| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
  | sent on 05 Dicembre 2025 Pros: Value for money, solid, essential and functional construction Cons: over time it could be "too essential", operational speed in 2025 Opinion: This camera is the perfect answer if you are looking for a resistant, compact, no-frills reflex, but at the same time cheap and capable of pulling out excellent shots. The construction is perfectly in line with Nikon's standards, that is, almost perfect, I have used this body without problems for years, without giving it much consideration and it certainly never complained, even after falls or sessions in light rain. Despite the compact size and low weight, the ergonomics are excellent, I have large hands and despite this the little finger does not come out of the figure of the camera, and I can shoot for a long time without having discomfort. The user experience is also improved by the position of all, few, keys, placed where you would expect it. The quality of the files that this sensor manages to churn out is very good, the 24 mega pixels are a perfect compromise between definition and ISO tightness, also the raw are light and will not give problems even if worked on computers that are not very new (about 20mb). The resistance to high iso could be a limit for some, even if for what is my use I hardly use it above 1600iso, a value at which it still copes, at 3200 the noise becomes much more intrusive, especially if the photo is not exposed correctly and you have to go and recover underexposed areas in post. The huge range of lenses available is another of its pluses, absolutely to be taken into consideration, especially if you look at the second-hand market. The battery has a satisfactory lifespan. Clearly, being an entry level body, you have to make some compromises, fully justified by a price that is absolutely affordable today ( |
 | sent on 28 Ottobre 2024 Pros: Exceptional quality/price. Cons: Fixed screen. Opinion: I've been using this apsc for some time which is a luxury for an entry-level. I replaced it with a d5300 just to have the mobile screen, wi-fi and a few more focus points but it still does its job perfectly. I found it to be a reliable and versatile camera for a modest price paid compared to other cameras. |
  | sent on 29 Luglio 2024 Pros: Complete and robust entry level Cons: For its price nothing in particular Opinion: It was my first DSLR, previously I used a Canon Powershot 500 bridge. Bought in 2016, with 18/55 and 70/300 DX, I preferred it to the entry level Canon of the time because of the 24 mega sensor instead of the 18 of the competitor and I must say that I did not regret it at all. It was perfect to introduce me into the reflex world, easy to use completely in manual, small and light, it holds well in the hand, capable of churning out very sharp shots. The ISO hold is good up to 1600, but in well-lit urban environments at night I used it with decent results even at 3200, even if the noise, of course, is noticeable. The AF, when used on static subjects or in slow movements, is absolutely up to par. After a couple of years I also took the 35mm fixed 1.8 ED FX and I must say that with this lens it has become a sort of "little bomb", in portraits or in urban night shots with a fixed camera and long exposure it is a combination capable of bringing out beautiful photos. To add that it is also very robust, it fell to the ground a couple of times without consequences. I sold it after six years of great satisfaction to get an FF. It is a perfect camera to start with, to be recommended without a shadow of a doubt to those who want to enter the reflex world or, in any case, have a "serious" camera without breaking the bank. For value for money I give it a more than deserved 9. |
 | sent on 31 Marzo 2022 Pros: Probably the SLR with the best quality / price ratio in the world used Nikon. The quality of the images it churns out is embarrassing, as are its more expensive contemporary SLRs (see 7000 series). It's damn small, light and discreet. It is the cheapest SLR compatible with AF-P lenses. The battery lasts forever. You can't get it off. Cons: First of all the AF department, but you know and matter only if you photograph subjects in moviemnto constantly. For occasional action shots or still subjects it does its own. And then missing all the knick-knacks, levers, buttons, functions, articulated screens, U1-U2, wifi, Bluetooth, etc. of more expensive models that make it less immediate, but precisely it is an entry level made to be essential. It is still paired with the AF-S 18-55 VR II which cannot fully stand up to its 24 Mp. 95% viewfinder. Opinion: Do you like photogrfia? Do you like to take a relaxing walk and take home a couple of nice well-made photos? Are you a penniless person who wants to learn photography? Do you want to take home some nice photos from the trips without hanging up your luggage and without