Fujifilm XC 50-230mm f/4.5-6.7 OIS : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews

What do you think?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 259000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Andreas73

sent on 07 Ottobre 2021

Pros: lightness, compactness, stabilization, sharpness, cost, no visible distortion, "macro" capability, no visible vignetting

Cons: cheap materials, plastic bayonet, economical hood, length in extension

Opinion: Bought in 2013, I still use it with full satisfaction. In photographing concerts and events, it turned out to be an excellent purchase, thanks also to the stabilizer. At maximum extension it is perhaps a bit bulky, but closed it is very co-collared and light. Very useful for non-demanding "macro" photography. A zoom-tele that for the price it costs, is definitely to be recommended.

Enzo Rettori

sent on 05 Dicembre 2020

Pros: lightness and cost, definition at the lower focal points

Cons: more than 200 mm, quality that worsens beyond 150 mm

Opinion: Now I abandon Fuji and mirrorless them because I don't want to spend as much to buy the 55-200 (and maybe the 18-55). I have taken more blurry photos/moves in 6 years with this lens towards 200 mm and as well as with all the other targetss I have used in 50 years of REFLEX! Both on the stand and with a free hand! Maybe it's my specimen that was born badly, but I can't stand it anymore. If I happen to find a series II at a good price I will buy it to see what differences there are. Having said all the possible evil on the longer focals, I recognize that up to about 150 mm gives good color and definition results, but with a tendency to overexpose. I who love saturated colors, I bring the exposure correction to -2/3 or even to -1, while as a rule I keep it at -1/3

Alexc1903

sent on 23 Maggio 2019

Pros: Lightweight, value for money

Cons: Plasticous and delicate, dark, lack aperture ring

Opinion: I tried this lens and I reviewed it for RCE as a travel lens to combine with a 18/55 and a xt20. A light and qualitatively satisfactory kit in my opinion. A kit and a lens then thought for those who maybe part with the family and want to be covered a little ' on all focal. The focal excursion is "important", a 230 on app-C is equivalent to 345mm; Of course the lens is a bit ' dark but has behaved well in dark environments also because raising the ISO of xt20 (which holds them well), practically, the problem most often is solved. In my opinion, for the price to which it is, it is worth buying it if one is not a professional and does not seek the advertising magnification. Below I will post the link of my review on YouTube; While some photos made with the 50-230, you will find it in a special gallery on my profile https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fyb--vb4oug&t=480s

Ema88

sent on 16 Marzo 2016

Pros: Value, sharpness, lightweight

Cons: Hood, dark

Opinion: Purchased used, but in excellent condition 150 EUR and applies them all either positive or negative. I never liked the paintings, fattostà that of Canon I've never had one, here I wanted to try and I must say I was impressed. It was dark (and here is worth 150 € in negative) but as long as there is light does not weigh you and photos are full of detail (which is the value of € 150 in the positive views that churns out the photos!). Sore point the lens hood, it will ruin watching it and ..... seems to 230mm Captain Hook from extending the barrel and hood hat put there before.

Rame00

sent on 27 Febbraio 2016

Pros: Sharpness-Price-Stabilization-Lightness

Cons: Dark

Opinion: I took this zoom lens used but practically new to the incredible figure of 100 € .Consigliato who does not want svenarsi for 55-200 that is not 'comparable (for quality and price) .There and' suitable for night street because it's too dark and it manages to connect the Af.Su a tripod makes its final lavoro.Paraluce plasticoso.In straconsigliato

Bernacca

sent on 11 Aprile 2015

Pros: Optical quality, price, weight, color rendering, stabilizer

Cons: Hood that breaks easily, too plasticky

Opinion: A great lens in relation to the price. Paid about 170 euro used has an excellent color rendering and a good stabilizer. I really like how rende.rnCapace also a decent bokeh considered the diaphragm. In reality there is only valid in relation to the price, the series "Who has satisfied ..", but it's really a great goal. I imagine that the 55-200 is a lama..ma the price goes up a lot, even nell'usato.rnrnIn many situations I find it even more powerful of 18-55.rnrn

Alessandro '70

sent on 21 Dicembre 2014

Pros: Excursion - Weight - Stabilizer - quality / price ratio

Cons: Dark Dark Dark - Plastic Bayonet

Opinion: I have recently, but it's hard to go wrong a photo. Good autofocus, sharpness and contrast. Excellent hiking and stabilizer. plastic material for me in this case is considered a PRO if you mount the X-E1 for low weight. Value for money unbeatable I think. For those who do not know: it lacks the aperture ring that have the XF-series lenses. The opening command has been moved on the wheel.

Astramananielli

sent on 28 Febbraio 2014

Pros: Quality / price ratio, sharpness unthinkable for SLR lens in the same category, stabilized, light for the type of lens, excursion

Cons: Materials definitely not great, transparent plastic cap cover plug, not very bright (6.7)

Opinion: For this price you can not ask for more, really remarkable results obtained with this lens by large soddisfazioni.Se does not claim too much from the brightness of the diaphragm (6.7) this lens you will definitely have great satisfaction (assuming that the bright 55-200 + it costs almost twice as much) rnUn example: # http://www.juzaphoto.com/me.php?pg=12052&l=it fot776254