| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
  | sent on 13 Marzo 2026 Pros: Small- Light - Efficient - Discreet - Pleasant to use - Image quality - Value for money. Cons: System decommissioned too soon. Opinion: A very good machine of a disused system. Forgotten too soon in favor of other brands that do more or less the same things. Nikon... I have always been looking for a camera that would free me from the weight of full frame (D850 and D800) and related lenses. I fell in love with this car at first sight. I always carry it with me, in the pocket of a jacket combined with 22mm2 and I don't need anything else. It churns out excellent files and 24 mpx, well workable in post, are more than enough to do anything and more. Bright colors and not exaggerated contrast, just as I like it. Defects? Of course it does, but do you know perfect cars? Defects are forgotten by what it manages to churn out and by the pleasantness of use. If you take a photo and after seeing it you smile, you have the right camera in your hand and it, for me, is it! I forgot: I just bought it, like new, with only 1000 shots and I'm looking for another one! Good photos to all! |
 | sent on 10 Giugno 2019 Pros: Value for money and transportability in the range of mirrorless APS-C. Cons: Build quality slightly lower than expected. In particular the doors, especially that of the battery compartment. Opinion: Purchased in May in view of an exotic journey. I chose the Canon M system especially for the compactness and transportability of APS-C: In a small shoulder bag you can accommodate the body and all the optics I have chosen as the equipment: 22, 11-22, 18-55 and 55-200. In addition to the replacement battery and charger. I do not express myself on the technical aspects, strengths and weaknesses are well known and adequately illustrated by the competent people. As a passionate user, discreetly informed, I can express some subjective judgments: 1) Build quality appropriate to the price range, albeit slightly lower than the previously owned Olympus and Nikon equipment. 2) Excellent ergonomics and/or feeling with native 3 lenses) ease/experience of optimum use, menu navigation and setting for everyone. 4) Aesthetics one of the strengths. 5) Excellent value for money, also because it is a model next to replacement (maybe..) and you can then buy it off the official channels at a really inviting price. 6) has a pair of optics suitable for travel reportage and excellent quality: 22 and 11-22. 7) It's fun to use. For the moment I am very satisfied with the purchase. |
 | sent on 06 Maggio 2019 Pros: Personally I find it very beautiful, image quality, ease of use, portability Cons: It's not a reflex Opinion: I'm not a professional photographer but a simple enthusiast and I own a 5d3, I wanted to buy an M6 to keep it together, something a little difficult with the big. My opinion is that if you find it on 400 euros is a very good buy. For those who come from a compact and you like the aesthetics buy it without thinking 2 times, is extremely compact and produces beautiful files for those who like me has a reflex there are considerations to do. The quality of the images is very high and removed the advantages of full-frame has nothing to envy to my 5d. The focus is quite fast but it is here that a reflex wins, with the 5d frames and shots, the M6 takes a few moments that in certain cases make a difference, the ignition is slower, is not ready immediately. But off the speed problems I would recommend it with eyes closed to anyone. Very convenient the WiFi synchronisation with the phone, ideal on the road and very comfortable the various regulating rings. The videos are always well in focus even with fast moving subjects. I hope I could have been of help to someone. |
  | sent on 09 Giugno 2018 Pros: Second flexible body Cons: Ergonomics Opinion: I replaced, as a second body, the first G12 with M3 then with M6---The dimensions are a double-edged blade-on the one hand they allow a great transportability (traveling often in motion or hanging on the shoulder straps or backpack as a second body), on the other the many ring nuts and p Ulsanti are welcome but too crammed into a confined space and it is almost impossible to manage them without displaying them directly-on the quality of the files, I also find that the difference compared to the M3 is negligible but the speed of AF has improved a lot in Particular in keeping a subject in fast motion... however still insufficient-+ complete and rational the supply of nuts and buttons but their fluidity is at the level of a compact camera (the buttons too "flush" and the nuts definitely not flowing, Except the central one that is too much and is activated often accidentally)-improved compared to the M3 the point (area) of MAF now available in 2 dimensions, on the M3 was too large-indispensable the possibility of being used (the whole series M) is With native optics from the human cost, that light optics of the EF-EF/S series that unbalance not a little-2 things incredibly castrating pedophilesgenerally this machine, (in relation to its price range), an optional BG that would make it use with important optics very + easy and fully articulated LCD in place of the current that allows the movement on an axis, but does not allow