| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
  | sent on 07 Novembre 2021 Pros: Fast,silence and accurate autofocus (very),light and small (very,again), VR , minimal lens flare, strong against reverse light (aand very :) Cons: should be little bit sharp more. Opinion: If this lens %10 - %20 more sharper it should be become legendery one of uwa lens. light, only 230 gr. small, only as much as 18-55. fast,silence and corret autofocus as razor. but not sharp at all, need good light and f 7-9 aperture always (unfortunally even at 7-9 not enough sharp, sorry nikon )-: Vr is good working and you can takes photos even 1/5. i think this lens just for v-loggers. And finally add some photos at my gallery with this lens and d3400. check it out :) |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
 | sent on 29 Aprile 2022 Pros: Best value for money, very sharp and very light stabilized Excellent on Z50. Cons: not having it Opinion: Used on Nikon Z50 with FTZ, it has incredible value for money and size and weight. The fact of being in resin on such a point of view I see it as an advantage: the weight in the bag is not felt. The files with the z50 are excellent and very sharp from decidedly superior optics, I also had the very expensive 10-24 Dx there is no difference the 10-20 from its is less bright ... but it is stabilized very well. For skeptics consult the tests of Ken Rockwell: https://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/10-20mm.htm Straconsigliato on z50 with FTZ (waiting for a native optic z) excellent focus, also works the eye detect, for such an optics for 350 euros, 230 gr around I do not think there is better in any brand vote 10! |
 | sent on 23 Marzo 2021 Pros: Lightweight, compact, quiet, decent AF, very good stabilization Cons: chromatic aberrations, plastic, not very bright Opinion: Oh, God, how can you say it's sharp? As someone rightly pointed out, for architecture (at close range) the quality of the image is acceptable, good too, for foliage and objects in the distance a little less, so much so that often you have the feeling of shooting with a compact. In high contrast situations, at f/4.5 there are strong chromatic aberrations that sometimes do not even go to f/8. I do not consider the price a pro, I would definitely have preferred a more expensive lens (on 450-500 euros) but more performing in all senses. The autofocus is discreet and really quiet and the optical stabilization is very good (I managed to get shots that can also be used at 1/10s freehand, but I'm sure someone better than me would do better). Finally, it is quite plastic, the attachment is made of plastic, but on the other hand it is very compact and light. Tested on a D5300. |
  | sent on 13 Novembre 2020 Pros: The lightness and cost, the sharpness and the possibility of filters Cons: the plastic bayonet Opinion: This perspective is also part of the group of repentants, already owned in the APS-C period, now bought back for a superlight kit together with the d5600. Ke beautiful colors, an unexpected sharpness from the center to the edges to the right diaphragms, MTF tests confirm this, coupled with sensors without anti-alias filter you gaseously, distortion is present but is controlled directly in the machine. In the backlight practically absent the flare, the purple fringing idem. And then you can also use it in really very interesting FF, tried on the D780 ... azz that Optics. Manual MF is possible in Override and there is VR. That wanting more from an lens of only 227g a constructive miracle of Nikon.. sin only x the plastic bayonet. I am not an ML detractor but with a d5600 everything weighs 692g that work great ... and as also reported by fuji's CEO, long live APS-C. |
 | sent on 17 Giugno 2020 Pros: Cost, diameter filters, 10 mm, backlight Cons: Definition, purple finging. Opinion: As much as it costs, it's a great goal. If we want to say it all the sharpness is not its strong. Pros: stunning camera angle, small, light, sharpened for architecture. Cons: for naturalistic photos kneads the foliage a bit, does not have the selectors on the barrel. All in all the low brightness that everyone complains I do not see, for the photos you have to do with this lens you often find yourself closing up to 16 to have depth of field. Insoma for what it costs and its versatility I would give vot 10 but for the definition of the foliage and details generally unfortunately do not deserve them. |
 | sent on 22 Agosto 2019 Pros: Price, VR, Light Cons: Plastic, Limited Performance on Non-Next-Generation Cameras Opinion: Purchased only a month ago I did not do a lot of tests but I can confirm how much read on most forums, imperceptible and perfect focus. The lens is plastic but in the end even the latest plastics used by Nikon are excellent and if this causes the price to collapse as in this case compared to the older brother 10-24 well come. Even at 10mm the distortion is really minimal, easily corrected in post. To use it on my D7100 I had to update the firmware limiting its use anyway (you can not disable the VR nor autofocus),little bad, it is perhaps the only mole that limits it only to use with the latest generation machines. As in my case complete the kit of optics to take with you (in my case 10-20 , 18-105, 70-300) Recommended !!! |
 | sent on 10 Giugno 2019 Pros: Image quality; cost; weight and clutter. Cons: Brightness; some chromatic but negligible aberration. Opinion: You can find on the net many tests of this goal, which say more or less the same things: excellent definition especially in the center of the image and intermediate focal points, acceptable and easily correctable distortion, negligible vignette, absence of flare on the one hand, constructive weakness on the other, especially with regard to plastic graft, and some chromatic aberration. Owning one, which I use frequently for architectural photos as well as interiors, especially churches, precise the following. 1) It is comfortable to carry around, given the negligible weight and modest size. 2) From an optical point of view it provides good results from every point of view, definition in the lead. Even at the shortest focal, to notice the slight drop in sharpness on the edges you have to enlarge quite a bit. 3) Quick and flawless focus. 