| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
  | sent on 18 Febbraio 2023 Pros: Swivel screen, easy to use Cons: For my use, no one in particular. Opinion: I used it for over ten years before switching to 6D Mark II, but despite having upgraded it is still not the time to retire it. Excellent machine to which I am very fond, easy to use, with which I experimented a lot even in conditions that are anything but easy as sports photos in indoor arenas. At Iso a little higher it suffers from noise, but if it weren't for the fact that I'm trying to make a qualitative leap in my way of taking photographs, I would have kept it as the main body for a long time to come. |
  | sent on 15 Febbraio 2019 Pros: Good autofocus, adjustable screen and touch, battery life, light files, excellent resistance to cold Cons: 18 MP (but they can also be a pro), Opinion: I had this camera body for about a year and I have to say that I found it very well, certainly not a super professional flagship, but with its 18 MP has been able to return me the beautiful shots, has a good resistance to ISO, certainly nothing striking but we say that He's doing it........ the swivel touch screen is really great and sensible, in my opinion very comfortable, the 18 MP (then become 24 in the next model) are a little few, however, its price, especially now that due to the output of 2 new bodies 2000d and 4000d is Down a lot. As for the autofocus, with its 9 points of MAF (which are not many, but they are fine to do a bit ' of everything), I thought it was very reliable and accurate. The construction is plasticose, does not give the idea of having a professional body in the hands, but overall I was quite comfortable, excellent even the resistance to cold, I click many times below freezing and I have to say that does not lose a shot |
 | sent on 29 Dicembre 2016 Pros: Swiveling touch-screen display, good autofocus. Cons: For the current price range, no. Opinion: Just today poked around the Internet, and if I had to choose what to get started TODAY with Canon to photograph in the house, I would choose her damaging small 1300D. With a hundred euro for euro or so we will take home more an entry level with 9-point AF and pentamirror, but with fabulous and a good quality display (in addition to having all the AF points cross unlike the sisters). rnHo this camera for almost a year and after many uses I can review it properly. And 'an entry level plastic, Single-ring, not tropical conditions, without exceeding the display, with pentamirror and limited burst, but for amateur use is fine. I paired with bright enough goals to remedy the non-exceptional performance over 800 Iso, like the 24mm 2.8 Stm (pancake, shots even at 1/20 with due caution while not a stabilized lens), the 50mm 1.8 Stm (arrived today, after almost a year of vintage mopeds, with good autofocus motor for its membership zone) and the exceptional value for 55-250 STM. As I mentioned I usato the car with vintage goals, even if it is not the strong point of the SLR (for what there is with mirrorless EVF) but with a little 'out of hand and are comfortable with the live view you can do good cose.rnCon new STM gives the best of himself. I mounted on other goals and the impression is that it is able to work better with its Stm.rnrnIn summary, it is logical that we should not expect amazing things, but if you have no great pretensions and has a good knowledge of the machine and its objectives (what I would say essential) you can safely enjoy the own SLR without having to chase the latest model in the list, I too would like the 80D but if you really think about how to use the machine, I see not then have so needed (indeed a mirrorless for vintage, these points) .rnrnAd today, the value has to be evaluated very carefully, in my opinion. Good evening to all! |
 | sent on 21 Dicembre 2016 Pros: Full SLR, image quality, excellent touch swivel screen, excellent optical canon, Cons: body that does not broadcast quality using it, poor shadows recovery, manually stop the iso only in full and not fractions Opinion: It 'was my first and only SLR camera, I own from August 2014. Can I talk to passionate and non professional. I 'definitely a complete camera, I would say that you can do everything with excellent quality from photos to video even with good stm 18-55 in kit. The swivel screen is useful in live view mainly because it is an excellent touch screen and allows you to focus by touching the desired point on the image. The photo quality is excellent, as in all recent ASPC, seeing pictures of my comrades in the 2 courses I have attended, the difference will make the lenses that you will put in front of its sensor. 18 mpx are exaggerated for 99.9% of the uses that do, some prints 30x45 and 10x15 and 13x19 thousands that would be equally good with a 6mpx, the advantage is that if they are not accurate in the frame to crop can also very. Certainly the shadows recovery of various sensors sony is much better but not always needed, the ISO seal is similar. the costruzionand it is made of polycarbonate, precise, but not by the sensation of an object of value (like many of its competitors fascia). Battery for me sufficient. My opinion for a possible first aquisto: if you want to take pictures and video is perfect, if you have not just photos and optical equipment are looking for a 40d or 50d canon or nikon d7000 and d300 or d90 used, cost less and give in your hand feel. If you are not impallinati x mirrorless SLR are in my opinion very good and usable in situations where the reflex to leave home and lose a lot of shots, and photography is this: seize the moment! |
