| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
  | sent on 06 Febbraio 2025 Pros: Price, good at 55mm Cons: Pretty much everything Opinion: Really disappointed, piece of plastic that generates grainy photos. No sharpness except at 55mm, manual focus let's forget about it... Very good at the minimum focal length, but at this point I could opt for a fixed lens. The portraits come out quite well, for the rest they are wasted money... At the price at which it can be found it is already too much. Maybe I was unlucky, maybe I have a defective one, but I will have taken a good photo of it within a year |
 | sent on 01 Maggio 2021 Pros: Price (bought for 30 euros on eBay...), right size, noisy but effective VR, almost professional portraits, excellent bokeh, single focus Cons: Very noisy and problematic focus with moving subjects, slows down continuous shots, vignetting Opinion: I use this lens almost as a main lens (except for landscapes), it enjoys excellent versatility. Ok for sport, but the AF could get some headaches with the very fast subjects and then delay the shooting. The engine noises are obvious, but after a while you get used to it. I also use it for portraiture and I have to say that it behaves very well. Maybe not very sharp and suffers from vignetting in the corners increasing the focal length, but in post you can earn a lot. One of the best entry-level lenses, inferior only to the VR II version. |
 | sent on 26 Aprile 2021 Pros: In his day it was a very useful, cheap lens now on how to learn... Cons: nothing... Opinion: Had in the kit on the D5000 with the 18-55 VR + 55-200 VR Very useful in the mountains, regular quality could be done more. It is located in the used at low prices, and it is better to take it to learn in naturalistic photography. You don't even notice you have it in your bag when it's disassembled, so even in the city it's worth taking it with you. |
 | sent on 27 Settembre 2020 Pros: Cheap and compact Cons: Lagnosy Autofocus, not sharp especially when you get closer to 200 Opinion: So, I took this lens used in conjunction with my first car. Needless to tell lies, it's a lens I honestly don't love and that I would change if I had financial availability. Let's be clear, for the price it has (especially when you take it used) the job does it. But. Lagnosy autofocus, and when you go to the 200 while you focus the image "trembles" for a moment. Unclear and above all unthinkable to use when light conditions begin to become slightly difficult. I hope that Nikon can at least improve one of the cons in the future. Not both of them, but at least one. However, in the range of choice between basic objectives, it has an interesting use. The long daytime exposures. Unlike the 18-55 kit, the focus has a dedicated dial. This allows you not to accidentally change the focus when screwing any filter. |
  | sent on 02 Maggio 2018 Pros: Lightweight and great for portraits Cons: chromatic aberration in low light AF slow and noisy, dark Opinion: Taken in Kit a decade ago with the d3000. All in all not bad for what it costs, I use it mostly for portraits in the ceremonies because it very light and easy to transport. A total opening shows its limits and the AF is not a much but for portraiture is not bad, very soft and fuzzy chromatic aberrations contained in conditions of optimum illumination. Lose a lot if the light is lowered or subject to long distance, not good for the sport because the AF is not really fast. |
 | sent on 15 Ottobre 2017 Pros: Pro: Sharpness, versatility, clutter, excellent blur, presence of the super - high, new price when I took it and now in use, focal length, weight, robustness, good image quality across the frame (price / performance). Cons: Cons: Building (obviously not a lens goal), dark, af and vr noisy, af uncertain and slow, minimal focus distance, TA aberrations, in general all these problems are accentuated in the dark, chromatic aberrations on strong contrasts . Opinion: Already said everything in pros and cons. School goal, so suitable for beginners who approach the telephoto world for the first time. I still have this lens and I use it now only on Nikon D3000, battle reflexes, for events and events (it draws little attention from those who have too long hands). The current version is currently on sale: Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f / 4-5.6G VR II at a very low price. |
 | sent on 24 Agosto 2016 Pros: sharpness-versatile-footprint Cons: built-dark Opinion: I do not understand if my copy is scary ... Sharp also 200mm rnrnrn (http://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?l=it&t=1633147) rnrnrn, a pretty good bokeh rnrnrn (http: // www .juzaphoto.com / galleria.php? l = en & t = 1475438) rnrnrn, not cluttered ..... the fact that it is a kit lens, do not presume that is not worth anything ... I have kept for my aps-c and continues to give me a lot of satisfaction, in spite of those who say it is a fund of bottiglia.Soggettivamente, then, give him a nice 9. !! |
