| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
  | sent on 25 Giugno 2024 Pros: I.Q., DNG format, Razor-sharp lens, fastness, weight, essential menu Cons: No tropicalization for possible use in difficult conditions Opinion: At the current price on the used (which I think will hardly go down further), you have the possibility to use a full frame body and lens combination in a weight of about 650 gr... The menus are reduced to the essentials in perfect Leica style but what you need for a purely photographic use is all there. Fast and precise in autofocus while the manual focus is very reminiscent of the experience of an M lens. Very quiet and discreet, thanks also to the central shutter (even in mechanical use you can't hear it...) I found it excellent for street photography etc. The stabilized lens has personality and excellent image quality, razor-sharp even at full aperture. Moreover, the optics were also used on the subsequent Q2 and Q3 models, confirming its goodness. In addition, the Raw file, being in DNG standard, has already applied the necessary corrections, so it can be safely used with older versions of Lightroom, etc. It makes you want to go out on the street to photograph, giving you an "analogue" experience and, more importantly, allowing you to take home many excellent shots. The choice of the 28 mm equivalent on FF sensor with service diaphragms allows you to have a lot of depth of field, but when you need it you just have to open the diaphragm to obtain a pleasant blur, useful for. e.g. for ambient portraits, etc. If you have more feeling with a 35mm equivalent frame, you can easily use it for this use as well while maintaining sufficient resolution. Personally, shooting only in Dng, I don't use the crop in the camera but I crop very quickly in PP if I realize that I have composed wider than I should. |
 | sent on 21 Marzo 2023 Pros: Lens quality, construction materials, a little gem. Cons: continuous focus that does not go at all, they could even not insert it, problems with dust infiltration, you have to cover the microphones with insulating tape, electronic viewfinder not at the levels of the current on the market. Opinion: You say, but in 2023 it is still valid. NI. It has superlative image quality, color rendering. Materials of the highest quality. In the cons what I put. Continuous focus not good and lack of being able to change lens, but those who buy a leica know what they are buying otherwise it goes on something else, surely if I have to do sports I use my canon r6, this leica q was born for lovers of pure reportage. problems with dust infiltration, microphones must be covered with insulating tape, electronic viewfinder not at the levels of current on the market. Conclusions, to so many defects and so many defects, either you love it or you hate it. |
 | sent on 02 Agosto 2022 Pros: A top image quality. Cons: Maybe the price, the battery life. Opinion: It's a small photographic dream that comes true, in addition to landscape photography I love street and reportage, I had turned on a Richo gr3, large, I repeat great camera, but for the problems I have to the eye, shooting from the display was a problem, so going to the RCE of Livorno, exquisite people, they proposed me this Leica Q kept very well at a fair price, the moment I took it in my hand the feeling clicked and I decided to take it, I had a Nikon Z7ii and Z6ii, I gave back the Z6ii, with some lenses that I did not use and the small Richo and now the Q is in my hands. I only took a few shots, but the images I saw in the MEC made me realize that this sumilux 28mm 1.7 is a portent. This is a camera that gives a lot of satisfaction and even the lens that at first gave me to think about being a fixed 28mm made me change my mind with this beginning a new and different relationship with photography. I am fully satisfied with the choice made, we mean in addition to the merits there are also the defects as in ALL the cameras, but in this case the merits outweigh the defects in a big way. |
 | sent on 22 Febbraio 2022 Pros: lens, dexterity, manual focus, dng file, solid and excellent materials, metric scale on the barrel, saving settings to the PC, Cons: non-tropicalized, lack double slot, EVF magnification, power key, video key, joystick, no metric scale in EVF, no user profile names, cost. Opinion: I have owned it for several years now, amazing lens, camera body with badly thought design choices! For a simple use, point and click, the machine has been designed in a sensible way, in fact it presents everything you need for street photography, travel, reportage or the time ring, the diaphragm ring, the manual focus ring. Yet despite this simplicity of use, which Leica is famous for as making it a lifestyle, there are a few things that make it cumbersome. So I report the things that I did not like: 1) The joystick in addition to being tiny and flat, if designed for photography alone is inconvenient, as it allows you to move the focus point with the various arrows, but if you want to reposition in the center it does not work, in its place if you click in the center of the joystick the video starts. So to bring the AF back to the center you have to double tap on the LCD. 2) EVF really resolute, now I do not want anything under 3mpx, but despite this, the refresh is slow especially in low light conditions or with slow times, because the machine reproduces the preview when you click halfway through the shutter (this thing can not be deactivated). In addition, the magnification of the EVF in my opinion is not the best, throwing in the eye you have the feeling of being inside a box, you can see the inner walls of the viewfinder. 