 | sent on 23 Novembre 2016 Pros: swivel touch display - ease of use - Video - 5 fps - battery life Cons: Personally only the noise at high ISO (up to 1600 in some conditions are still acceptable) and the lack of the second display, but with the advantage of touch you delete immediately Opinion: 26 # 39; opening and whenever possible of its time. Of course you should not compare this camera to a high-end FF, obvious that there is no history, but for Sunday outings is really fabulous. |
  | sent on 30 Settembre 2016 Pros: APS-C, rotatable display, video, good range and good seal up to ISO 800 Cons: noticeable noise after 800 ISO, audio room so so, missing rings Opinion: I state that in my opinion it's a good APS-C machine, churning out good files with appreciable general resolution (18 megapixel are more than good), has a good video industry for those who want to challenge themselves, intuitive menu and excellent display if you think that there are bodies far more expensive and PRO still fixed display. Acesssoriabile, plasticky but not lightweight, and therefore able to compensate for the weight of targets large enough (maybe we tell the limit). We say that the real limit of this canon is the ISO seal which deteriorates the images as soon as the light is less and you are forced to alzarne sensitivity, holds blow (in post production) up to max 800 but besides not recover almost nothing. This does not mean that we can work around the problem in part with lights in the studio and outside, and whereas, however, in the hours daily the problem is irrelevant. Having been my first SLR I can not fault it, he gave me the desire to photograph and get back to learn techniques and expressive researches photo / video that has long no longer considered.rnA I think the first real entry level canon for quality, now enhanced with 750. Compared unbeatable quality / price, either by buying it new finding is used at a very paltry. If you are looking for a way to enter the world of photography and video cameras you will have fun for sure. |
 | sent on 11 Aprile 2016 Pros: Light, swivel display, video, stereo audio, Cons: Plastic, ISO noise in some cases annoying. Opinion: I have this 700d after 6 years of 1000d, the plastics do not give a good feeling, the machine behaves very well, some problem at high ISO but nothing worrying, certainly not at the level of higher-end machines, however I would not call it an entry level, I see her more like a good amateur. Excellent machine for beginners and experts looking for a second body. With battery grip is perfect and achieves a range of more than 900 shots |
 | sent on 20 Dicembre 2015 Pros: Lightweight, rotatable display, intuitive thanks to the touch, you learn faster operation, produces good file until 800iso Cons: Do not give the impression of being solid, plasticky scratches easily Opinion: My first (and so far only) SLR, bought two years ago. given my knowledge in photography initial zero, I learned using this machine, initially relying on the touch screen then as I improved my skills, I relied more and more to the buttons, dials, etc. .. RNLA file quality is excellent 100 and 200 ISO would say good 400 and still acceptable to 800. Above I used only in limited situations such as the starry heavens, struggling in post produzione.rnPunto strong is definitely the rotatable display, excellent already in itself to take with manual lenses in live vew, he has this plus nell'orientabiità. It is useful in macro photography, or when it is necessary to place the machine in unconventional ways (for example on the ground to make the most of all cm wide) or why not also for selfie, timer etc ... rnSull'utilizzo gust not I speak, however, for the photos that I have done so far proved sufficiente.rnSe tomorrow wateHister a Full Frame I think anyway I'll keep this as a reflex second body ideal for when you need the mm more capable of turning out good at low ISO file. |
