability to set ISO, aperture, time, row of exposures, and anything else. Present the RAW + JPEG. Very good creative preset programs. I found it very accurate white balance. Exceptional ability to control the machine in real-time from smartphone via Wi-Fi via dedicated application. The controls are well laid out and intuitive. The flash provided just enough but there can be seen the optimal behavior even at high ISO. The packaging includes Adobe Lightroom 5 that alone is worth 125 Euros. The battery, although removable (is that the Galaxy S4), we only charge inside the camera using a standard charger micrprovided or usb. I find this interesting because, if we remain without a battery, can charge it with a car charger with micro USB plug. I would say that it is a machine that can give you a hard time for many APS-C more expensive (certainly the 600D EOS-700D). If you churn out the Tamron 14-150 for this machine, I think the combination would be amazing.