Canon 800D : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews

What do you think?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 259000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

DaveM_95

sent on 05 Maggio 2022

Pros: Good sensor, 24 Mpixels, 45 AF points, mobile touch screen, connectivity

Cons: Well nobody, for the kind of camera

Opinion: I owned it for more than a year, coming from many years of 500D. I bought it because my budget allowed me to upgrade to amateurs. I must say that I found myself very well: it has an excellent image rendering and its megapixels make the difference when cropping. The AF is not absolutely evil, it is obvious that it must be compared to its market segment, certainly not with a 7D II. If you know what you are buying, it is a great machine, never had anything to object to. Paired with the 24mm STM pancake or 35mm IS USM gave me a lot of satisfaction. I managed to shoot up to 6400 ISO without encountering annoying noise, eliminated in PP... beyond I have never pushed.

user163569

sent on 07 Aprile 2019

Pros: Weight, Dimensions

Cons: Maybe the viewfinder

Opinion: Purchased to search for the peace of the senses, a halfway between the portability of an M4/3 and a quality from FF, I find myself perfectly satisfied. The machine has very interesting dimensions and weights, especially when combined with "pancake" lenses such as the 24 or 40 2.8, or the 50 1.8. I like The performance of the sensor, the keys are well arranged and I find the quick keys to recall the most used functions, without anything to envy to higher-end models.

Manu Vinnie

sent on 06 Febbraio 2019

Pros: Excellent guided function instructions, good handling, great photos.

Cons: Nothing at the moment

Opinion: I bought it for a few days and it seems a great reflex for those who start and not only. It also takes great photos with the 18-55 standard lens and also has many megapixels in its favor as well as 24. It is not absolutely heavy it is practical and handy to take anywhere! It has a good grip that allows good stability during shooting! Equipped with APS-C sensor that for hobby and travel is more than satisfactory. In short, a great product to keep in my opinion even if you want to switch to better sensor, could always come in handy. Very good value for money

P.Zeno

sent on 07 Gennaio 2019

Pros: Handy, very intuitive guide menu, great photos

Cons: For now nothing

Opinion: I love photography, I always had digital cameras, but my wish was always to buy a reflex, after laps on the Internet, tips with friends and according to my needs and budget I chose this, not just an entry level but some higher step. I have a few days and I am very satisfied with the purchase, in fact I evaluated the Nikon D5600, but in the end I chose this. I highly recommend it to those who are fledgling, thanks also to the guide in the menu.

Pqlrgl

sent on 04 Settembre 2018

Pros: Handling, battery, excellent entry-level

Cons: Maybe kept enough ISO?

Opinion: Bought at the launch for Curiosity as the first official SLR to have at home recommended by Rickydellipaoli (I think a good YouTuber), I was literally falling in love with photography! I had then to compare it with the 6d II of a friend of mine who bought months after my 800d and I have to say that, clearly, we are two different worlds.. But the 45 cross points of focus at par never disappoint! Purchased the Sigma 17-70 and scheduled the Sigma 18-35, I'm fond of the type APS-C and then having the good fortune to have a friend and colleague of photographic picnic with FF, I think that my future choice will still fall on an APS-C reflex (maybe the Chat 7d III?) While I'll watch how you improve the ML. We hope in good for the future!

Pvps3

sent on 04 Gennaio 2018

Pros: resolution, good dynamic range, usable files up to 3200 ISO

Cons: until now nothing in particular considering price and apsc factor

Opinion: I state the fact that my review is based on the fact that it is a machine that costs 600 euros and then turned to an audience of amateurs. That said, I am a matrimonialist photographer and I have been able to use it in royal weddings. I was impressed, really. Obviously it has its own limits with regard to holding the ISO being apsc, but otherwise it is really good. The main body is a 5d mark 3 and I often use a 1dx, but this little apsc is very good for your own space. Obviously arrived at 3200 ISO files have an important grain size and the focus system goes a moment in crisis in areas dark areas, but for everything else, as mentioned, is really good. I will try to implement some image of the last marriage, so as to make clear the potential of this machine not bad

user128541

sent on 22 Giugno 2017

Pros: How to Own Ferrari after having driven a ten-year old rut!

Cons: Battery wrapped in insufficient, indispensable a second, as well as the remote snap, not easily available and for now obeyed, connecting my smartphone to wifi

Opinion: Anything I can find I've bought based on reviews from other sites, and on a background experience where high precision is required when it's the optics that does the job anymore! So transforming theory into practice, I paired with the 800D, a Sigma Art. F.1.4 / 85 mm. For future imitations of portraits and macros and landscapes.

Andrea De Regis

sent on 14 Giugno 2017

Pros: Tactile screen; functions.

Cons: Some modest uncertainty of focus in difficult light conditions.

Opinion: I come from the 350D who has faithfully served me for twelve years. I was favorably impressed by the tactile rear screen and, of course, the quality of the photos. A bit more, though scarcely used by me, is the ability to make movies. I do not understand - frankly - the reason why in the 350D there was the possibility to resume b / n with different filter effects, which I did not find on the 800D. It is true that photos should be treated in b / n in post production (and filming in raw), but the chance to see the photo as it is taken is still important. Especially for me, I find post production a sort of falsification of photography that must be valid from the moment of replay.rn