| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
  | sent on 17 Maggio 2024 Pros: Good image quality. Compact and not showing off. Very useful focal length. Cons: Looks cheap (I hope it is robust) Opinion: For years I used my Nikon Df using the Voigtländer 40/2 and 58/1.4 as my standard lenses, rather than the classic 35 / 50 / 85mm. While 58mm remains my favourite focal length for casual portraits, I admit that 40 is much better for event coverage. On the Zf, the Nikon Z 40/2 would be a match made in heaven, but for the plastic construction of the latter. Optically, it is better than the Voigtländer, esp. wide open, also with less artifacts but still with a non-clinical look. The bokeh in particular is interesting, not busy but somewhat "vibrant", providing a nice backdrop to sharp foregrounds and very good subject separation. And for event coverage? I recently decided to make it my sole lens on a graduation party, all shot in B&W and using some significant "electronic" zooming (well, cropping in PP). With hindsight, I do not regret not having taken the classical 24-70/2.8 with me. Lots of keepers. The cropped shots are quite acceptable in B&W, with the Zf sensor providing an illusion of film grain, somewhat HP-5 like. Bottom line, while it is a lens with many compromises, it is a very good buy. The kind of lens to always keep in the bag, esp. when one needs a rest and shoot instinctively. Do not forget to purchase a short third party hood, as none is supplied and the front lens is a bit exposed, being close to the front of the barrel. |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
 | sent on 23 Marzo 2026 Pros: Compactness and Lightness, Aesthetics and Design: It goes perfectly with retro-looking camera bodies (such as the Nikon Zf), especially in its SE version; Value for money: It is defined as an economical lens, making it accessible for those looking for an optic with personality without breaking the bank. Cons: Build Quality: The construction is entirely plastic, including the bayonet; At full aperture (f/2) the sharpness on the subjects is rather limited; Limited Use: Precisely because of its particular rendering, it is less suitable for rigorous professional uses and more devoted to set portraits or creative photography. Opinion: Built entirely of plastic, including the bayonet, the Nikkor Z 40mm f/2 focuses on compactness and lightness, making it a really practical choice for bodies like the Nikon Zf. It's a lens that you can take anywhere without thinking too much, perfect for everyday or street use. The rendering is deliberately "old-fashioned": it has several optical defects at full aperture (such as softness and a bit of aberrations), which however are significantly reduced by closing the diaphragm. This does not make it a clinical optic, but rather characterized, with a look that may appeal to those looking for a less perfect and more "analog" aesthetic. This "vintage" rendering goes very well with the design of the SE version, creating a coherent whole also from an aesthetic point of view. At f/2 it offers a soft and pleasant blur, even if the sharpness on the subjects remains rather limited: more suitable for portraits set or creative photography than for work where maximum precision is needed. Overall, it's a cheap and lightweight lens, with personality: not perfect, but for that very reason interesting for those who appreciate a less modern and more characteristic rendering. |
  | sent on 16 Novembre 2025 Pros: Lightweight, compact, bright, 9-blade diaphragm, focal length Cons: Not usable by T.A., no lens hood Opinion: I bought this small lens to support it as a fixed light to the 24-200 in "light" releases. The focal length is interesting on FF because, although it is not a true wide-angle, it still allows you to widen the field of view and overcome the 50mm limit, which is sometimes a bit "narrow". It's compact, lightweight, pretty sturdy despite its all-plastic construction, so it's a great travel lens. The 9 aperture blades also allow for pleasing bokeh in ambient portraits. The main problem is that at full aperture the images are not sharp and even at f/2.8 it lacks a bit of contrast. From f/3.5 onwards, the sharpness is impeccable and the contrast is also good. For this reason, its use is limited for me because, with the same focal length, I almost always prefer to use the zoom, which is more versatile. For the absence of the lens hood I solved with a folding rubber one for 5 euros. In conclusion, a good lens. Vote 8 |
