Panasonic GH4 : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews

What do you think?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 259000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Lorenzo.C

sent on 13 Agosto 2016

Pros: unbeatable quality / price ratio, good photos, video industry at the top, at the most customizable, manageable and practical.

Cons: Unfortunately, like many owners of this little gem, the noise in low light. Sin!

Opinion: A car that can not be missed for those who, like me, dedicating more time to the video rather than to photography. In video it amazes: amazing quality, fantastic sharpness, bright colors, customizations to go go. So really a professional and versatile object. The 4 k (fantastic!) Do not use it, simply because it is a format that not having done much grip, is not very "considered" given the gravity of the files and upload to youtube infinite. Maybe it's an option that will be useful when the technology will be able to let us enjoy without interminable waits. The 1080 50fps is still perfect for a vision on TV than on yt. Unfortunately, as specified in the contrast, the low light noise is a great sin, but by spending a few pounds more with metabones bright and objectives can be achieved quite respectable results (do not get to know of Sony series levels a6300, of course). The photographic industry is good (I also have a LUmix gx80 as a second bedroom, and the photos are of quality equal to GH4), but certainly not up to SLR prof or semi prof. And anyway: great Panasonic!

user32529

sent on 20 Giugno 2016

Pros: A monster on the front ... Excellent Video In photos!

Cons: Above ISO 1600 suffers .. (and a lot)

Opinion: A machine more suited to video than to photograph (I mainly use it for that) and defending in photography. Of course combined with the 12-35 f2.8 becomes a great movie camera. Quality price? Photography: could be better (for example the A6000 at half the price) Video: Unsurpassed (at least to date).

Lomapada

sent on 30 Settembre 2015

Pros: Good in photography, exceptional video, low price in relation to the video quality and the possibility of video UltraHD

Cons: No major flaw

Opinion: The GH4 is a quite good mirrorless that actually conceals a great camera, able to make video and this also UltraHD. And 'complete in the features, functions and control customization, well pensata.rnLa quality video UltraHD compared to those in HD is definitely a must, once proven, for those who make videos to animals and nature like myself, especially if there is no need to access gutted but enough about US $ 1,500 as the GH4. rnAnche in "normal" mode HD video quality is definitely the GH4 sorprendente.rnIl system Micro 4/3 park has a good optical quality and still expanding. Also with rings adapters of quality, as the Metabones, can be used to better fine optical Leica R, Contax Zeiss, Nikon Ai ecc.rnHo chosen GH4 a year ago and I'm fully satisfied: it consigliabilissima to anyone who wants to engage in video, especially in UltraHD, without investing in some far more Pesanyou economically (and also physically, once the field is important) professional camcorder. rn

Price

sent on 24 Luglio 2015

Pros: Ergonomics, battery life, compact, autofocus, video, file workability. Kept files on long exposures.

Cons: noise at low ISO compared to FF but I would say that is normal ...

Opinion: I entered the world with a ML oly EM10 to have a compact to carry around. Shortly after I switched to the GH4 because I need the video in 4K and what about ... the videos are absolutely Monstrous! Li I expected, but I was able to appreciate the ergonomics really great, the ease of menus despite being very articulate and customization possibilities endless. Of course, compared to a OM10 it is massive but when I mount the 35/70 02/08 and think how great my 5d with 70/200 2.8 smile! AF is really great, the electronic shutter priceless! So I promote to the full voti.rnUnico defect, but then with the size MFT is known is a slight noise already present in 200 ISO.

Stefano Massari

sent on 26 Marzo 2015

Pros: all .. especially for video.

Cons: must be faced with calm .. well designed to achieve excellent results

Opinion: I use it for video with zoom 14-140 (that is versatile and good enough .. nothing to do with the beautiful 12-35). you want but after studying returns incredible results .. the use coupled to the video with canon eos c100 riding a Super35 .. and sometimes I struggle to see the difference in conditions of low light ..certo 1600 iso reaches the limit .. you start to see a little 'noise .. but continuing to study working on curves and parameters of recovery it is definitely headed ..dopodiché is done ... I've got a few days and the feeling is already sky .. the optimum would just work with his 12-35 (that being Micro4 / 3 becomes 24-70 2.8 .. I tried it and it is excellent) .. I also did some shots in road conditions light varies and it's amazing ... excellent machine for sure for those who make video .. for the photos to be discovered ..

Andreabrass84

sent on 22 Maggio 2014

Pros: lightweight machine with a good handle on all the controls are easily accessible and convenient potion! Colors very true to life and resistance to high iso would say very buona.Direi a perfect car from every point of view! Videos are monstrous!! They have an incredible fluidity!

Cons: I did a sensor with a resolution + high ...

Opinion: A car is comfortable to carry that combined with good lenses offers excellent riluttai I would say! Highly recommended from all points of view and for me especially for photographers movie maker! At the moment for me is unrivaled in the recording of the video! Canon and Nikon are forced to pursue this point of view!