to find a position free from reflections with strong sunlight-in short: equipment and yield of good level and compatibility with all types of optics, from Vintage, Al fixed bright, at 400mm x against size too minute x manage all this potential and ergonomics consequently painful-all the features offered are the best a photographer could want, from the manual commands to the commands "touch" On the LCD, but everything was cured better and on a body less "anorexic"----update: On the field I find it disappointing the accuracy of Af in critical conditions-shooting for example at close range often the MAF is not accurate, probably does not evaluate Adequately the contrasts and the area in focus does not correspond to the center of the bounded area (which is only indicative of course) from the dedicated rectangle-the situation does not change by varying the size of the MAF area, working in One shot-this had led me to To think that some of my optics suffered from problems of MAF, but in reality the problem is the M6-essentially, just like the M3, on many occasions the MAF is decided on the edges of the indicated area being fooled perhaps by a small area with greater contrast.... A lot of close-up shots thrown away, pity (the old Canon G12, still taking into account the greater PDC of the Small + sensor, was definitely + slow, but + precise) |
 | sent on 24 Aprile 2018 Pros: Nice car, functional. Good files and easily workable. Cons: I see great improvements over the M3. Surely a speed AF major, but as files and ergonomics are at the same level. Opinion: Tried it for a few days having owned a M3, I actually find that apart from an improved AF speed there are big news. Definitely much better built the M3, it gave me a feeling of strength and design features. This miracle of dual pixels I honestly don't I perceived, files products have virtually the same quality ... and sometimes the digital noise on the m6 looks worse (with the same settings). Honestly the micro 4/3 is several spans over, with Olympus I also stabilized sensor and also produces files in JPGs are really another story. If you have a M3 and are thinking of moving to m6 be calm and keep close the M3 with no regrets. |
 | sent on 21 Gennaio 2018 Pros: Weight, ease of shooting, good command position and excellent files, excellent adapter for lenses already in my possession Cons: For now, not even the price because everything is worth it. Opinion: I took it because I have some Canon material. I was undecided whether to orient myself with olympus or whether to stay with Canon and at the end having found a more than good opportunity I took her home. I must say that springs from God and is also very reactive. She is pretty little and there is very good even in the jacket pocket with the 15-45 in kit, which although basic objective from some very detailed files, then if you want more just put the canon lenses that I tried with the adapter original canon keeping all the automatisms to perfection.rnHot the 80d but sometimes it can be cumbersome, here you have the same good quality of file but with a bit of weight and clutter in less.rnIo the advice is to those who want a good car and with reduced size and also to those who need a second body. rnPerhaps I would recommend it to those who approach photography. In the car is more than good then slowly you learn.rnSi knows that it is a mirrorless and then you feel less in the hand of the SLR however the first impressiona is that it is well robust.rnA who is doubtful I say to take it quietly. (unless you want the video in 4k that is not there but they are good the same) rnPer now I do not know what faults to give, at the limit when and if I find it will update the review. But this time I have to say I'm really excited about the purchase I made |
  | sent on 14 Settembre 2017 Pros: Small and complete, I can use my EF lenses. Cons: Let's hope Canon expands the M series lens line with a wide angle and a bright tele (at least F2), which optics are currently missing. Opinion: had been in use by a friend for his temporary transfer abroad for two months. Returned on its return and immediately ordered with the 22mm F2 and optical adapter EF/EF-S. With the 22nd it's really in a pocket (big) or just in the mountains i insert it in a plastic bag in bubbles and away in the backpack. The quality of the files is in line with the APS-C DSLRs of the same generation, so not that of 1DXII or 5D4, but still very good. Well also the AF. I don't do video so I can't write anything about it. No problem to adapt to the different ergonomics (and well) from that of my 5D4 and the various menus are familiar to those who use Canon. Priceless to be able to count on the EF lenses when needed with the adapter (I took the original). Obviously does not replace the 5D4 for action photos (Auto/moto in my case), but having it in the bag was and will be an extra security and added value if I want to exploit the crop factor APS-C, remaining its primary use in my case that of * always ready in my pocket *. Really very happy. Edit: With a simple adaptor I can use FD lenses including real gems like the 55 F 1.2 SSC Aspherical. The focus is manual but can use focus peaking, Magnifier and hyperfocal. Great fun Additional! |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