 | sent on 04 Gennaio 2025 Pros: Lightweight, compact, unexpected optical quality Cons: Materials and cost Opinion: I have the SE version, which gives a wonderful aesthetic to the ZF. In particular, despite the small front lens, it is nice to see the aperture blades semi-unfolded in the rest position. The lens allows you to move by perceiving only the weight of the camera, and to take advantage of its excellent aperture and versatile focal length for different photographic genres. It invites you to approach the scene or to compose it a bit in the "old way", restoring a certain taste in photography. What really annoys (beyond the absence of the lens hood that can be found after market for a few €), is that the aluminum-colored bezel is not (precisely) aluminum and that the bayonet is plastic. For the price of 300 € Nikon could make this EFFORT!! |
 | sent on 01 Gennaio 2025 Pros: Lightweight, compact does what you don't expect, really great Cons: Nothing to report Opinion: The focal length is interesting, it is a real all-rounder. excellent rendering and colors, It is always in the bag and helps on many occasions. To those who complain that it has something plasticky cheap I answer with only 2 comments: the photos are taken with the lenses and not by touch, and with the price of the 50 f 1.8 or the 35 f 1.8 you buy 3 !! lens hood? you can find plenty on Ecommerce sites starting from 10 € (the one that starts with A..) . Autofocus not a lightning bolt but more than enough for portraits, street and landscapes, of course you don't make birdlife with it (but only because it's too short Hahaha). Really bad not to have it |
 | sent on 17 Maggio 2024 Pros: Do what you don't expect. Cons: It looks like a toy. Opinion: Purchased in July 2023 and used on a Nikon Z6II, this lens always ends up in my backpack when I go out to photograph. Its light weight and small size make it easy to carry around, almost forgettable. Every time I look at it, I wonder if it was a sensible purchase, so much so that sometimes I'd rather shoot with the iPhone. Yet, despite my initial hesitation, all the photos I've taken with this little lens make me say, "Not bad, this little bastard." In conclusion, I use it less frequently because I prefer other lenses, such as the 28-70mm f/2.8, which is much heavier and bulkier. However, when I use this lens, I'm always happy with it – it's great for portraits and moving photos. One good thing is that my 10 year old daughter loves it and uses it all the time. In the future, I plan to buy the Nikon Nikkor Z 26mm f/2.8 as well, when the price is cheaper. |
 | sent on 10 Maggio 2024 Pros: Very nice all-rounder, very interesting focal length, adequate image quality Cons: SE stand-off version, pitiful construction Opinion: A super interesting focal length, longer than the 35mm, but shorter than the 50mm. One of my favorites, since it allows you to shoot with an "all-rounder" lens, which can alternate between street and portrait set without great sacrifices. With the 50mm it would be limiting in one direction, with the 35mm in another. In fact, it is sold together with the ZF in KIT, designed as a unique lens, and what a KIT! It's a shame it's all plastic, and the SE version, called SPECIAL EDITION, is actually a plastic. Alas, I can't stand to ride with a jewel like the ZF, and to feel in my hand this snag with a gray painted plastic bezel that wants to emulate an old AI. I would have happily spent twice as much for a specimen with a decent construction. I understand the basic version, but why make the SE out of plastic? Why Nikon, why? Basically, it is recommended for those who want a compact 35\\50 mm to be mounted on a Z body and are aware of its CHEAP nature (although the photographic results are not at all), not recommended completely for those looking for a premium feeling from its lenses and a rewarding user experience. |
 | sent on 10 Gennaio 2024 Pros: Compact..... light..... strange size... but how do you get used to it... Very comfortable... price.. File quality Cons: I can't find any... I like it very much. Don't have it Opinion: Hi taken to flank the 24-120 f4..... Very compact and goes unnoticed.... precise.... Very nice the Boken and I don't find any flaws... I also bought the lens hood.... To be precise, 2...one fixed and one that can be put upside down... like the classic lens hoods..... but then the lens gets longer... even when closed... a few millimeters...... but in the bag it starts to be precise... and I take it off badly or slowly... so on the road I always find myself using it without a lens hood.... so I don't know if it's good to have them... Bought.... I still have doubts... the rigid one already resold with the 28....the other one I keep but with reserve I think that with the lens hood it loses one of the best qualities... i.e. compactness.and tropicalized and churns out beautiful files ..... if you are not a professional it has an excellent compromise between price quality Rated 9 |