the anxiety of dragging around you expensive and without the wide angle of the mobile phone? She is the answer. You stick the Nikon 35mm 1.8 DX on it and challenge you to be able to leave the house without the temptation to put it in your backpack or shoulder strap under your coat. If you want to exaggerate the vices as well with the AF-P 10-20 VR and AF-P 70-300 VR DX. Taac and the Nikon DX Dream Team is done. Or it goes well, there are also af-P 18-55 VR to match if a* wants the "normal" zoom. Obviously if a* wants to make a specific photogrfia look elsewhere (FF for portraits, DX pro for photo hunting, etc.), as well as for videos. For everything else, that is the most spontaneous and relaxed photography there is her. 24 Mp are a bang and unless one finds the winning photo to print in A0 or to spend hours retouching on the PC, it goes to god with jpeg small basic (file + light -> less slam) if one progrmma well (for those who chew English I refer to his page on Ken Rockwell's site). I read about a lot of spec masturbators complaining about poor ISO tightness, but what do you want?! Either go and spend at least 3 times as much for a full frame or a mirrorless or go directly to buy a flash. At 12800 ISO it churns out photos at the height of any social or medium/small print. The autofocus and the viewfinder are the only two notes a bit sore: 11 focus points positioned very central leave you with your neck pulled. But everything that falls into those 11 points focuses on it perettametne and without hesitation, especially when combined with AF-P lenses. Even in low light the fire catches it, and this without even the auxiliary illumiantore. You will not be able to get enough of your friends who ask you for the photos of the last evening. The viewfinder is fine, it's small, but you know, and it's 95% (oh, even Full Frame semi-pro Nikon have comuqneu the coverage of the viewfinder at 95%) which does not help for the compositions, but after a while you either get used to it or you use the Live View for shots composed to the millimeter. Even for short videos on a tripod it does not fare badly, it certainly will not have the adjustable screen or the stabilized sensor, but unlike the D3400 and D3500 it has the jack socket for the microphone. In the second-hand market it is found below 200 euros. There are renowned photographers out there who have become who they are with only a simple and essential camera combined with a normal lens, because instead of making saws on the data or wanting to show off the latest model they focused on the photogrfia and what they have in their hands is just a tool, a link between their creativity and something tangible like a file or a print. I think this damn thing is a ticket to get on that road. Then it goes well, as mentioned above, for specific things one uses dedicated professional tools, for everything else there is that small cheap SLR that churns out embarrassingly beautiful photos. |
 | sent on 30 Novembre 2019 Pros: Little weight, compactness, general organization of buttons/dial,cost Cons: ISO Estate Opinion: It's just been sold and I ended my adventure with the D3300. This machine has ferried me from the low levels of photography to a good level in a path of about a year and a half. In my opinion, if one makes the most of it, it can really take out photographs even higher than what you should actually get. It's an entry-level, yes, but it can go even a little further than its level. Obviously everything in my opinion. However I found myself very comfortable, little weight and footprint, good yield of focus and click, quick and silent. Perhaps what penalizes her the most is the ISO seal that from 800 and up begins to feel consistent phases. But let's not forget that it's an entry-level. I recommend it to all those who start with photography and want to have a machine not too expensive and heavy but at the same time with a good yield. |
 | sent on 02 Gennaio 2019 Pros: Cost, weight, ergonomics. Cons: In relation to price none. In absolute little estate over ISO 1600. Maybe a little bit unbalanced forward if paired with a medium tele. Opinion: Owning a Ferrari that goes from 0 to 100 in two and a half seconds, which consumes a liter of LPG every 30 kilometers, comfortable to bring the whole family on holiday (with luggage), but at the same time very small for the use of the city and that costs 4,000 euros : Who wouldn't want it? Of course, in judging an object you can never ignore the cost. And in relation to spending for me the D3300 is a great camera. After years of "purgatory" with a compattina, I chose it in December 2017 to return to the world reflex (and enter for the first time in digital!) after having amused myself for a life always and only with the manual/analogue, read Yashica FX3 Super 2000. And I think the little Nikon was the perfect school ship to learn about the new world. Simple to use, she was a loyal companion for a year. For some 11 AF points are few, but being directed to the beginner I think are more than enough. Idem for the "only" 5 shots burst. Clear that it will never be the main camera body for a professional, but surely it will be fine to those who want to start. And once you start, you will not immediately feel the lack of something more "performanant". |
