| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
  | sent on 05 Settembre 2018 Pros: A phenomenal lens, fantastically sharp, with brilliant background blur (soft bokeh), construction quality. Cons: There is no, he could have a cover. Opinion: Absolutely the perfect lens - the best. I have been using it for 5 months and it meets all expectations that I associated with it. I bought it for body E-M10 Mk II as a portrait crop (discreet portrait on the distance), macro and landscape photos as a short bright tele. The first pictures in good light came out beautifully. He can generate unique, nostalgic images. I'm still learning it and I'm counting on new discoveries of its use. |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
  | sent on 25 Gennaio 2026 Pros: A beautiful object, made with care, light as you can imagine for focal aperture and equivalence to a 150 mm. Beautiful lens and image quality. Cons: The autofocus suffers from the 15-year-old design. It has poor speed, forget the continuous autofocus; Non-tropicalized lens. Opinion: This lens is super priced and there are those who sell it for 1000 euros! A real absurdity. The autofocus depresses the speed of the stacked sensor of my Om 3, and all this alters the modernity of the camera; It's a real shame. Added to this is the lack of tropicalization which does not go well with the extraordinary tropicalization of the machine. Too bad that the micro 4\\3 lens park is renewed so little and does not perfect its best optics! The image quality is excellent and the construction of the object is of great quality. The portability is exceptional. |
 | sent on 22 Marzo 2025 Pros: Lightness and quality Cons: a bit annoying the noise of the diaphragm that reacts to every change in framing / light Opinion: Excellent lens, I was very surprised by its quality. I must say that a lot is related to its remarkable brightness which makes the difference allowing shots that the 12/100, a very large lens but with different characteristics in weight and brightness, does not allow. I was also struck by how flexible she is, so much so that it is easy to go out with her as the only optician. paid half price on Black Friday. Stroke of luck! proved to be a very flexible focal length |
 | sent on 24 Febbraio 2023 Pros: Compactness, brightness, IQ Cons: Hood not included Opinion: When we talk about this m4/3 lens in my opinion we are talking about the RE of portrait lenses of this system; The first approach, the tactile one, immediately gives the feeling of robustness combined with compactness. I have been using it since 2017, I remember a close-up at f / 5 where you could see every little facial hair, however although used at TA it has a very good IQ. I think its only limit is the angle of view that does not allow much else in the close-ups (which is its real field) indoors, while outdoors if you want you can detach the subject well from the background even at f / 2.8 |
 | sent on 01 Luglio 2022 Pros: sharpness, bokeh, compactness (to be the focal length that is!), TA rendering, colors Cons: not tropicalized (but still looks very solid), hood not included, weight to be a fixed m4/3 (but the good glass weighs!), a bit expensive (no offers) Opinion: I have this perspective recently (galeotta was a super offer on a "new exhibition" + € 200 cashback for the Olympus promotion, or rather OM-System). The quality of this lens really amazed me: it does not perhaps reach the peaks of the "pro f / 1.2" (and in any case there is no 75mm f / 1.2 PRO - understood OM-System ....? - , so we talk about comparing apples with pears), but the quality is excellent, already at TA it is practically perfect. His death are the close ups, in which he allows you to keep a certain distance from the subject (it gains the naturalness of the photo). In the "cons" I wrote the weight, not because it actually has prohibitive weights and dimensions (we are talking about 300g and about 6x6cm), but because taking it in hand together with the other Oly f/1.8 lenses (like the 45mm f/1.8, to say) it seems like just another series, it weighs almost triple! Of course, it pays off with even better quality and a nice feeling of solidity, as well as having better ergonomics on pro bodies (E-M1 III). If you are looking for such a focal length (I think of the admirers of the 135mm on FF), it is definitely worth the expense! Advised! |
 | sent on 04 Maggio 2021 Pros: Sharpness, bokeh, yield, construction Cons: Cost, paraluce absence, not tropicalized Opinion: It is one of the best lenses for the m43 system. It has a splendid and unique yield with a particularly soft bokeh. It is quite compact and not very visible but very sharp. Keep in mind that even if the construction is solid, the lens is not tropicalized and the package lacks a lampshade and bag. The original metal light screen has a high cost and is quite easy to miss due to the fixing system. The lens is still a gem. |