 | sent on 06 Gennaio 2024 Pros: Weight and size to carry around Cons: everything else, especially the fact that they don't even give you a lens hood and case for about 250 euros Opinion: As with the z 28 f.2.8 lens, my review is far from positive but better. Paid new Nital 249 euros, to the touch of a cheap plastic to be clear, nothing compared to the Z 35 and 50 (1.8) which I continue to think are of a very good quality. I took a few photos and they are of average quality, slightly below my expectations. On the positive side, as with all z series lenses, you have that you use the ftz adapter. If I think of a lens of this range, I am reminded of a nikon af-s 50 1.8 that new nital cost about 239 euros; The build quality is far superior to the Z 40. Also in this z, in the box there are the only and usual instructions in various languages (which for me could avoid putting and putting in nice qr code that if you want you can read them). Alas, there is neither the lens hood nor the case (okay, the bag of the z series is pitiful but at least put it on). Consciously bought to always have and lighten the backpack with a light focal length but with a discreet blur. The grade would have been higher, almost close to satisfactory, but the plasticity (especially) and the lack of lens hood and case had an impact. Rating 4- |
 | sent on 24 Agosto 2023 Pros: Dimensions, Brightness, Tropicalization Cons: Nothing Opinion: Taken to use it in situations where I have to shoot with the least volume of equipment on me (some holidays, street photography) and I want something even smaller than 50mm or 24mm, I found it impeccable for what it offers. I don't think it's as revolutionary as maybe the 50mm f/1.8 G was when it came out for F mount (which had a very similar launch price and size), but I struggle to find faults for the range of use it covers. If you have the same requirements as me I find it better than the 28mm (I have not tried the 26mm which however has another type of price). If you care more about the final bare and raw yield and you can sacrifice a little space and a little more money, the 50mm f/1.8 (Z) is obviously a whole other world. |
 | sent on 14 Agosto 2023 Pros: Size, performance, price Cons: Nothing Opinion: I had tried the 50mm 1.8 for Z, but I returned it, ok the PRO performance, but the price is definitely too high; For many, the photo is a hobby and we often have to settle for it if certain expenses are not possible in the family budget. Luckily I decided to try this 40mm f2 for Z: I was completely satisfied with the exceptional quality and yield of the shots. Considering the small size, as well as a negligible weight, this lens is now my favorite. I recommend everyone at least to try it. |
 | sent on 13 Gennaio 2023 Pros: Size, brightness, price. Cons: Nothing considering the pros. Opinion: The 28 mm and 40 mm combination makes the high-performance Z6 and Z7 light and small. I also own 2.8 lenses but practically impossible to take on demanding trips for size and weight. The 40 mm is versatile suitable for night photos, street and the performance is excellent, especially considering the price. I also own the 50 mm 1.8 for Z but much heavier and bulkier (about double). An optics that can not miss in the kit and once used will hardly go in the bag. |
 | sent on 13 Ottobre 2022 Pros: weight and compactness Cons: not having it Opinion: A very comfortable lens to carry with you, qualitatively it has nothing to envy to the most 'emblazoned 50 1.8 s that however' costs twice as much. Friend of my walks with the z6 is in a very small handbag and becomes a kind of mobile phone with more 'quality' ff. I also had the 50 but it does not have its handling and portability and on the other hand the optical quality does not differ much. Difficult to find better considering the price. ah it also makes the stars ... even if someone denies it. |