 | sent on 27 Settembre 2018 Pros: High quality price between the entry-level. As a first body can make you understand what you want from photography and what is photography. Great Grip for all hands. Decent KIT lenses. Shoot 600 photos with a battery. Cons: Noise is felt after ISO800 "usable" files up to ISO3200 (maybe). Lack bkt, peaking focus, HSS. Opinion: Machine body obviously Entry-level, in this area does its dirty work. I don't see any noticeable differences with the new models. Suffers on the holding of the ISO right away, it avoids going beyond the ISO 800. The bkt, peaking focus and HSS functions are missing. The focus points are few, at the beginning you will not be very case, but over time is a problem. |
 | sent on 28 Marzo 2018 Pros: Excellent value for money, versatile, low weight, easy to use, objectives in stabilized kits, excellent grip, wide choice of lenses (also second-hand), guided mode Cons: A bit 'too much noise at high ISO, after all is an entry level. Opinion: Machine body now out of production but is still on several sites and in stores, perhaps even at lower prices than the initial ones as replaced by the D3400.rnThe guide mode provides a decent support for those who are beginners and the files are really buonirnDecisamente an excellent entry level that I recommend as a starting point for your photographic passion. |
 | sent on 03 Novembre 2017 Pros: very worthwhile price, endless battery and lightweight body machine. Cons: maybe a big noise is raised, a few points of focus Opinion: it was and it is my second nikon in dx and I have to say that I was really satisfied with it .. thanks to the practicality of the buttons that for the lightness the battery lasts an eternity it never lets you walk virtually..forse to big raised sounds a bit of noise but with good tools and good control of the camera you can relieve and make good shots even at night, I highly recommend you to start approaching photography. |
 | sent on 31 Agosto 2017 Pros: Compactness, competitive price, durable battery (350 shots), great materials, 24-volt sensor that resists great at iso iso and beautiful images. Cons: Few focus points, high iso produce unimportant photos of nikon name, microphone personally think it is poor or nearly close to sufficiency. Opinion: I think it's a great reflex, bought for a price with 18-55 lens (certainly not a whole thing) and tried for just under a week I'm noticing the great utility of the car. The pictures are spectacular, and above all it's very intuitive. Maybe I would have a better microphone but do nothing. Very good price. An entry level to have. I'm looking to buy a 1: 1 macro lens to test the beauty and sharpness of the images to the utmost. |
 | sent on 19 Luglio 2017 Pros: Low price, intuitive, durable, lightweight battery Cons: Few focus points, raw compressed, multiplier compatibility and extension tubes, does not have an internal AF engine, does not support macro calibration of targets AF Opinion: Surely it's a great car to get started, with its 24MP (6000x4000) sensor capable of taking images up to 3200 iso, instead of "clean" images you can have up to 800 iso. Not having the anti-aliasing filter the images are sharp and contrasting. Unfortunately, after 1 year of use, the shutter button sometimes does not work and if you want to add old multipliers or extension tubes without pin, you will find yourself in a manual without an exposure meter. At shutter speeds it is good to be a reflex entry level, although the 11 focus points are few and in poor lighting conditions make it difficult. Ergonomics are more than good, even for those with big hands, will always ensure good grip. Battery lasts about half day and little more than continuous use |
 | sent on 18 Luglio 2017 Pros: Weight, value for money, image quality, automatic programs for those who approach the photographic world Cons: Just ISO enough, few focus points, no touch screen, no wi-fi connection (for social addicted) Opinion: I bought a D3300 a few months ago to replace my old bridge and for now I'm very good at it. Rn I was impressed with the ergonomics of the machine, a bit less materials and finishes. Anyway, it's a great entry level (maybe the best for your band) to get into the world of photography. The positive value, of course, is the value-for-money, low weight and good image quality thanks to a great sensor. The mediocre ISO-hold (fine photos are obtained up to 1,600 ISO and no later), few focus points, no touch screen, which is now a widely-used and widespread system. For social network fans, there is no WI-FI system to share photos directly online. My opinion is a good entry level (if not the best) so I can only recommend it |