 | sent on 23 Agosto 2020 Pros: Sharpness, bokeh, lightness, excellent construction, aesthetics Cons: Nobody Opinion: Magnificent goal!!!! Portrait optics (but not only!!!) excel in many ways. Very sharp already in TA makes, thanks to the good brightness and the focal, a soft and progressive bokeh and also wanting very abundant. To be used mainly for outdoor shots, excellent construction and beautiful aesthetics especially in the gray variant. Thanks to the lightness it becomes a pleasure to transport it and use it maybe in combination with the excellent Olympus 12-40 (together they create a deadly pair). In conclusion if you use m43 and you like to take portraits and photograph details..... you only have that to buy it !!!!! |
 | sent on 09 Giugno 2020 Pros: A (small) jewel that should not be missing in the kit of a m4/3 Cons: The cost of the original lampshade and the feeling like "take everything away from me, but not my 75... Opinion: A 150 luminous equivalent of the size in line with the compact characteristics of the m43 system. Focal not suitable for everyone, but for those looking for a fixed focal canvas and still once tried, it is difficult to get rid of it. Sharp even at maximum opening, at f2.2 and 2.8 it becomes superb. Magnificent lens. The cost of the original lampshade is weak. |
 | sent on 14 Febbraio 2019 Pros: Solid construction, quality, resolution, sharpness, compactness, brightness Cons: Absence Lens Hood Opinion: Extremely compact, solid construction, fully metal and Made in Japan quality. Excellent sharpness and resolve, produces balanced and dense colors, as well as a soft bokeh. Bright Glass, it returns an excellent contrast without chromatic aberrations. lacks stabilization, but with camera bodies like the Lumix G9 it is magnificently replaced. Responsive and fast in AF, I find it very manageable and light, excellent for street, reportage and portrait. Comparable to a 150mm on the FF, I consider it a small jewel capable of enhancing the qualities of the more advanced M4/3 sensors. The lens hood is missing and the original one has an exaggerated cost. But little bad given the opportunity to find alternative, valid and cheap on the internet. Absolutely recommended. |
 | sent on 28 Settembre 2018 Pros: Construction, yield of details already to TA, aesthetics, weight/footprint Cons: Hood and Bag absent Opinion: Taken as a portrait lens or to have a fixed and bright tele at the turn of light, after reading several reviews that unanimously define it as a small masterpiece absolute, regardless of the size of the sensor for which it is designed. In fact it is a perspective of which it is difficult not to fall in love, even for high level construction. The yield of details is already excellent at TA, it improves further but not so sensitively, closing 1-2 stop. The bokeh is very pleasant, top notch. Very compact and light considering the focal length of 150mm equivalent (305gr). Unique in its kind, definitely challenging to use, requires space and premeditation typical of fixed-focal teleconverter. Although unfortunately the opportunities to use it are few, I can not get rid of it. Ear tug for Olympus that for a PRO lens in the substance and price (but not in the official nomenclature) does not include a simple lens hood or a soft bag, but it does charge a trivial €70 metal lens hood! Inevitable lens in a m43 kit for those who love to do portraits with telephoto lenses. |
  | sent on 05 Settembre 2017 Pros: Sharpness, bokeh, constructive quality Cons: lack of hood and a leather case like the other olympus targets Opinion: It is an absolutely excellent lens for both the quality of construction, including lightweight, and image quality that it returns. It has a wonderful bokeh, so soft enough to make me forget about the abandonment of the FF system, exceptional clarity even at TA, with a very fast, unstabilized AF like most Olympus lenses, due to stabilization in the car. Unique neo is the lack of a hood and a leather case such as PRO lenses, even though it is not part of the PRO category, despite the outstanding performance. |