 | sent on 19 Agosto 2014 Pros: Light weight, excellent touch screen sensitivity is like that as resolution, high-speed focusing, especially with the objectives of type STM (STM I use the 18-135 very often). The ability to track the subject when working in Live View is very convenient, not only in the video. Great exposure meter. Excellent performance even at high ISO numbers (3200) RNLA management of external flashes wirelessly is very comfortable and I often use it with one or two Canon speedlite Cons: The building knows a bit 'too much plastic. Sometimes you miss the double ring and the diplay on the cover, as on the EOS 60D; for what it costs you can not have tutto.rnIl viewfinder is not very bright. Opinion: The purchase of a Canon EOS series of three digits is generally a safe purchase. I read several reviews of this machine on the Internet, in particular on dpreview.com and imaging-resource.com, before changing the way the "old" with the new EOS 550D EOS 700D. rnIl sensor "hybrid" with the central part of a double set of pixels (in advance of that of the EOS 70D) is very convenient and allows working in Live View to track the subject and keep it in fuoco.rnIl touch screen is crystal clear and sensible (is of capacitive type as that of the smartphone), over which orientabile.rnLa image quality (I shutter always in RAW) is really good, even at ISO 3200. The methods of use, both creative (P, Tv, M) that the automatic ones, making the machine very pleasant and fun to use even for a photographer esperto.rnLa management of wireless external flash is absolutely complete and is very comfortable. So, to me that I also have a Canon EOS 60D is an excellent second body, or when I go to the mountains, and aXCELLENT SLR that allows me to take pictures of everything without taking too peso.rnSono really pleased to have bought it and recommend it unreservedly to all canonists who want a good SLR at a price much less than 1000 Euro (lens included) |
 | sent on 12 Aprile 2014 Pros: touch, swiveling display, lightweight, intuitive Cons: Plastics very poor Opinion: I have had several entry level is that nikon canon, but I would classify this camera in the range of semi-pro. File generates excellent, clean, is very intuitive, and the touch is really great. The only thing I would say is that the build quality leaves a bit to be desired considering the competition Canon could use better materials |
 | sent on 23 Marzo 2014 Pros: Swiveling display, touch screen, excellent jpg files, managing high iso. Cons: Plastics Opinion: I replaced my 550D. I find a lot of differences, especially the swiveling display and 'useful and effective, then, to be a APSC, if you turn up the iso is possible to obtain manageable files. Jpg The result machinable. The only drawback plastics which, although of good quality, are always the same, all the way from 350D. I think it's a good second body, in addition to a FF or a APSH, as in my case. Used with a 40mm becomes a compact class, even if the body is not of the smaller and lighter. |
 | sent on 29 Gennaio 2014 Pros: Easy to handle, excellent grip, very little noise even at high ISO, very fast, touch display, rotating display, the possibility of making videos, shooting touch screen and ability to focus touchscreen, presets very good, structurally very compact design in my opinion very pro! Cons: for now nothing in particular ... the plastic on the back-screen seems a bit too thin and fragile, same thing for the plastic slot SD card, sometimes the proximity sensor off the monitor when the face approaches sbarella ... and sometimes stays off, but it happens rarely .. Opinion: I switched from the 450D to 700D and it seems to travel on rails completely different ... pictures come out very clean and I do not feel the need for more almost post-production, raw save 4-5 shots very quickly, it is very fast overall, I must say that in my opinion is the best canon semi professional I have ever tried before d 'Now ... looks just PERFECT for those who want to upgrade then get the full frame, but I think with a 700D you can even do without a full frame, in experienced hands is definitely a hottie! 10 vote! |
|
| sent on 10 Dicembre 2013 Pros: The word SEMIPROFESSIONAL makes the concept very well Cons: Given the price I do not see Opinion: Fantastic performance and ease of use in the menus. Eye on price speculation in expert hands ... Surely if he reaches incredible levels combined with optical level I'm sure would make a great deal in every circumstance perhaps the use of internal flash needs to be helped conmpensando exposure when used indoors small size |
 | sent on 08 Novembre 2013 Pros: -Grip, comfortable grip! Rn-display touch: shoot, Focusing, zooming cover photos taken with your fingers, on a rotatable screen .. rn-fast, both in the fire automatic save in 4-5 photo-rawrn also excellent at high isorn Cons: -Uhm .. Opinion: After a couple of years with the 450D, I had the need to move on to something "new". Finding the range of EUR 899 to 700d with 18-135 stm, I also took the 8-16 sigma. What can I say, another world .. is a wonderful machine, weight and ergonomics right, autofocus with 9 cross type points that I was surprised by the speed, even in the video (sometimes serve ..) EXCELLENT image quality even at high ISO, and even without having the display higher-end SLR like the most advanced touch screen makes up for with no problems, even helping to get a better idea of ??the frame .. rnDecisamente satisfied, personal vote: 9.00. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