 | sent on 17 Aprile 2016 Pros: Focus better, the presence of the vr - albeit not great, the price (on eBay or used) took 80 €, focal length, weight, Cons: Sharpness so and so ... to TA bad, it is very dark, and noisy vr af, af uncertain, minimum focusing distance, aberrations in TA, in general, all these problems are accentuated in the dark, Opinion: Unclear (contours on my TA to appear "smeared"), it becomes acceptable to virtually f8. Impossible to use at RT for aberrations and sharpness. Dark, low light is difficult to manage the background noise, and VR is not much help. Bought at 80 €, is a useful all-rounder that basically has a nice yield, he left me the shots I am very satisfied, especially for the yield of the very pleasant blurry for the rest ... just remove the defects in PP. If you close a little after all it is quite clear. Good for iniziare.rn |
 | sent on 14 Aprile 2016 Pros: Price, weight, strength Cons: quality, sharpness at maximum aperture, dim, slow autofocus Opinion: Background: I am a beginner and beyond that I possess just another lens (Nikon AF-S DX 18-55mm f / 3.5-5.6 G VR), both paid the price of one from a friend who had used them for a few months. What struck me negatively of this model is mainly the sharpness at maximum aperture, really impractical; regarding the portraits you save, but sometimes the autofocus is slow / uncertain and the VR could be more effective. Over the 800/900 ISO Af has some problems. All in all, for a beginner like me is just fine to practice the focal more and not to be making a mortgage. |
 | sent on 08 Agosto 2014 Pros: Great price, versatile, within its limits one blurred pleasant, good quality Cons: sharpness at maximum aperture, Opinion: For the price range in which it is located is a great lens to combat. It has a good build quality, although it is not very clear, especially at maximum aperture and has limitations with chromatic aberrations. Overall I would recommend if you do not want to exceed the expenses and take home something; recommended for those who have to take the handle as me. |
 | sent on 21 Luglio 2014 Pros: competitive price, fun to use even if you are not professionals Cons: dim Opinion: Despite the negative opinions I recently bought this lens. I state that I am a neophyte who just is trying to navigate this complex world. I decided to buy this light because I wanted to try to work on my longer focal lengths without spending a fortune. I am very satisfied with my purchase. It 's fun to use to make the pictures and to play with depth of field, is a lightweight and easily transportable. It makes you feel immediately a "good photographer" even if you're a shoe like me. And 'bright enough to be used outdoors and in bright normali.srnLo highly recommend it to those who, like me, you are a beginner and want without spending a fortune, try to use different approaches. Obvious that the super experts and megaprofessionisti consider it crap but, you know, who knows more, see, since I do not know anything but I see very little of what I see I like you very much! Rn |
 | sent on 27 Marzo 2014 Pros: fairly robust price Cons: Sharpness at maximum focal really scandalous, intolerable noise, aberrations, af very uncertain Opinion: It 'is currently one of my goals, but unfortunately not very satisfactory. The sharpness at maximum focal length will literally bless, not to mention the noise and aberrations at the highest levels especially for photos in low light. He defends pretty well with portraits but we are not at lofty levels of course. Sometimes the colors look fake and it is constantly increasing with the darkness always in the dark ... plus the af vr becomes very uncertain and slow to stabilize. One lens dedicated exclusively to beginners and those who are content with little or nothing. |
 | sent on 09 Febbraio 2014 Pros: Lightness, VR Cons: Sharpness, aperture, noise, colors, aberrations, construction, af, Dark, Vr slow Opinion: Target really poor and disappointing. Color rendering ugly, poor sharpness and build quality really poor. Use as a second lens on the second body to always carry is not that great: af unusable by ISO 800. Poor plastic body that allows a considerable lightness but a very poor quality. Subdued compared to 18 55 nothing to do with with 70 200 2.8 vr. Vr lento.rnVoto 6 |
 | sent on 06 Marzo 2013 Pros: Good construction, light weight, I would say satisfactory sharpness especially in relation to the price, nice blurred portraits. Cons: Vr not measurably effective ...... better to stay on longer time to 1/125 ...... Opinion: It 's the lens with which I performed one of my favorite shots, especially portraits, I was always surprised by its more' than good definition, if it were not for the bias resulting from its economy class ...... acquire the deserved judgment of great lens ..... obviously in 'use with light which enables management to F 4. Recently, driven by the desire of a definition, presumably better, I bought the 50mm f1.8, with which I am effettuanto the first portraits. The comparison (not really ecquo ...) I can only say that the 55-200 f4-5, 6 vr not 'mica to be laid in the cellar ..... quite the opposite! Apparently the photo d 'published example below are the major users of quest' perspective ....... judge for yourself! rn |
 | sent on 27 Novembre 2012 Pros: Lightweight and rugged, price ok. Cons: Sharpness at maximum focal length. Opinion: Good lens for what it costs, light and well built, the blur for portraits is very nice ... sometimes RNA, the autofocus is not very precise and then Valentino and I expected more from the VR system, which is not so effective. RNIN all ways, if you want a telephoto zoom at this price you do not think twice. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