 | sent on 26 Giugno 2017 Pros: Quality of materials, comfortable in the grip, great feedback from touch materials, durable and best value for money to be an entry level, versatility at the top Cons: Produces very rough, medium to high ISO photos, it's great to get into the photographic world, mono microphone Opinion: I bought this D3300 to introduce me to the reflex world, with Kit 18-105, the optic is not bad, but let's remember it's always a kit. The car is comfortable, and versatility is one of its great qualities, great for getting into the world of reflexes, I'll always keep it with me even when I'm upgrading the body. It is very difficult in situations of low light and moving subjects. Associated with a 70-200 2.8 I made good shots. RnrnI recommend you to enter the world of reflex, I did not feel the lack of touch or swivel display, or wifi. rn |
 | sent on 27 Febbraio 2017 Pros: 24 mp sensor that resisted well at high iso.rnPoco weight, small size, excellent quality dell'immagine.rnErgonomia. Cons: only a doubling adjustable ISO values. mono microphone. Opinion: It has become a bit of time I own this camera, the more time passes the more I appreciate his skills, the value for money and the prestazioni.rnIniziannelme I seemed to have taken an entry l. Too basic, seeing the program guide menu that has ecc.rnMa then using it I realized that ... it is a machine for end location must be accessible to novice users, but it is also powerful and efficient and It lends itself to large to be used in situations that require versatility, convenience and qualità.rn |
 | sent on 28 Gennaio 2017 Pros: Great sensor, image quality, ISO up to good rn1600 / 3200, excellent Raw. Cons: Very few. It is the best of this price range, but if I find some, I would say: the body slightly ergonomic machine for my hands, af perform poorly, and a few buttons. Opinion: After about 4 months of use I can give you a more accurate opinion. RNLA D3300 is an excellent aps-c, the counter described above are normal for the price range, but I can assure you end up here. It also plays a reflex of the higher-end competition, just go DxOMark and make the sensor compared with that of the other. His Sony sensor has an excellent sharpness and dynamic range, although much color tends "cold" but it is not a problem. The B are great, it retrieves it, although a little less in underexposed images, also the whites depart a bit too much. jpg are excellent up to ISO 800, it starts to drop to 1600 but the noise is barely perceptible and can be used even for large prints, while in 3200 the noise is more evident, if only luminance, but you can safely use this sensitivity "standard" for prints. The 6400/12800 is better not to use them, because the noise is heavy (it takes a FX), but maybe if you expose a well ismpa little you can do. 25000 are only for the "marketing" because they are devastated by the noise. |
 | sent on 04 Gennaio 2017 Pros: sensor with excellent performance, light weight and ergonomiarnottima held at high iso Cons: so far no Opinion: I purchased this EntryLevel reflex after reading several recensionirnprovenivo by years of compact and passion for photography led me to buy a SLR this end my views economichernma meager resources at the end are more 'than satisfied and then .... photos makes the photographer, no ??? in the future I will choose 'buy more' perfomanti objectives than those of the kit but the camera body for street and landscape (favorite genres) and 'really eccezionalernla advice for those who want high performance at a fair price, you will not regret |
 | sent on 04 Dicembre 2016 Pros: Excellent entry-level. Value for money. Robustness. Quality Cons: No one ... it is an entry level and it's normal that something is missing ... Opinion: Just put a good optical and changes ... not to stop the optics of the supplied kit (for those who have bought a kit). Ok to start ... then you'll be amazed by mounting targets "serious". My first lens (outside the kit) was a Tamron 24-70 f / 2.8 Di VC USD. It 'was like going on a new planet. No need to spend thousands and thousands of euro on the camera body ... first you must exploit them, perhaps by mounting optical quality. |
|
| sent on 21 Settembre 2016 Pros: light Cons: Focus, in the dark creates messes Opinion: I have this camera for almost a year and sometimes surprises me, but sometimes I deludernIn occasion suffers the lack of light and take pictures of stars, black sky seems made crayon, even at low ISO (800) if you look well, is not a defined black problem also found in photographs with light, if you zoom in the picture is not quite clean, but maybe it's the fault of the objective basis 18-105 f3. 5rnComunque it gives a lot of satisfaction! |
user104939
