Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews

What do you think?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 259000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Reg.77

sent on 25 Marzo 2023

Pros: Sharp

Cons: Not very bright, essential hood but to be paid separately

Opinion: What can I say, there is little to say, sharp never misses a photo, excellent color rendering. It costs to be the M series but it's worth them all. The only two defects I found are the photos in dark environments but if you carry it around with the 22mm it solves the situation, for example when visiting cities of art. The second defect is indispensable to have its hood that Canon should give it, in this case, together when buying it.

Stefano Marangon

sent on 03 Maggio 2022

Pros: Small, stabilized, no distortion

Cons: Not very bright but you know it when you buy it

Opinion: Really sharp lens, well built and very light. A 16 35 equivalent in just over 200 grams that combined with my m50 become a super portable and very effective combo. The only compromise is the brightness but if you need that there are the fixed sigma or the ef m 22 f2.0. Together with the ef m 32 they perfectly match the philosophy of the M system. Absolutely to have if you have a canon ef m

Dadoleo

sent on 22 Marzo 2021

Pros: Small, light, crisp, cheap.

Cons: Vignetting.

Opinion: Surprising goal. I use it on the M5, instead of the Sigma 10-20. Excellent sharpness, good stabilizer, in a compact and light body. It also has a focus distance low enough to allow close-ups set. As with all ef-m optics, you don't have to faint to buy it and it pays off with superior quality. Vignette a bit even from closed, but it resolves into posts. Of course it is limited in night photos for low brightness, but this is taken for granted.

Gabri97

sent on 01 Febbraio 2020

Pros: Focus, price, compactness, sharpness, stabilization

Cons: Nobody

Opinion: For what it costs it also does too much, using it mainly for landscapes is sharp all over the frame, a f/4 is still acceptable and usable for night photos. Then it is very compact and well built, it is even smaller than the 18-55 base. The only flaws are the lack of distance scale, which can be seen as compact, and the lack of automatic/manual fire selection, which is missing on all native lenses for eos M. Combined with the M50 is a gem

Lookaloopy

sent on 22 Novembre 2018

Pros: Small and light, stabilized, excellent construction, distortion absent

Cons: The brightness, but there's even worse

Opinion: It's a little gem, sharp as a blade all over the frame, the definition is good already at full aperture, effective stabilizer, what I wonder is the simplicity with which you can get shots without distortion with an equivalent focal of 17mm on FF, really excellent.

Ozzy89

sent on 23 Ottobre 2017

Pros: size, yield, stabilized, cost any filters.

Cons: There is the scale in meters of the focusing distance,

Opinion: Very happy with this lens. I love it for the weight and size really reduced, for the sharpness at all focal lengths and apertures and for the materials with which it is built. In my opinion for money worth buying it. I use it in the mountains and all those trips where I have little space in your suitcase. The fact of having to unlock is cumbersome if you have to make only one quick but personally I have never had any major problems.

Mauro Gamberini

sent on 12 Ottobre 2017

Pros: Size, rendering, cost, covered focal lengths.

Cons: If I consider the use I do, no one.

Opinion: Taken to have a wide-angle lens for my M6. It does not greatly increase the size of the machine that remains (relatively) pocketed unlike the M6 ??EF 16-35 L F4 binomial. The yield is good and the focal 11 in combination with the articulated screen allows you to make different pictures without performing acrobatics. The optic allows you to get close enough to the subjects, not for macro, but always to get different images. Great companion of Canon M.

Mau1948

sent on 21 Agosto 2017

Pros: Sharpness, stability, solidity, compactness

Cons: Lack of manual / automatic selection and lack of focus ring

Opinion: It seems to me a lens that gives excellent results of sharpness, small size and weight to take it at any occasion. The possibility of blocking the lens in closed position, judged by many, a defect in my opinion is a good thing, in fact normally I keep it open and I can shoot without any special problems and only in case or "risk" situations or when I put it in block, thus getting smaller size and I feel more resistance to occasional shocks.

Memfoto

sent on 13 Giugno 2015

Pros: Sharpness, stabilization, robustness, compactness.

Cons: It must always be unlocked, so it is annoying

Opinion: A compact lens, clear, stable and above all light for EOS M.Ottima color definition, vignetting and distortion contenute.Che say more than that he must always be unlocked for use ?! We get used to that but also to bring home beautiful photos, remaining light and using a wide-angle lens stabilized and so small. A vote of at least 9!

Smorf

sent on 02 Giugno 2014

Pros: sharp images, good stabilization.

Cons: cumbersome and impractical to unlock it and use it.

Opinion: It really looks like the 10-22. Good quality of the shots, very sharp, excellent performance at all focal lengths. Ideal for EOS M or for travel. In hand looks solid because of the metal construction. Generally use the 22/f2 because of less space but you have to have to have a zoom lens or a longer focal open aperture and a more 'closed, I highly recommend it instead of 18-55. chromatic aberrations contained and still easily erasable with DPP. Deserves a 9 in relation to the M series and its use with this system.

Bass3d

sent on 14 Ottobre 2013

Pros: Sharp across the frame, excellent contrast, silent autofocus and effective stabilization. Resistance to flare. Metal body well done.

Cons: Need to unlock it from the closed position to the ring fotografare.rnManca of distances.

Opinion: Lens design very modern, effective at all focal lengths, even at full aperture. I find that the images obtained are better than standard EF lenses as the Sigma 10-20 or the Canon 10-22.rnL 'irritating aspect according to me, is the necessity of having to unlock the front through the actuation of a button and while rotating the zoom ring, quite slippery due to the metal construction, utilizzare.rnStabilizzazione before it can be very effective, even for video.rnLa focus at infinity is almost impossible at night, since it lacks an acknowledgment of distances, making photos of cielo.rnOttimo difficult for photography of landscapes and architecture. The deformations are fully acceptable to a wide angle so spinto.rnVignettatura and chromatic aberration are corrected very efficiently and automatically by the machine.