 | sent on 09 Marzo 2022 Pros: Exceptional price/performance ratio. Sharpness. Tropicalization. Cons: Nothing taking into account the above. To look for the classic hair in the egg, good autofocus but not a splinter; lack of a dedicated hood included in the package. Opinion: I bought before Christmas the Nikkor Z 40/2 and I must say immediately that, after three months, the judgment is very positive and overall satisfies me. The focal length of 40 mm you have to get used to, being about halfway between the most "normal" focal lengths of 35 mm and 50 mm that photographers are used to but, after a first use, you get used to it immediately (at least so it was for me). Very convenient price and also the relationship with the performance that is obtained; therefore, the "quarrel" about the "plasticity" of the construction is useless. Optically it is very sharp in the center practically on the entire frame, even when shooting at f/2; the performance at the edges is, however, optimal from f/4 to f/11. The best total results are obtained at f 5.6 - 8 Beautiful blurry. When I go out with the camera without a precise target, I have always mounted it and it pays off in terms of lightness, small footprint and - if necessary - brilliant performance. In short, a compact and lightweight lens ideal as a main walking lens or as a light second lens. |
 | sent on 09 Gennaio 2022 Pros: I find it fantastic, indisputable value for money, I love its small flaws. Cons: Maybe the missing hood, but personally I wouldn't use it anyway. Slight loss at full aperture but fantastic in portraits. Opinion: I attached it to my nikon z6 and I never took it off, I have fun to die for, fantastic bokeh, at f5.6 is exceptional, I do not see any collapse at the edges, as they describe on Youtube, apart from full aperture, I sold the z 35mm 1.8 and I took the 28mm and 40mm, well! One of the best choices I've ever made. Finally a lens that has a bit of character. I seem to be going back to the fifty I had on the f5 but with a little more angle that in my opinion is perfect for all-rounders. |
|
| sent on 26 Dicembre 2021 Pros: Lightness, colors, blurry, sharpness at f/5.6, spectacular for videos. Cons: Autofocus not always precise, not excellent sharpness at f/2 (but not even to be thrown away), slight chromatic aberration. Opinion: Objective that has its why. Beautiful lens to take around the street, urban landscape (it can also be very sharp at intermediate diaphragms), good for close-ups (very pleasant blurry) and above all surprising for videos, very three-dimensional. On the other hand, the autofocus is not always accurate, it is certainly not an f/2 blade and shows a slight (but evident) chromatic aberration at TA. With a little more experience in using it I will be able to tell you more |
 | sent on 31 Ottobre 2021 Pros: Small and light, fantastic blurry, f/2 aperture, satisfying AF, for what brings me out the price is ridiculous Cons: Lack of hood, images sometimes a bit 'soft but pleasant. Opinion: For the price at which it is sold, I hope not to hear about plasticity or other such menates. At the time of SLRs I have always looked for a lens with these characteristics but with F mount there was nothing. I replaced the much more expensive 35mm f/1.8 for this very compact 40 and I have a lot of fun, especially in the dark. Only problem is that it makes me leave the small LX100 II just taken for how much, although it has a fixed focal length, it is versatile and light |
user146567
 | sent on 13 Ottobre 2021 Pros: Compact, Bright, Tropicalized, Quiet, Exceptional QP Ratio Cons: AF Slow, absence of a standard hood but only purchased separately. Opinion: Bought recently I write this hot review, since I saw that mom Nikon had published his release I fell in love with it, and after seeing the cost I promised myself that it would be mine. Small, compact, a lens that does not give in the eye, very useful for those who "steal" photos, very light, is the ideal friend of the amateur photo that on Sundays, while going out with the family, does not give up carrying the camera with him to impress the most beautiful moments without having to resort to the smartphone. Slow autofocus and optical quality not from S Line Nikkor, but for 1/3 of the cost of 35mm 1.8 Nikkor, and 100 euros less than third-party optics you take home a phenomenal toy. At full aperture it brings a soft blur, it reminds me a lot of vintage lenses such as the helios 44-2, at f7.1 it gives the best of itself with a very good incisiveness in the details. Love at first sight |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