 | sent on 29 Agosto 2017 Pros: Scary sharpness, blurred by dream, maneuverability, lightning fire Cons: nobody Opinion: Optics that I bought used with original lenses in perfect condition to an incredible figure, left me right from the first shoots ... an all-open sharpness I dare say incredible, blurred at top levels, dismounting of fantastic plans, an unmanageable maneuver To other full frame frames of the same level, (I presume that I used the Nikkor 180 2.8 af that I consider one of the best optics ever built) lightning autofocus, spectacular colors. Only neo according to my opinion, a minimum distance of focus a tantino abundant ... but tried in macro with extension ring the quality remains the same and maybe earns even more the blur ... objective that can not be missed in A micro kit 4/3 !! 10 stars |
 | sent on 29 Agosto 2017 Pros: Nitidize, blurry beautiful Cons: Nothing Opinion: Fantastic, sharp goal, incredible engraving. A lens to have and to guard jealously. Maybe the weight is slightly higher than the fixed lens range dedicated to the m4 / 3 but it does not matter, the quality of this lens goes beyond any possible "defect". RnTipico portrait lens (on FF becomes a 150 mm) offers a really blur. |
 | sent on 24 Marzo 2017 Pros: All Cons: Nobody Opinion: I have it in 2013 so I know him well and I think if not the best, is among the top three best goals of the system. Sharpest full aperture even in corners, great focus, af accurate and fast, no aberration, all-metal construction, small and light for the focal going to cover. Missing the hood is true, but it is not a lens defect but rather a lack of focal Olympus.rnSe you like, you can not miss in a kit m43 |
 | sent on 02 Agosto 2016 Pros: Sharpness, even at full aperture, bokeh, construction, very balanced color rendering Cons: Perhaps weight and size to be a MFT lens for the rest nothing else. Opinion: One of the best lenses for the MFT system ... must have at borsa.rnProduce images with a blurred and dividend plans worthy of the best full frame. rnI tones are very delicate and balanced and the focus I think is the highest livelli.rnUna lens High quality at an affordable price in relation to what it offers. |
 | sent on 03 Dicembre 2014 Pros: Sharpness at all openings - contrast - soft bokeh - solid metal construction - fast AF Cons: lack hood - minimum distance MAF Opinion: Probably the best glass in the house m43. A lens excellent in every single aspect. The image quality of the m43 thanks to goals like this 75 F1.8 salt of a step. Images full, intense and if you want with all the bokeh you could want. If the 150mm equivalent do not scare you (and I do not see why, the 135mm is a classic of FF ...) you can get absolutely flawless images you'll find hard to attribute to a m43. I are very satisfied, I use it mainly in ceremonies for portraits distanza.rnLa construction is professional, clear and strong. Found that optically is almost perfect the only flaws are the lack of the hood that were to bring in support, maybe a cheaper plastic, but had to put it. Then I add that it would be m sorry a minimum distance of focus smaller. |
 | sent on 14 Aprile 2014 Pros: Sharp TA edge to edge; creamy bokeh; yield of the best fixed Canon and Nikon; excellent all-metal construction Cons: Hood (expensive) not included Opinion: I have to basically repeat what was written by Ilfabbricante is a magic lens, with a soft and creamy bokeh as only the best fixed Canon and Nikon can give. The result is comparable to that of FF. Sharp already in TA from edge to edge, free from chromatic aberrations (typical bright) virtually absent, has a fast and accurate AF. The construction is excellent. rnrnContro: a lens for almost 1000 Euros and this quality, Olympus finds a way to ruin the picture is not including the lens hood that you have to buy separately for the modest sum of 90 Euros. There is not even a leather / leatherette that a lens like this deserves. rn |
 | sent on 15 Febbraio 2014 Pros: Sharpness and risolvenza since the maximum aperture disarming, creamy boken, magic level of performance that only targets 1.4 Nikon and Canon know how to treat yourself. Cons: Perhaps the price if added to the hood becomes important, but in the end even exaggerated when compared with the first Nikon and Canon.rnParaluce not included. Opinion: One of the few goals that you do not notice it being passed from one system to a professional SLR M 4/3; taken two weeks ago and the assets I made a few shots, but having tried many first Nikon I can say that the magic c ' is all; boken creamy and soft, well-controlled AC, sharpness crazy already incredibly TA that does not improve significantly closing the diaframma.rnChe say, does not show the side by a lot of criticism and I can not wait to use it on serio.rnAcquisto highly recommended. rnrnUnico inexplicable flaw is the lack of a lens hood and a soft case as in the 12-40 pro. Olympus .. you were afraid to ruin? rn |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