 | sent on 14 Settembre 2016 Pros: Light, easy, as before exceptional reflex, light. Cons: I have only one day, but not finding them. Opinion: Bought just yesterday on Amazon with Nikon shoulder strap, lens 18-105 VR, lexar card 8 gb x200. What can I say, I am already in love. Light, beautiful to carry around. Great white balance, fine manual functions. Very bright as macchina.rnNitida, very beautiful colors, excellent due to the 24.2 megapixel Xpeed processor 4. I do not I can do without, will always be with me, at any location. |
 | sent on 09 Agosto 2016 Pros: Lightweight, easy to handle, excellent as a first reflex, battery lasting, very bright. Cons: Few of focus points, the price. Opinion: Purchased first SLR with two lenses 18-55 and 55-200 VR II VR II and paid € 550 we say that to me it went well but looking at the various prices has in fact taken a much higher cost than it really offers ... but however, beautiful car, as first reflex is EXCELLENT I'm not complaining at all of ottenuti.rnAnche results as a second camera body is quite helpful as far as weight because it is LIGHTWEIGHT and offers great ease even in the use regarding esterni.rnContentissimo keys purchase done and advice for people like me who makes it a amateur use. |
 | sent on 16 Maggio 2016 Pros: A good sensor that holds up to 3200 iso, fair burst for an entry level, enough number of keys on the body, and last but not least, 700 battery life without flash and display. Cons: Is an entry level and should be taken as such. Opinion: This small home of Nikon surprises. You can not ask for this price range anymore. Progress made at iso level is remarkable, 11 AF points are not many but allow it to go away in many situations. The burst is not photographic hunting. The sensor does its job well, always delivering full detail and high resolution images, convenient and useful in the crop phase, never loses quality and allows large format prints (beyond 50x70 without grinding). The body is light enough to avoid fatigue and the handle is all comfortable. If the lack of the movable display weighs you go to the 5000 series. Be careful with the use of optics without an internal AF motor, the machine is unprotected and it would be difficult to use them. |
 | sent on 10 Maggio 2016 Pros: really notable quality sensor! Iso held high. Compact size and lightweight! Price Cons: He did not, of course, the commands available to higher-end SLR. The body, lightweight, also appears quite fragilino ... we say that should be treated fairly with regard to everyday use. The 24 mpx, in my opinion, are even excessive! Opinion: The D3300, if it were a car, it would be a Fiat 500 with a 3.0 engine from 300 hp V6! rnIl camera body is definitely entry level, both for materials and for commands available .... but ... trust me .... it is not necessarily a flaw: with 50cc carries around really a feather! .rnVengo from D300 ( complete with a battery grip), with a sturdy dinosaur of commands and functions infinity but ... with an "engine" far less powerful and handsome that, the evidence shows (photos), takes "pay" in almost all situations this his granddaughter! RNLA D3300 is really, but at the same concentration of technology as "essential", "minimalist", almost ..... and then, very, very handsome! rnAlla order still allows you to work in manual fine without having many "keys in sight ".... in my opinion all you really need, there is! rnIl sensor "holds" fine too Iso very high ... the ISO 2-3000 are still fully fruibili.rnNon least, has an Octoberimo automatic white balance, significantly more "crafty" and reliable than, for example, the d3100 (also owned by me). |
 | sent on 27 Aprile 2016 Pros: A lot of quality to the base of NIKON, really entusiamante. Feather weight and size very appropriate. Cons: Could integrate the WiFi standard, it would increase the catchment area and whetted many to move toward SLR bodies to express their creativity by telephonists-social. Opinion: Really great job for NIKON! RnUna entry that really allows many possibilities at an attractive price. Those who want to start or re-start a new journey in the photographic world has found a companer adiscreta and fun for many small to really efficacernDimensioni occasioni.rnPLUSrnPeso piumarnSensore, but ergonomics intelligenternMINUSrnNon put the WiFi and NFC standard .... hopefully if I remember in the near modello.rnMa the real surprise is lived by downloading pictures to a PC monitor and trying to elborare some RAW files !!! SUPER! The risultai speak for soli.rnDifficile attribute the high quality of baked for an entry level file without knowing it !!! |
 | sent on 12 Marzo 2016 Pros: excellent dynamic range and quality of the photos Cons: I have not found it Opinion: The glorious Nikon D3300, capable of churning out quality files, a good and loyal companion, the many advantages, such as its commendable dynamic range, and its good iso estate, and the extreme sharpness of the picture, thanks to the fact which is devoid of the low pass. Beautiful colors of his photos, high resolution 24 mpxel, very well managed by its commendable Xpeed processor 4. A great camera to capture our memories. It 's always ready for adventure, to meet all conditions of light in which one comes to visit, and it always comes out with dignity, without sfigurare.- It' a camera that you love and appreciate. |