4) The bayonet is not metal but polycarbonate, like Formula 1 cars, jets and the best racing bikes. Is he really going to be that weak? 5) The sore spot is the brightness. The maximum opening, ranging from f/4.5 to 10 mm to f/5.6 to 20 mm, proved insufficient in various circumstances, see interiors of churches. The possibility of having a much higher angle of view than the 18-55 mm of the kit, and therefore to increase the width of the shooting area by a lot, you pay with rather slow shooting times (but the VR helps) and/or with the increase of ISOs that certainly does not benefit the result. If with the lens of the kit you can get all the desired subject into the frame, it is preferable to use the latter, which, with its opening f/3,5-5.6, at 18 mm of focal has a couple of stop advantage and therefore provides visibly cleaner results. This applies, however, only in cases where there is little light. If the light is good, however, the results are qualitatively similar and the 10-20 mm has the gear more than the large angle of field. In conclusion: for those who do not want to spend too much it is a purchase to make without a doubt. Along with a telephoto lens and a macro lens, as well as of course the kit, effectively completes the minimum kit that every amateur photographer should have. |
  | sent on 13 Febbraio 2019 Pros: Cost, Af, VR, optical performance Cons: Plasticous and luminosity Opinion: Bought used as new to €200, I think it's a bargain. The lens is very light and compact especially in comparison with my 12-24 Tokina. The construction is not bomb-proof like the Tokina, but if it is not bad it is robust. Optically it behaves very well, the 10mm distortion is limited for the focal and it corrects to perfection via software, the sharpness is decidedly good and the VR, excludable, is effective. This optics shows that if Nikon produced lenses from the non-thrust brightness it could make excellent optics at human prices, because the only true limitation of this optics is the brightness. Very helpful |
 | sent on 11 Aprile 2018 Pros: Af effective, light, precise. Vr works fine. Cons: The 4 mm more of his elder brother you are missing and with think often when you pass from static subjects to live subjects.... Opinion: The lens is pretty good, maybe a dark pelino. The lightweight construction... that many criticize is due to the latest generation of polymers that, although lightweight are ABB. Durable but the portability is super! The manual focus ring is pleasant and ABB fluid although I think the strong piece is L AF, at least in my specimen, it works really well. In the photos I miss those 4 mm to feel really free to go out with only that lens.... In the videos where there is also the crop factor instead I think is perfect for most situations. The AF works in a pretty good way. Here's a bit noisy. It's with the external microphone. |
 | sent on 27 Dicembre 2017 Pros: Excellent value for money, versatile and light, costs 1/4 of the brother "major" 10-24, has the VR. Cons: VR and AF-S can not be disconnected on cameras before 2015. Can not be used completely on Nikon digital cameras of the older generations. Opinion: An excellent lens, light and all-rounder, has now become an integral part of my "minimal" Nikon equipment: Nikon D5500, 18-55 VRII, 10-20 VR, 55-200 VRII.rnTested during several trips, he returned great images sharpness and excellent overall quality. For such an objective, a certain distortion must be taken into account, which is however already correctable with the activation of the new camera firmware. |
 | sent on 20 Settembre 2017 Pros: 72 mm filters. - Minimum weight - great value for money - range of focals. Cons: VR can be turned on and off not on all models (on D500 it is ok). Opinion: Vignette and distortion (sea horizon) irrelevant. Satisfactory sharpness. Thanks to VR made perfect shots with 1/3 sec. Structure (including the attack) in polycarbonate, so it will horrinate lovers of "metal". THE comparison with Nikon 10-24 mm. DX is inevitable. In favor of the optics under consideration: price less than half - weight halved - VR. Cons: reduced focal range - less brightness - construction. The valuation (9.6) obviously also takes into account the price. |
 | sent on 16 Giugno 2017 Pros: 10mm minimum focal length Cons: VR selector is missing Opinion: Inevitable a 10mm DX saw the "huge 2.25x" crop in 4K Nikon APS-C shooting. I was aiming to buy a fixed 10mm or zoom just to turn the 4K wide angle. RnArrived today and tried "from the window" to diaphragm 8. Haze light but well done, better than the 18-35 Af-S homologue. Too bad the vivid inscription made in thailand. It's aesthetically ugly. But there are details. The AF is silent and imperceptible. It will be a benefit in the videos. It should look good on the field. RnThe strange feeling of having it in his hands is really small and light, polycarbonate but different to "that polycarbonate" with which some optics are made. RnTurn On / Off VR button. The barrel goes up and down with the focal change, the elongation minimum around 16mm. The front lens is very small compared to the diameter of the filters but it is not very thick, the hood also serves, albeit with the shining sunlight at sunset I did not see any particular glow. If it were, it would be a great thing%2C over 100 degrees of angle the bright spots, reflections or the sun itself are often in the frame or just outside. The feeling is that it has designed the same computer that created the 40 / 2.8 ... little miracle between quality and weight. Up to 100% do not see busy colored bands between contrasted areas, but it was with low sharpness and low contrast, because my "neutral" adjustment is this. Nothing raw today. RnPrice testing .. better than I expected, it works very well close, clean colors, excellent sharpness, contrast typical of AF-S, published a photo and its central 100x100, with the data. It is curious that "property" looks at the brightest optics of the stated, both in the data on the D500 and on the pc. RnProvided on the D610. Without crop fills the full size without vignetting at 13mm, you just have to remove the hood. In practice I bought a 15-30 zoom on the Dx format and a 13-20 on Fx. Well over 110 degrees in diagonal although the focus does not work, the opticRemains in a kind of hyperfocal with a depth of field of 2 meters to infinity, with f5.0 diaphragm more open to 13mm. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
