| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
  | sent on 25 Aprile 2019 Pros: Ergonomics, touch, JPEG vouchers, latest made in Japan series Xxxd Cons: AF in Live view very slow, high ISO not exceptional Opinion: Used for about 50000 shots, of various kinds, from the landscape to the sportsman, to the ceremonies. It is sempee behaved with efficacy and reliability. Touch screen Comfortable but never used, AF in Live View for me bad (used with several good lenses, but always terrible). For the hit and run reportages, with the distribution of images "on the fly" is exceptional, if correctly set the excellent JPEG that does not need pp. Last of the series Xxxd produced in Japan... The quality of the materials, despite little more than entry level, is considerably better than the sister 700d. Exceptional ergonomics, fair weight, discrete battery life. Only notes on the WB automatic that especially with artificial lights easily misses, and the yield at high ISO, a little disappointing, but in the average of the APS-C of the time. However reliable and quality machine. |
  | sent on 11 Agosto 2014 Pros: Image quality, good yield up to ISO 1600, ergonomic body, touch screen, 5fps burst, 9 focus points of which 9 cross, (something still a entry level) screen swivel. Cons: Materials, steps away from a stop in ISO ISO manuals, dial modes much and unnecessarily "overcrowded", IQ high sensitivity, low resistance to adverse weather conditions (humidity, snow, rain), time buffer, lack of white balance manual. Opinion: I purchased this camera following the breakup of the electronic components of my old 600D, a veteran of four months spent photographing continuously. At first I was very torn between the home buy a better camera, the 70D type (only serious alternative to this series, however, already quite advanced) or to riaquisto the 600D. The fateful moment came before departing for Kenya, when my supplier has assured me that the right choice for me was this machine. It is now three months since the operation and I can certainly say that it was the right choice. Let's start with the pros in detail: rn (1) Image Quality. Although the statistics show that the 600D is slightly more developed under this factor the 650D is certainly not back showing off a 18.5-megapixel sensor that gives sharp and well contrasted with the objectives of the medium-low livello.rn (2) high yield ISO. It holds up well to ISO 400, at ISO 800 there is a slight grain but dry, fine and easily correctable, especially with the gooduce. As for the values ??as high as ISO 1600 and 3200 can be easily used for photos destined to end up on the web or for small prints, the image quality here is good despite a slight loss of detail. I personally have never gone beyond the 3200.rn (3) ergonomic body. Having tried the 600D, the 100D, and 5D Mark II say that for me this is very good on the factor ergonomico.Cade perfectly in hand, the buttons are all in the right place and there is a wide freedom of control on the various buttons For me it would be useful also a display screen settings like the one on the cover mount cameras more advanced (60-70D), but it would be asking too much for this reflex.rn (4) Display. About the touch screen I can only speak well, is a technology that has been recently applied to the most sophisticated SLR canon and, despite being just became part of the cameras, it seems to me an excellent addition, with almost nothing that can not is already foreffect. The fact that then this is also tilting of 180 degrees is especially useful when trying to get different perspectives. So a big plus point that distinguishes this reflex from the typical entry level as the 1100-1200D.rn (5) Other specifications. This camera also features a burst of 5 fps, many for a APS-C medium-low. Obviously, however, it does not enter the Olympus of the blasts as the reduced size, since it is up to 7DII with 10 frames per second, but it's still a good result if you want to get a good shot naturalistic. Among other things, we also find the classic viewfinder has 9 AF points, but 9 of them cross (3.4 in most of the 600D 5.6) that provides for accurate focus despite the reduced availability of punti.rnPassando cons instead: rn (1) Materials. Although the 650D looks good aesthetically and is very ergonomic materials I find them a little by entry level, category to which non appartiene.rn (2) Mode Dial. I find thisdial mode of another point against the 650D. There are an infinite number of settings and different settings which I think most of the owners of this camera will use it and not just once. So I can understand 3:00 to 4:00 automatic modes but ten are way too many. Furthermore, some are just ridiculous and give the feeling of having to do with a camera looking entry level.rn4) sensor. Despite being a fan of this sensor now evolved performance and I think it is still possible to improve the high sensitivity without getting already at ISO 800 noise a little