3) power button, really ugly and uncomfortable, having the two modes Af-S and C makes the ignition annoying, in fact on the leica Q2 it has been eliminated, but even here they did not put the classic screw button of the leica M that could be useful for the mechanical remote shooting or for a soft release button 4) REC button on the upper shell, really useless for those who do not make videos, also absurd that you can not program at will, on the leica Q2 has been solved by adding the pressure on the compensation ring and then set at will the chosen option as the WB. 5) user profiles, these are really convenient and I use them as I created the four presets for the various shooting scenarios, but I find it absurd that if I click on the rear FN button it does not show me the name I assigned to the profiles themselves, so you have to go to memory. 6) absence of tropicalization, with what it cost at the time, absurd that they did not immediately think of making it suitable to withstand the weather, especially being fixed optics, in this case to solve the problem I used electrician tape in critical points (between body and lens where there is the macro switch, so I do not macro, so I do not macro, tape on the case back and microphone holes) and to date despite having been everywhere the sensor is clean. 7) flicker and banding in the presence of artificial lights and in certain shooting conditions, it occurs both in preview and in rare cases also in photos. 8) poor general grip in addition to the fact that on the back back there is no skin, so first I solved with the thumbs up, then removed and replaced with the front grip. 9) buffer not really fast especially if you make multiple shots, it also happened to me in an episode to have 2 corrupt raw files, changed the SD. 10) White balance, the machine in "WB-automatic" shows colors always faithful to reality, on this leica is a guarantee, what I did not like is the absence of the WB Shift or the ability to customize the individual color channels to give a different look if necessary. Having made this realistic review in my opinion the cost of the machine mainly justifies the lens, the quality of the materials and the simplicity of the whole system as well as the choice of raw DNG files that I share (same thing does Ricoh and Sigma) I find them much more comfortable and versatile than any other brand. Moreover, if you can live with the limits described above I would say that it is to be preferred over the Leica Q2. |
 | sent on 09 Novembre 2020 Pros: Manoeuvrability, extraordinary optics Cons: Battery life, virtually useless video mode, not tropicalized Opinion: A compact FF that mounts a Summilux (which then Summilux is not, given the diaphragm 1.7) is already a great thing, without considering the minimum focus distance that compared to the Summilux and Summicron series, and more generally the M and R series have a limit of 0.70m, on the Q we can even take advantage of the macro, which however will work at f2.8 once the macro ring is turned. The video mode unfortunately remains marginal, no possibility to use an external microphone, exposure that works only on compensation and hunger rates at multiples of 30, with relative shutter times, so not only during recording there are annoying changes of exposure but also the presence of flickering is high. A real shame because it would have been a great body B (C, in my case) for those who already work with Panasonic's S1h aunts. Excellent for the streets since the 28, better than the 35 in urban environments is ideal, too bad for the lack of tropicalization that we find in the next model Q2, but all this stuff had already been said. |
 | sent on 31 Ottobre 2020 Pros: photo quality,handling Cons: cost, battery life and sensor that gets dirty easily Opinion: a machine that costs 4000 euros and is not even tropicalized with sensor that gets dirty after two three exits and then to clean the sensor ask you 350 euros plus VAT it seems to me that it is not worth buying it. The first time I saw dust in the sensor I didn't believe my eyes, I cleaned the monitor to plus I can't be incredulous that you could dirty a sensor with fixed lens. Then I took her to Venice and the mountains not to Africa. Then when the store asked me for 500 euros because rightly the service you pay I decided to keep it like this and that when the dirt on the sensor is excessive I throw it in the garbage. My Canon EOS 5D Mar4k IV with which I did ill Rajastan, Gujarat, Peru, Bolivia and Morocco to which I change my goals I had to clean the sensor only once. |
