Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5 L II : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews

What do you think?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 259000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Pipetta

sent on 17 Agosto 2019

Pros: color rendering

Cons: Price

Opinion: I bought the TS. E.24 even after reading the opinions that appeared on Juza. But that's it. After having had it in my hands and used for a month of training the lens I wonder if those who have spilled opinions about Juza have really ever had the TS 24 in their hands. One of the merits of the lens that, for example, I read about Juza is its lightness; now a weight of well over 800 grams makes me think that reviewers are used to Hasselblad targets. But that's not what matters. A TS lens should have the functions of a TS lens: on this strangely all reviewers are silent, delved inpraise on color rendering, sharpness etc. It goes without saying that for a price such as the one required by Canon for the TS 24 must have good color yield and good sharpness (not so superior to a Sigma 24mmm that costs a quarter of what the Canon costs). I find, unfortunately at my expense, that the TS except for a couple of gadget-functions, rarely usable in serious photography, is almost perfectly surrogate with a good Photoshop smanettio, which is even able to offer better results. I also do not find the relevant reviewers to be marked by a series of 'uncomfortable' lens use that are only learned after you have read the attached manual, inconvenientness that all touch a fairly important point in the photograph that is the exhibition. I don't go on: now that I have it, I have to keep it. Very grateful to those who reviewers will want to give me his experience to teach me how to make the best use of the TS 24. In fact, although I have been dedicated to photography for years, you never stop learning.

Mevill

sent on 07 Maggio 2016

Pros: flawless construction, excellent sharpness in the center, good at the edges (shift 100%) from f8, absent distortion, chromatic aberration almost nothing

Cons: weight;

Opinion: Found new to physical store at a price that could not leave me stop watching it go away ... at the time I was torn between this and the leica superangulon 28R. Now that I have both of them can say that they are both at the highest levels, the super-Angulon is "firm" for reasons and millimeter focal shift to smaller shots, but retain more balanced proportions in the composition. The 24TS is big and heavy, has a much more sophisticated mechanism. More specialized. 28r with you is just fine even in "not very engaged" outputs, it is almost a handyman ... the 24TS is a real superpro. The final Wide Attachment, be persistent and give chase ... once you tried a TS you will never go back!

Ermannocazzola

sent on 23 Aprile 2016

Pros: goal aesthetically pleasing and comfortable in your hand; It is used with relative simplicity. Attractive price by virtue of what it offers.

Cons: Conversely known only two deficiencies; the absence of a lens correction profiles for various Adobe software (I have not found) and the lack of LOCK lever for the shift movement.

Opinion: Technical data; excellent sharpness throughout the frame (albeit not as the new 16-35 f / 4 or 24-70 f / 2.8 mk2) but sbalorditiva.rnResistenza to flare and really good for backlighting perspective wide.rnTecnicamente optics is perfect and shows no signs of debolezza.rnrnMa the best thing is to creativo.rnQualcuno wrote around that with the digital optical TSE have no reason to exist; I think a great nonsense ... probably those who have denigrated has never used or exploit bene.rnrnUn 24 TSE provides the ability to straighten the vertical but also the possibility of joining in a panoramic shots without distorting anything ... and to have a 14mm view, but with the prospect of a 24 ... essentially a SUPERWIDE that does not excessively stretch the edges ... and just call it !!! rnrnTrasformare a sprint from 18 mpx (my 1Dx) in a file to be 33 mpx at the highest quality and without problems of overlapping geometriche.rnrnRipeto lines; Some say that the digital does not serve well ... does not know them properly.

G.luca.74

sent on 18 Luglio 2014

Pros: Quality optics and offers possibilities

Cons: The price

Opinion: The own long, I used it a lot. It is a lens for stunning clarity and consistency. To use very special urban shots that allows me to tilt the effects of selective focus that I love them ... And while taking pictures is not how to achieve them in PP. Recommended for those who want a 24 sharpest and who knows who will have the opportunity / need to try something different. For photos of architecture is second only to the banks.

Bibols

sent on 12 Marzo 2014

Pros: A grandby with wide-open views.

Cons: Weight compared to the old version.

Opinion: In fact, I own its predecessor, mark I, from which this new lens distances itself in sharpness, less distortion and saturation of colors. I've only got to try it out, indoors and in quite extreme backlight situations and I have to say that the difference with the old one you see. Beyond the price is an optical also advisable for those who want a simple 24mm with a sharp and contrasted yield always in every situation, maybe it will not be f/1.4, but allows such movements with particular shots, that only a tilt and shift optic will give, combined with a unique fun in being able to frame much larger scenes by returning them in visions that go far beyond the usual and sometimes obvious framing of a fixed optics. Much easier and more immediate than the 17 TS-E, for those looking for pure fun I recommend the old version that is also used for less than 800 euros. Fun for Sunday photos, safe and reliable for professionals.

Voigtlander81

sent on 09 Dicembre 2013

Pros: Excellent optical quality at all apertures, excellent construction, ring mf solid and very accurate.

Cons: Nothing anything.

Opinion: Lens fabulous, a real L-series from all points of vista.rnAbbinata to a FF in my case to a final 5DIII is the wide angle, the lens does not remove the potential of mai.rnSfruttando tilt shift will have extraordinary creative potential, not only level photograph architettonica.rnUltima positive characteristic are the macro capability of this lens with a RR of about 0.34:1 FF and adding the extension tubes (both compatible) EF12 and EF25 respectively 0.85:1 1.43:1. rnPeso not excessive, very balanced on 5d3.rnStraconsigliata.

Giallo63

sent on 06 Giugno 2013

Pros: Optical quality from riferimentornVersatilità of use in the field, independent movements on two axes to tilt and decentramentornInsospettata possibility of using freehand with good results

Cons: price - overall dimensions

Opinion: From the point of view of the optical yield is the best 24 I've ever had (and I've had really many) probably even surpasses all 28mm currently on the market. It is simply one of those objectives for which the current density of the sensors are not a problem, but a limite.rnNegli architectural shots outclasses every expedient, in the first half of the superwide-shot cut in post-production, but it can also be used successfully as "normal" 24mm. The creative possibilities of the movement of tilt are another plus that does not confine this point to still life and photos in studio.rnPeso, size and price is one price that you are willing to pay before this kind of performance.

Fpl1966

sent on 27 Ottobre 2011

Pros: Quality 'unbeatable optical, I think the best 24mm on the market now. Even the best 24mm f1, 4 II today. Exemplary building, opportunity 'unlimited creative freedom, as well as the already' reviewed 17mm. For the effects of variation on the focal plane and 'even better than the 17mm due to the increased focus. Who says that Canon is not 'able to do wide-angle lenses should only try this gem.

Cons: First, the price is completely insane. Costs about 2000 euro (but I think it's worth it, and as' a perspective that does not depreciate). For those who can not focus manually or wants to force the AF to buy another angle. Obvious that the Tilt & Shift you can not 'put the AF. Not 'however I think a big lack, there' still the 'beep' to confirm focus and using the liveview can compose images flawlessly. It 'an optical "patience."

Opinion: I believe that the two T & S 00:17 are two excellent optics, perhaps 24 as IQ and 'a bit' better, but they are trifles. For those who do not want to compromise and want to have the image absolutely perfect including architecture, or want to try creative effects (focus and 'minimum) must at least try. Then the problem 'that do not want more' detached from the machine .....