annoying, especially in light conditions difficili.rnrnIn conclusion I think this camera is aimed at an audience of advanced amateurs or at least to those looking for a serious approach to photography, to others who want a camera body just to take some pictures or sporadic fotoricordo recommend more the 1100D or 1200D, with the same sensor but more affordable. Instead those seeking the famous "quantum leap" from a 500-600D or a 100DI highly recommend you to evaluate the alternative of a 70D, now one of the best in the world aps-c canon.rnCosa I wanted more from this camera? First, a better performance at high sensitivity and the ability to select the ISO steps 1/3 stop, a dial to select with all mod creative and a few automatic, some point of focus in more, to get at least 11 and a screen for displaying settings on calotta.rnMolto consigliata.rnVoto: 9.2 / 10 |
 | sent on 11 Agosto 2014 Pros: Image quality, touch screen, weight, ergonomics, ease of use, ISO, video, almost to the level of a semi- Cons: A little 'plasticky, battery Opinion: This was my first SLR. I have to say, after almost one year and a half - and after having tried others in this period - which for its price range and for the public to which it is addressed is really a very good machine. Personally I find it very well built (except just for the quality of the materials that are made of plastic - good plastic -) and I always find with your fingers to the keys I need. No doubt this camera has helped me to grow photographically speaking, and if the top is easy to use for someone who has never used a DSLR, going back in time and using only the manual modes (Tv, Av, M) does not makes me want to upgrade to something more powerful. Even the ISO quality is pretty good for a 'aps-c, arriving safely at ISO 800 to 1600 and also the quality is not bad. Maybe the battery life is not great, but with another reserve is easily accomplishes the task. Like others, stra recommend this camera to enter the world of photography. |
 | sent on 03 Marzo 2014 Pros: immaginane quality, burst, price, autofocus and a swivel touch screen, weight, battery life, excellent video Cons: building a little plasticky Opinion: for me it is a great SLR: great quality and colors of the files even with the simplest type 18-55 goals, the quality increases spropositatamete with good optics, easy to handle and light with a good autofocus and manageable noise even at high ISO type 3200, as well as lost as much of the "image quality Add more money to excellent levels, the touch screnn is really useful even if all" beginning may seem like a toy and makes good the "idea of ??how he managed the shot, very workable file in post production, all buttons are well positioned and easy access to the touch screen as well as screnn that once made the "habit is very fast in changing impostazioni.rnrnMacchina amazing even in conditions in which I have taken: in the middle of a mereggiata with saline abundant in" air, as in mountain climbing to -15 ° in the rain and snow, desert, etc. Well never a problem and never clean the sensor until now with 13 thousand shots still perfect as well as the battery, SLR stra recommended!!! |
 | sent on 17 Gennaio 2014 Pros: Light weight, battery life, shutter speed and focus, flatscreen exceptional touch Cons: Noise at high ISO (like all the aps-c) Opinion: Camera fits perfectly in my opinion, given the prezzo.Premetto I am not an expert, but the photos I take are especially moving subjects, and I have to say that the results I can get my good camera also meet molto.Un travelers, given the weight ridotto.rnChiaramente components is a bit 'plasticky, but at this price I really think we can not expect more |
 | sent on 26 Ottobre 2013 Pros: Af fast, maneuverable, monitor, battery Cons: None for the moment Opinion: I'm almost a year I own this camera body, with which I am very well, the speed of focus is good, it is very easy to handle, is very resistant to Iso (certainly not as a FF), I spettavo worse and instead I was stupid, good burst and good also the duration of batteria.rnE 'my first camera body and for the moment the only, and I can only give good ratings, I articulated screen is very convenient and also in touch some occasions it is faster than traditional buttons, for me I use little or nothing, the quality of materials is good and has a nice grip, perhaps with a Bg would be even better but it should be at the expense of portability, runs excellent video but honestly I have not taken for that reason. RNLA advice for those embarking on the first time the world of photography, is an "entry level" even though I rate this a shade above this category. |