 | sent on 31 Ottobre 2020 Pros: Fixed focal, f/1.7, ease of use, handy, light and solid, file quality, precise AF. Cons: Non-interchangeable optics, battery life, fixed focal, price, cost of Leica branded accessories. Opinion: My favorite when I go to shoot at weddings. It allows me to do an entire wedding (with SD cards and spare batteries) without any problems. Very useful in various photographic situations, he never missed a shot, giving me shots of considerable impact!!! Of course, given the peculiarity and cost, it is not a camera for everyone... but I'm really recommending it to everyone for the and motions and qualities it gives! It's Leica... and I said it all!!! #daswiesentliche |
  | sent on 26 Febbraio 2020 Pros: Practical (well designed), build quality (well done), EVF, appeal, relatively timeless to be an electronics: silver grip for the most retro charm; grain of black and white to high ISO so good that you want to eat it (as they do not know). Cons: nobody if you know what you buy (it's a non-interchangeable optics machine and fixed focal, so it covers specific needs; maybe the price that forced me to wait for the q2 release to find an opportunity for me to approach; desire for Q2 that brings the crop in machine to perfection for absolute for megapixel availability; it's addictive and addictive to Q2. Too bad not to use it as much as you deserve since my main system is other. Opinion: Camera almost perfect of its kind, just because perfection does not exist, excellent for street, travel, even portraits set as long as you know how to use the 28mm in these junctures; everything in the right place where you expect it, reading the manual really useless; very natural electronic viewfinder, second only to the most recent models mounted in the leica house (SL/SL2/Q2); pleasant to hold, you want to use it. Stratospheric optics in both yield and use. |
 | sent on 16 Settembre 2019 Pros: After almost a year of use for weddings what to say? Machine and optics make it a superlative machine, the yield at low lights is stratospheric, the detail is hallucinatory already at 1.7.The autofocus is practically instant an instant and does not miss a beat, I do almost all the wedding reportage. Cons: Lack of double slots, very limited buffer and in burst shots crashes for a few seconds. Opinion: It is a machine designed and designed for those who report. The machine is quick and silent, does not miss a shot in the fire, the only real flaw is the lack of a double slot just to have extra security. I recommend it to those who want a "almost perfect" car and the money it costs is worth absolutely all. |
 | sent on 11 Febbraio 2019 Pros: 28mm Summilux F/1.7, performance of a full frame sensor, compact body with simple and appealing design Cons: Absence of a double memory slot and non-interchangeable lens Opinion: The Leica Q is a minimalist and intuitive machine. It imposes the compromise of a fixed non-interchangeable optics to obtain large images, without the need to carry huge weights. The MACRO function is not to be overlooked and allows you to get great shots close together. In my opinion, the only downside to this machine is the lack of a double memory slot. The double slot would guarantee the back up of the images and then made the Q useful also for professional aspects. With the Leica Q it is possible to "focalize" both in automatic and in manual. In manual, the focus peaking and zoom assist functions help the focus setting in a splendid way, but it is always possible to change focus system very quickly by simply acting on the relative ring. Also, on the Q you can find focus functions like Face detection, and the touch and shoot function that makes it very similar to a smartphone. If you are looking for a reliable travel companion, which at the same time is light, a single body and a single lens, the Leica Q is the right choice. |
|
| sent on 24 Gennaio 2019 Pros: Fast and responsive machine, gorgeous and crisp optics Cons: Price (especially accessories), battery life Opinion: Who buys the Q does it for a specific use, so I can not come to say that it is not a machine for portraits, because it is not created with that intent. It is a machine created to make street, reportage, to be at the center of the situation. And it does it extremely well. It has few buttons and a few rings and for this it reduces everything to the essential, the photograph. After 2 years of tests and days with this gem I decided to buy it and since then I have not carried around my A7rII, which I used to use for street with only a fixed 28mm lens. Really great and amazing. |
 | sent on 01 Dicembre 2018 Pros: Fantastic machine, beautiful, fast, and optically exalted. Cons: Price (relative) Opinion: Beautiful car, bought new in lieu of the Leica mi X2 (also a really good car) and I have to say that there is a quality train in this little German masterpiece. The lens is really phenomenal and combined with a right sensor with honest 24 MP that make the photos really read even to manage but that allow crop (35 and 50 mm already in the car) with a very good resolution. A specialized machina and built with the best materials and technologies, the price is not excessive if you consider that a FF with similar optics costs even more. I can not do anything but recommend it to those looking for a machine of high quality, ready to use and for a use that goes from street to reportage. |
