| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
  | sent on 06 Agosto 2025 Pros: Dimensions, internal zomm, possibility of mounting screw filters, focal range Cons: Edge sharpness above 20 mm Opinion: I've been using it for two years and it has an excellent focal range. With just over 400 grams you are covered from 15 to 35 mm. It is inconspicuous and so even in the street it is inconspicuous. I didn't put among the cons the fact that it is f4 because if you want a zoom with this focal range and even light then you can't have a larger aperture, you buy it for what it is and it does its job. I preferred it to the sigma 10-18 precisely because of the greater focal range and because I use it at 24 for panoramas. At higher focal lengths it loses sharpness at the edges, it's just to pay a little attention in the composition and by playing it well you also save yourself the hassle of adding vignetting. |
 | sent on 02 Agosto 2025 Pros: focal range, size, weight, internal zoom, screw filters, WR Cons: edge/corner solving, f/4, price, invasive backlight ghosting in some situations Opinion: Had it for two years and then sold it because f/4 for gym use is very limiting. For outdoor use and where the aperture is not a problem, the lens is a good compromise between quality and weight/dimensions. AF is also good for dynamic situations, it does not reach the performance of LM lenses but does not leave too much to be desired. In backlight it presents ghosting with the presence of the polygon deriving from the slats, it does not always do it but when it does it is marked and very visible. In the corners it loses a lot in terms of resolution, it is then up to the user to understand how important this is. The price, as with almost all Fuji lenses, is a hair too high. In combination with the 55-200 it can form an excellent kit for light outputs, covering a nice focal range (obviously with lower yields than other solutions, but physics imposes compromises). |
  | sent on 17 Luglio 2025 Pros: Dimensions, construction, internal zoom, screw filters, optical quality, resistance to pressure Cons: Certainly not the ideal choice for photographing the Milky Way. Sometimes 10mm can be a narrow wire, the ideal would have been 9mm Wide side. Sometimes I sometimes want a minimum focusing distance of about 5cm less, especially when I have very small flowers in the foreground. It may have a slightly higher resolution. Opinion: I have been using this lens for a few years, used both on 24, 26 and 40 Mpxl sensors. I manage to take home the shot on 90% of the occasions. The construction is top of the class, and the dimensions are just right. Contrary to what you read, the resolution and sharpness of the lens are very good, for pixel peeper and fans of hyper realism who then upload the photographs to Instagram this is not the right lens. For everyone else it can be an almost closed-eyed choice. Sharpness at the edges a little back from the center, the question would be, how often do you have an important element in your image in the corners? Recommended for all landscape photographers! P.s. The variation of the angle of view during focusing is very limited, so you can do excellent focus stacking without finding the photo cropped in post and having to rack your brains about how to compose the image at some focusing distance, not a small detail, for example in the past I used a Tamron 15-30mm 2.8 and it happened to me more than once to throw the shot at home just to this reason. |
user250289
 | sent on 28 Febbraio 2025 Pros: Construction, tropicalization, compactness, possibility of mounting threaded filters. Cons: Sharpness at the edges/corners is poor already at 10/20mm focal lengths, which improves (not much) only by closing down to f8. At 24mm the sharpness is insufficient even in the center. Opinion: Enthusiastically purchased the new tropicalized version in 2020, on XT4 I immediately encountered the unacceptable defects described above. It was then replaced by the 8-16 which, although with much larger dimensions, weight and price, was decidedly superior. However, on the XH2, even the 8-16 showed real resolution limits, which led me to change the system... But that's another story. |
 | sent on 06 Novembre 2022 Pros: Sharp, small and light, and above all it holds well the 40 MPX of the XH2! Cons: Slight drop in performance above 20mm. Usual plastic hood and aesthetically unwatchable. Opinion: I use this zoom from the first output of the non-WR version. I have always liked it for its great versatility, lightness and not exaggerated size. Moreover, having had at least 4, I have always had excellent copies and they have never given me problems, except for the physiological drop in sharpness, especially at the edges at the higher focal lengths. But from 10 to 18 mm has always been a blade already at TA and up to f8. I must say that this new version, despite having the same optical scheme as the previous one, even on the XT3 seems to me to have a sharpness and a higher microcontrast. In short, the impression is that it is really very, very sharp. And the beauty is that it does not lose anything even on the 40 mpx sensor of my XH2. I am very satisfied. |
 | sent on 23 Novembre 2021 Pros: Construction, sharpness, internal zoom Cons: Aperture, cost Opinion: Excellent wide-angle lens, nothing to complain about. However, it has the flaw of the diaphragm "only" F4 that in some situations is limiting. It wouldn't be a big problem if it weren't a new nearly €1,000 optics. The yield is excellent, as the sharpness at least up to 18, then drops a hair but nothing striking. The construction is really good, no game, great materials, WR, very well done. |
user63757
