Nikon Coolpix P330 : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews

What do you think?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 259000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Tzeol

sent on 18 Agosto 2025

Pros: Very compact and very light!!! Good overall performance not only in relative terms (considering the dimensions of the machine and those of the sensor) but also in absolute terms. Made of plastic but of good workmanship. The start from a 24mm (equivalent) f1.8 is a nice business card. possibility to shoot in RAW!

Cons: Operationally it is a bit slow... especially when shooting in RAW you really have to "wait" two - three seconds between one photo and another.

Opinion: Promoted! It is bought for its very compact size and extreme lightness. The "starting point" of the zoom, a 24mm 1.8mm aperture, is already a reason to buy it. I also had the J1 and the J3, with their kit optics they give results certainly no more valid than those that the small P330 can give .... indeed, as colors and jpeg performance I would say the compact is superior to them! It is small and light.... so small!! This really fits in your pocket or breast pocket. With good light available, at 24 "works" in a more than satisfactory way.... Then, of course, the sensor is not an aps c nor the 1-inch one, but except for the poor ability to "blur" the background, otherwise it defends itself well.

Claudio Grasso

sent on 25 Febbraio 2016

Pros: Very bright on the wide angle area is at its best in difficult lighting conditions, very compact, good zoom 24-120, quite accurate autofocus.

Cons: Sins more serious, as would be expected given the size of the sensor, in the portraits I tried them all, but there's no way to remove the background from the subject. Manual focus impossible. The zoom control moves too fast for my taste. Also the wi-fi, which in any case does not interest me much, to work needs a Nikon accessory (WU-1A dongle) and online costs about 50 Euros (!).

Opinion: The'm trying these days, second hand car at special price of May 2013. I'll need to replace the SLR when I go to walk, only disappointment portraits, but never mind, since due to the use, will mostly landscapes . I have not understood what the battery really hard because I'm at the beginning and I am continuing to fiddle around to see how it goes, but I have the impression not much.

Puffulvio

sent on 12 Gennaio 2016

Pros: Compact, light, beautiful to look at and good photos to be for a compact, excellent in low light.

Cons: In raw it takes too long between shots and the other, and not dependent on the speed of the card ... menu too cumbersome. Manual focus ???? try this ...

Opinion: I state that I come from Pentax digital SLR and I chose a compact that would allow me to use it even with all the manual controls for the outputs read ... I paid very little (NEW, but discontinued, 137.00 Euros already shipped. ..), and and 'only because of this that I'm happy, I did not replace at all the' K50 and KS1 that I still carry with me (at least one of the two). Why??? shoot in raw become "heavy" ... it takes too much, but just too much time between shots and the other (using a sd Lexar 633x, and not 'the board the problem); ... then the colors will 'that Pentax have colors that are from another planet, but this takes out pictures a tad off! rnrnCon little light, however, being a compact is more' than good, surprised me greatly! rnrnLa manual focus ... I purposely chose a car that we had, but in practice e'inutilizzabile, given the adjustment ring tiny, ultra-sensitive and in a bad (you fuocheggia with multifunction pad to destra display ....) rnrnLa mode 'video did not try it, so I can not say ... rnrnSe the buy back? only if you had the same price, but with quite different expectations than I had two months ago! rnrn

Puffulvio

CarloZanussi

sent on 16 Gennaio 2015

Pros: weights and dimensions, quality 'image and video

Cons: it takes 5 sec waiting by one click to another, due to a slow buffer, in situations like parties or "festivals" and 'a time unacceptable.

Opinion: works well on the field the ignition and 'immediate quality' file and 'excellent thanks to a lens very valido.per landscapes and' ottima.per situations fast and 'bad because you have to wait 5 seconds between shots and the other .The objective with aperture 1.8 and 'handy in low light conditions, only closes up to f8 but with small sensors as in this case you get a great depth' of campo.fino to ISO 400 and 'fully usable, also the weight and dimensions make it a compact pocket everyday and all situazioni.essendo user of a nikon d4 I find no difficulty 'with the controls and the menu'.

Matteo86

sent on 24 Luglio 2014

Pros: compact with a very good compromise qualitàprezzo, aesthetically beautiful and screen large enough to display the settings right.

Cons: is too complex, so slow in choosing the basic settings of the type ISO, focus, is a continuous press buttons closer to the target and back close to the screen to set a fotografia.rnAltro flaw is the lack of touchscreen (easy to focus quickly an object), here you have to fiddle around with the buttons and internal settings, to get to choose manual focus, then once you have selected and clicked, you will need to go back into settings and re-insert the manual focus, really uncomfortable in many situations, last fault, not being able to see during the selection of exposure times, the true effect that will apply on the photo, you'll have to go by trial and error, taking more or less according to your experience, getting most of the time over or photo underexposed, and maybe you have half that good. rnPerde considerably in detail when the picture is enlarged slightly.

Opinion: In my opinion, a camera is overvalued, compare it to the Canon s110, such as technical structure, but comparing it to the field, with people who have the 110, I was able to assess the huge gap that exists between these two cameras, the Canon is very fast both to set the machine for a trip is to focus on the touchscreen, besides give you a preview when you select the exposure time, directly on the screen (when you click the photo, I've seen first hand how will), then I'm going to hit plenty sicuro.rnOltretutto magnifying the picture taken from the 110, does not lose much in quality, while respecting the limits of a compatta.rnPenso is a machine, which allows the practitioner to have a little more experienced, to approach a compact photographing in RAW, with several selections, you must start to become familiar with peace of mind (even a lot) to the various settings of its future scatti.rnNon I would recommend it to a photographer chand want speed, ease and comfort in realizing their scatti.rn rn