 | sent on 20 Giugno 2018 Pros: Dynamic range, autofocus, high ISO. Optics to say the least amazing! Construction Cons: For me Nothing Opinion: I come from Reflex, newly contested Leica was love at first sight! I use it often in churches and street! It responds beautifully and at the high and low lights splendid in portraits contextualized, landscapes, also proven in macro! A real bomb! The 28 F 1.7 makes stratospheric numbers! Sure costs! Ma......se one has a chance to buy it........ don't wait! Rated 10! |
 | sent on 19 Febbraio 2018 Pros: Reactive, fast, practical, well-designed, electronic viewfinder, high image and constructive quality, central shutter Cons: Covers specific needs Opinion: You pull it out of the bag, you grab it and what you need is all there. Enclosed in a couple of well-placed buttons, two or three ring nuts in the right place, a lens that can not be removed (but that much you would never remove), an electronic viewfinder that seems (almost) to look in an optical and a fast and powerful electronics, the central shutter Extremely quiet. The Q... If you are a street photographer, you probably appreciate (in addition to the focal length) its responsiveness and speed. If you are a reportagista, as well. Along with these also the fact that you can use the ring nuts to set the values of the camera, when you use (often) as I do in manual and can understand only by looking at it from above what shutter values you have set. If you love to use telephoto lenses, you don't do anything. If you're looking for flexibility, either. If you do "close up" portraits, maybe you won't need it. What model likes to see her nose deformed by wide angle, bigger than it is in reality? If you do set portrait instead, yes. If you're a pixel freak, maybe it won't be enough. Because it is true that used to 28 gives 24 mpx, but used with the frame of 35 te ne 16 and if croppata according to the frame of 50 about 8. Pochini, for those who have delusions of greatness. More than enough for the "normal" use that you make of a photograph. 8 mpx are printed with more than good quality even on a A3 +, without interpolating and print in a magazine without problems. Its RAW (DNG) are Gestibilissimi and easy to work, as traditionally Leica. The yield of the Summilux 28 ASPH (even with the crop of the frame equivalent to 50) is of the highest level. Ease of use and effectiveness, as well. Personally in some cases, I miss the optical viewfinder a bit, but you can not have everything from life and the electronic one of the Q is at the top (I made comparisons with Sony A7II, Olympus EM1, Leica SL and Fujifilm X100F, X-Pro2 and X-E3). And then, to be honest, I'm getting a little used to it, despite everything. Today in my camera bag they have placed a Leica Q and another Fujifilm APS-C camera that covers the focal above the 50 equivalent (for those rare times I need them). An essential system, which has a lot of limitations, but that in Street Photography and Reportage has specific advantages. Ease of use, speed, image quality, essentiality, simplicity, substance. |
|
| sent on 26 Dicembre 2017 Pros: magic Cons: nothing Opinion: It is a perfect machine for the narrow set for portraits, even half-length. excellent file - excellent evf - I would say simply magical 1.7 focus that gives an extremely comfortable satisfaction to always carry with you. I use it with the 35 mm frame then use if you need the remaining part (28 mm shooting) obviously with the dng file - really an object that if one tries it falls in love |
 | sent on 07 Novembre 2017 Pros: Construction, lightness, file quality, noise resistance Cons: The EVF dielectric correction ring moves when carried to the shoulder strap Opinion: I have owned it for about a year and are fully satisfied with it. Needless to point out that his vocation is the street, given the size, the focal length of 28 mm. By day, in the street, the use is almost always af / 8 in hyperfocal, as the lens is shown on the lens for the distances of focus. Fast-fitting that works well even in impossible light conditions, it quickly engages even when the reflex fails to focus. It is essential, easy to use with all controls in the right place. The high ISO file quality is excellent and the black and white that you can get from this machine has something magical. I always wear it when I want to be light but I do not want to compromise on quality. The price is high, but if you look good, with a body like this and a 28 mm of this quality the price is correct. For 4000 euros, in Leica, one does not even get a lens for "M" or "SL". I recommend going to try it in oneLeica store to realize the excellent quality of the product. I only found one problem: the continuous adjustment of the EVF correction wheel for rubbing when carried by the shoulder strap, but this is a little compared to what this machine offers. EVF extraordinary, very responsive and with a good definition. Great manual focus assistant with zoom in and focusing on red focus points (the color can be changed in options). Good dynamic range that allows excellent post-production recoveries. I can only recommend it to those who can adapt to only 28 mm, but want to travel lightly with a product of excellent quality. |