|
| sent on 11 Febbraio 2016 Pros: Light, small, price-performance ratio Cons: Limited diopter adjustment compared to other models Opinion: Small in size and light but with good ergonomics. When paired with lenses such as the 35mm dx or 50mm 1.8 manages to give excellent images, it does not excel in the high iso but still defends well. Very recommended as a camera to take you on trips and on all those occasions when you want to keep discreet, it also works well with the 18-55 vr ii of the kit |
 | sent on 01 Febbraio 2016 Pros: Easy to use, simple, lightweight, bright, battery life Cons: Few points of fire, resistance to iso, Opinion: I bought this d3300 as the first personal reflex and I have to say (comparing it to my father's d300) is compact lightweight and essential, in my opinion is a great handy camera to carry around to enjoy learning photography! It certainly does not give the d300's robust feelings but fortunately lost about half! After nearly 2 years of use, I must say that it does not qualitatively desire the most advanced apsc bodies like the d7200, because the sensor is that (there are differences but not so important to justify almost 1000 euros for switching to D7200)! Thanks to this camera I realized that the lenses are essential, but the car body is much less! I think I'll just change it to switch to FX! What starts to stare tight is iso hold (800 is perceived a bit of noise) and the poor precision of maf in dark environments, I think Raw making it is quite workable, but going to FX I would definitely have a lot much more! ConcludingI think it's a very good reflex, far superior to the entry level of canon, I think it's so good that it could reduce purchases of numerous high end Nikon Apsc! The battery is very large and allows you to make almost 1000 shots (without using LV). It has everything you need to be a springboard for the semipro and pro world! I recommend the boundle purchase with 18-105 to newbies, and anyone who needs a 2nd compact apsc body! |
 | sent on 16 Gennaio 2016 Pros: Easy to use and light Cons: Equipped little basic Opinion: excellent reflex whole different world than the D3200 ... Excellent resolution, as each is equipped with Nikon initially a 18-55 objective with which it is not possible to get 100% the potentials of the body ... Very good quality price. The D3300 is an excellent base machine that accompanied a good goal, it might be a way to get into the semi-professional photography. |
 | sent on 10 Gennaio 2016 Pros: Light comfortable and functional Cons: Fixed screen which does not rotate Opinion: Purchased before the honeymoon to get closer to the world of SLR, who was ecstatic to say nesono between the entry level Nikon in my opinion is the best. brilliant photos x learn how to use an SLR is the ideal ....! Unfortunately the long this passion leads you to buy more and more goals x the joy of my wife !! He he! |
|
| sent on 12 Luglio 2015 Pros: Handling ... light ... small. Cons: Problem of Iso that doubles and a few points in fire .. Opinion: Gift fattomi postgraduate, as the first machine I used my father's D7000 ... but now given the weight and convenience in carrying around this gioglielloposso only be contento.Quindi I recommend .rnHo purchased other objectives beyond the basic kit where I had a 18_55 rn vii I added a 35mm 55_300 1.8 and 4.5 / 5.6 and taste. |
 | sent on 08 Dicembre 2014 Pros: lightness and ergonomics, quality (!), external buttons ... is so small that no one will notice in the street or take seriously Cons: if I have to find one, rather than the few points of focus, or exposure meter does not last generation, or no coverage of the viewfinder, I would say the stops on the adjustment of the ISO: the fact that it will double every lap of ring I creates a bit 'of disappointment, especially in the transition from 800 to 1600 Opinion: I took it as a second camera body light to bring me always behind, in a kit with the 18-55 collapsible, which by the way is really good ... Since the first release I was amazed at the lack of weight, not seems not to have her neck, but then using it impressed me even management functions thanks to the external keys (Fn set to adjust the ISO and you're in), but above all for the image quality, even at high ISO ... in the past I have also had the D7100 and no known differences ... In short, for a total of € 403 is a bomb of the camera, I think the D610 with all the kit lenses will often at home :) rnTirando sums: I am enthusiastic and the council passionately! |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