 | sent on 17 Agosto 2013 Pros: Quality, easy handling, robustness Cons: They've been discontinued, replaced by the 700d which is equal. Opinion: I am very well, it's my first SLR and, before buying it, I've studied fine. Does well in the photo, it is very fast, has a great extension of ISO, and has many useful ways, such as that of manual shooting night, which I use often when I happen to find myself around at night without a tripod. The button layout is very comfortable, the screen is great because the wheel well and is totally removable. Also it is able to turn the excellent video, even if not much use for this purpose. In general, I would highly recommend to anyone who wants to enter the world of photography without buying a low quality product. The 650D is considered a prosumer, so it's already a step ahead than other models considered purely "entry level". |
 | sent on 03 Maggio 2013 Pros: AF very effective and fast, light weight, many available features, battery life, full HD video in high quality Cons: building a little reading, but for me it is not a defect Opinion: Purchased camera about a month ago and I must say that I was pleasantly surprised, especially for the great picture quality baked by the sensor 18 Mpx. Really fast and precise autofocus, especially with the 40 f / 2,8 STM, but also with the 50 f / 1.4, and with the 17-55 f / 2,8 IS USM. The 9 cross-type points with sensitivity in the middle of f / 2.8 you are really effective for shooting moving and stationary. The videos are of excellent quality in Full HD. |
user20639
 | sent on 19 Marzo 2013 Pros: Intuitive, easy, accurate and fast AF, better sensor sisters, image quality, video performance in its class, ergonomics fast. The touch screen, exceptionally useful and practical. Cons: The battery is not enough for all day, max 350-400 shots. Dust enters if it is windy, I've already had to clean the sensor. The button that stops the exposure is pressed accidentally. Opinion: Describe in a few sentences is detract from the machine, however, exceeds expectations for its image quality, has so much more of the sisters with the same sensor. Seems robust, has so far been quite tossed, but has no visible streaks. I bought it for the journey, all day in a backpack or by hand, when I find something I pull out and describe the shooting. The path is made from 25/35 of the time even 40 km in a day, I wanted a light car and the 40/2, 8 it is. I've tried alternatives with smaller, but then what you bring home is not up and if I take the 5D: the weight feels molto.rnChe say, the advice from travelers who love not to miss anything. |
 | sent on 05 Gennaio 2013 Pros: AF effective. Shutter Speed ??remarkable. Excellent color rendering. Flexibility of the display. Body and handle solid without being heavy. Good performance of the battery. Cons: Not sure what video with AF Opinion: Switching from a 400D.Tutto another mondo.La color rendering and shutter speed are eccezionali.Abbinate a good lens is easy to achieve great photos sportive.Non will fall in the range of semi-professional but I think at the level of final performance just we're missing. Live View comfortable but slow, so useful, but subject to appropriate. Touch screen (at the time) I do not think is necessary and using it tends to leave a lot of fingerprints on the display, but gusti.Ho matter of some doubt on the video function with AF. I could not use stm objectives (specific) but better to go with conventional lenses in manual. The AF is noisy (and remained registered in the second half) and slow. Working in the manual made the movie is rather exceptional. |
 | sent on 09 Ottobre 2012 Pros: lightweight body and compact swivel and touch screen functions, fast and simple in the settings menu Cons: having it for only 1 week I have not found Opinion: I come from a bridge (a fantastic Panasonic FZ45 that I still jealously in the tray), and just made the first shots seemed to be on another planet! Fast, I forgot expectations between shots and the other of glorious while lumix. The grip I find, to my hands, quite perfect. The display is nice and bright readable, thanks to the choice of different combinations of color background / characters that allow you to find one that suits your needs (I chose the white background blacks with characters that seemed more readable). The buttons are arranged so as to find the various functions quickly. Comodo ISO button at the top for the shortcut of sensitivity, intelligent programmability function for the SET button, and useful the "My Menu" to set the 6 functions that are expected to be used most frequently. I have found useful functionality "click manual night" and "Backlight Control. HDR", but the feature that I really entusiamato is the touch screen! I find it very well done, the switch settings for quick, convenient for display and functionality of the "touch / Sharpen / shoot" is amazing. For now I have the standard lens 18-55 but I intend to buy as soon as possible (hopefully for Christmas) as the 40mm STM can not wait to make full use of the hybrid sensor, also because, in addition to photos are also fond of video that the FZ45 is so egregious even if "only" 720p. We'll see if the 650D manages to make me not regret! |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