 | sent on 02 Settembre 2017 Pros: Incredibly beautiful viewfinder. Maneuverability, convenience, solidity, quality and incisiveness of files, low noise even at high ISO Cons: Battery life and lack of additional grip. You need to buy a second battery and additional grip. Opinion: The dream in the drawer was to handle a real Leica and use it at its best. With Leica Q I realized it. Small, solid, essential and yet complete. Unrepeatable and definitely Leica quality files. An unusual definition, glossy and brilliant colors, and a blur comparable to a high-end, high-gloss reflector. I own a D750 that I would buy again, but with Leica Q it was love at first sight. If I can ... between ice, use Leica.rnCerto is not suitable for certain types of photos (animals, sports etc) but for the street it is also unsurpassable thanks to the totally silent shot. I knew that the fixed 28mm was a limit. Instead, it is a stimulus, and the files, even as much as possible, keep the same definition of the original file. High ISO resistance is impressive. The cost? Suitable for the product. A beautiful technology to use. |
user120016
 | sent on 24 Agosto 2017 Pros: Sharpness, brightness, ergonomics, essentiality Cons: Nobody Opinion: Defining it compact is a sacrilege. Full-size 26 MP sensor with unsurpassed noise resistance, worthy of a high-end professional. All in little space and little weight. It portrays the essence of photography. Unique lens, not interchangeable, bright and engraved as in Leica's best tradition. The focal length is perfect, stimulates thinking about composition, moving and searching for original shooting points. The electronic viewfinder is one of the best on the market. Comfortable to handle, all the controls where you expect to find them. Feeling right away. The price is appropriate to the jewel of mechanics and technology that you bring home. |
 | sent on 24 Maggio 2017 Pros: Drawn with his head, after asking thousands of photographers what they wanted to have in their ideal camera. FF sensor, superlative optics, gorgeous sensor, all controls in place, beautiful to die, fast. Cons: Costa, but it's Leica and you know. And everyone is worth it. You can not write copyright data in Exif data, but it's just a question of fw. For the rest perhaps tropicalization is missing ... Opinion: After decades of Canon up to 1Dx and 5D3 with various optics L, I decided to change. I did not enjoy the holidays if I was forced to drag me kg of equipment. The Q does everything: the 28mm is similar to the smartphone's perspective, f / 1.7 makes it unique even at night, macro working allows original photos. All in a finally modern, well-studied, beautiful, and durable body. Besides, I've used it sometimes to basketball and it does very well! It's fast as shaken and shaky, MaF is more than enough and holds the 2-3,000 Iso. Finally a multipurpose camera to always carry. In addition to the Q I was forced to buy the T to have a super wide-angle (zoom 11-23) and a portrait and macro canvas, the gorgeous and expensive 60 / 2.8 Macro TL, a glass of unexpected quality. RnLeica understood For years that the reflex would die, with the advent of electronic sighters, and Q's EVF is gorgeous, without lags, delays or skiing. I wonder how Canon and Nikon stayed on the pile to see the merchandiseThat change. Nikon is now overtaken by Sony in the FF industry, Canon risks big ... |
 | sent on 23 Maggio 2017 Pros: Ease of use, ease of use, fast and accurate AF, brightness and three-dimensionality of images, electronic viewfinder etc. etc. Cons: Do not have it ..... as well as minorities already described but in my opinion negligible. Opinion: I bought this car a few months ago ... and it was immediately love at first sight. The Summilux 28 mm 1.7 stabilized is a true gateway. Three dimensionality and sharpness make each image unique and of great visual impact. The saturation and brilliance of the colors without dominant, greatly facilitate post-production work. The AF is fast and accurate every time, even in low light conditions. The electronic viewfinder is unique in its kind ... you have to look inside to be able to understand! Many believe that spending over 4000 euros for a compact is pure madness ... I assure you that the emotions and the satisfaction that this machine can repay you will pay off well every penny you spend. |
 | sent on 06 Agosto 2016 Pros: Robust, quality pictures, nice grain at high ISO, exceptional definition, discreet, bright viewfinder. Cons: Price (but it is a Leica) and failure tropicalization. Opinion: Purchased by a month for a street use only. Fully confirms all that one can expect from a Leica. When you take in hand you feel the strength and quality of materials. The baked files are of a truly superb definition (and this comes from someone who normally use with Nikon D4S 70-200 / 2.8 and 14-24 / 2.8). When larger photos made you realize, in detail, of a higher sharpness. 28 is perfect for the whole of the street photo. The AF is fast and accurate. A little noise already at ISO 1600 but the grain is nice and still be eliminated in pp. And 'the ideal machine to carry around forever because small and silent. The cap is easily lost but must be taken not because it must always be ready to shoot. |