| sent on 29 Agosto 2021 Pros: Rings, mechanics, AF, stabilizer, sharpness, chromatic aberrations, filters, construction, WR gaskets. Cons: Front writing can be annoying when using Photo Filters against written reflected light. Opinion: Arrived yesterday made a series of tests. I must say the doubts about this perspective were many in the past I had more than one pair of the old 10-24 that I or criticized very hard variation qualitatively pairs and mechanics. The 10-24 WR Fuji designed for landscape photography where closing diaphragm I expect at f5.6 / f8.0 maximum yield even at the corners. I must say it does not disappoint at all or maybe or had luck to find a perfect couple. The tests that either made the sharpness really very impressive at focal length 10 mm but also at 24 mm where many criticize it I do not or found significant drop I would say perfect. On the old pairs of the 10-24 I had serious problems especially at focal length 24 mm the AF went crazy on the new seems perfect the AF tried manual bezel but perfect what I want sharp I find it excellent even on the infinity where with the old 10-24 was problematic ok they were all a can decentralized the pairs I had. Negative point I still find the writing in front on the optics can happen using backlight filters to find reflection of the writing I'm thinking of covering it with some black tape. Personally I make this observation the optics not at brightness f2.8 so not for astro photography indicated low brightness and I also say not for reportage photography better a fixed lens. Very personal or read on some forum Fuji I do not know what Fuji to fact same construction lenses as on the old 10-24 but it seems different more contrast and sharpness I also put myself with this consideration I do not know but perhaps a small improvement in lens treatments. For me one of the best lenses ever from Fuji super sharpness even at the angles at the level of the zoom pro f2.8. Note: at 10 mm slightly wider angle wider field than the old 10-24 Fuji but perhaps only the reason to Capture One not updated to the latest version so lack of lens profile. Not a cheap optics my couple anyway bought used but at least my couple really perfect and I'm over-happy. The 10-24 WR is better than the 8-16 for what concerns flare side light. On closer distances you can see that different behavior is better on long distances a landscape lens, or also found slight advantages on long distances compared to the zoom 16-55. Another observation the 10-24 WR reaches maximum quality at long distances with closed apertures or noticed according to the focal length even more external corners sometimes soft closing at f8.0 disappears completely. It can no longer be missing in my 10-24 WR backpack when I do landscape photography together with my new 70-300 + Fuji X-T4 really incredibly excellent and super stabilized when needed. |
 | sent on 23 Agosto 2021 Pros: Very versatile lens in the landscape photos for which it was born, which thanks to the 24 focal length avoids having to change the lens for some possible street shot, right weight, tropicalization even if not impeccable. Cons: Many of the defects of the previous series have remained, the shot must be calibrated very well especially if there are geometric subjects or people near the edges. The lens widens a lot on the final part, so the lens hood is very bulky. Opinion: A lens created for landscape photos, an excellent travel companion or excursion. With the focal length at 24 it allows you to also take some street photos even if for this there are much more suitable lenses, and also venture some portraits on the fly without changing the lens, something that would not be done with fixed wide angles. Obviously the results are not Pulitzer Prize. The lens unfortunately maintains many defects of the old, the distortion at the edges especially at 10 mm there is, in the landscape photo you do not notice much, but if there are people near the edges you have to calibrate the photo well, be careful not to tilt the camera too much up or down, let's say it is not a foolproof bomb, but it allows you to do many things with a single lens, which does not allow the 8-16, too specific ... In the street you can play a bit to make some nice effects, but always calibrating the distortion, which however is reduced to longer focal lengths. The maximum aperture is fixed at f4.0, the thing does a lot PRO, but I did not quite understand the advantage where it is ... having had an f2.8 at 10 mm would have allowed you to take pictures even to the stars. However, I repeat, for excursions it is excellent, the tropicalization works very well on the whole lens body, a bit of doubt leaves me on the area of contact with the camera body, I have an XT3 so tropicalized too, but I happened to find myself under an unexpected summer rain, which lasted a few minutes but it splashed a lot ... I dried it externally but after 1 hour there was condensation on the sensor, nothing inside the lenses, but on the sensor yes, disassembled the lens was damp the contact edge between body and lens, it had never happened to me with the 100-400. Excellent rings, very precise, fast autofocus, in general it is a good lens, although I did not fall in love with it lost... I also take various photos inside, but you have to be very careful what you do for distortion. is it the best lens for fuji? NO But it is a lens that I would call hybrid between a wide angle and a handyman. Its best it gives in the landscapes, but it allows you to start from home with a single lens, something that you would not do with a fixed 10 or 12, nor with an 8-16. Weight ok, similar to the 18-55, size a hair larger. It has that shape that widens at the end, so even the hood becomes quite bulky, and mounted on the contrary is horrendous. I to put it in the neoprene case I have to disassemble it, which I do not do with 18-55 ... result that always leaves them in the backpack apart when you just can not do without it ... |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