  | sent on 11 Luglio 2016 Pros: Ease of use, excellent files, small and discreet. Cons: The lens cover comes off too easily, slow to develop long exposures. Opinion: The thing that I like about this camera are files that churns; you can practically shoot directly in jpg with equally good processing margins. rnIl viewfinder and autofocus are also really good in low luminosità.rnRiguardo to 28mm conditions, I think it is the fixed lens with which you can do everything, my favorite, and I think it's an important thing to like to like this view also the fotocamera.rnPiccola, discreet and extremely robust, the Leica Q is a machine always carry with you, always ready to shoot at any situazione.rnFotografando in the dark and with very long times on the room processing takes a long time and this is one of the major flaws that I riscontrato.rnAltro flaw is that the lens cap does not stay quite anchored to the same; very easy to lose it or drop it ruining the paint, so many that now to remedy the thing around senza.rnIl touchscreen it is in my opinion a bit slow and reattivo.rnNel complex is a jewel Adorableile which may enjoy beautiful shots. |
|
| sent on 24 Febbraio 2016 Pros: A machine easy to use, all at hand keys. Cons: No Leica dedicated processor for DNG files. Opinion: Leica camera style, color, resolution, three-dimensional, all is perfect shots in any situation without needing the classic fill-in, the flash can be useful only in the evening, I took with both Nikon and Canon, but the printed files of Leica are another category, colors and three-dimensionality to the highest, jpeg files levels are perfect, just slightly in retouched according to taste, i find it somewhat difficult to process DNG files also with Lightroom accompanying program, however, also taking forever in two sizes, I do not see the need as early as jpeg it is perfect, hard to go wrong with the monitor display that gives you a preview of the shooting display. 10 Praise to the camera. |
 | sent on 24 Agosto 2015 Pros: A compact which is not compact. Minimalist and functional with a few keystrokes, only what they need. I found still uncertainties in the use, even in difficult situations. Cons: Maybe the price, but it is politics Leica. Opinion: Proven by case. I had to reverse, having no sympathy with the M series rangefinder viewfinder at the top. I made a bargain and now use it as the first body. At high ISO in low light gives excellent files. AF more than ready. The weight is there and you feel, but not in a disturbing way. It falls well in hand and the controls can be reached well. I can only advise those who want to use a well-calibrated to the photographer, both pro and amateur. |
 | sent on 15 Agosto 2015 Pros: AF speed and accuracy by reflex, EVF among the finest on the market, made in color and black and white "leica style", bright lens and of the highest quality, compact body and discreet (to be a full frame), electronic shutter up to 1 / 16,000 that lets you use the 1.7 aperture even in bright sunlight. Cons: None but trifles solved with a firmware upgrade. Opinion: A unique machine with unique requirements. The only full frame compact with 28 mm and EVF integrated. I am really amazed by the quality and finesse that encloses the Leica Q.rnCi are few words to spend all boils down to: absolute quality. The cost is high, but considering riding a 28 Summilux 1.7 we can also stare.rnPer all I care is the top. |
 | sent on 20 Giugno 2015 Pros: Built, maintained and pleasant grain at high iso, no lag between when the shutter button and the actual, 10 fps, 28 mm SUPER, macro, EVF spatial frames style rangefinder for compo, very Leica Cons: leave it in your bag and do not use it Opinion: I just tried it, and I'm meditating on buying a car .... is final (for my style, of course). well ... it grab colors and three-dimensional are phenomenal !!!!! certainly for the street it is the perfect machine to use in 28 crop and 35 mm (50 not my favorite focal, but I consider it very useful even on this machine, but it can always serve) .rnin manual gives feelings ... ago really you want to come scattare.rnmolti will wonder why not 24 or 35 ... simple ... because a car from 4000 euro must also be equipped with something special, which breaks some schemes, and above all it requires a certain mastery of focal ... nikon also proposed two old rangefinder in the Ti film in 28 and 35 (at the time and caused a sensation) ... 28 is the focal street in my opinion ... more than 35 ... modern requirements ... Today everything is more wide, more crowded, 28 for me is the "new" ... you just 35mm capIrlo and get accustomed to ... |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
