| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
  | sent on 15 Aprile 2023 Pros: Good focus with kit lens, nice files, sharpness, few settings that are needed, you can see well in the viewfinder Cons: None I remember at the time Opinion: It was my first SLR and my first camera of my own. I used it a lot and it never disappointed me despite not knowing raw processing well (I was still very young). I came from a canon eos100 film that mounted a 28-80 and I found the same fast and accurate autofocus as canon on the 350d using the center point. Machine that I think is still superior to the next 1000d that was really entrylevel. |
 | sent on 28 Gennaio 2021 Pros: Lightness Cons: It's cancer Opinion: Ok, of course, it's a review written in 2021, so in an era far from the golden age of this device. It is also written by a person accustomed to a Mark II 5D EOS, so it is well understood how switching to this device was a nice leap. After this brief premise, it is very bad from almost every point of view. Objectively it's a little cancretto. But small, very small, almost as much as the price at which it can be found. And when you start to relate to the price... Bought for 50€ on RCE Photos with warranty! Then everything makes sense, and if it joins the fact that the batteries are at derisory cost and its lightness that makes it ideal to be transported anywhere at any time: simply fantastic. If you add a pancake lens such as the ef 40mm or the ef-s 24mm it becomes more contained than a bridge, and the 8 megapixels, made the most of by any modern optics (however cheap) are still too excessive for those who use it only as a basis for social production. Obviously 5 minutes after golden hour or in any closed environment becomes unusable even with an f/2.8 or an f/1.8. At iso 400 you can already see the noise increase, and at iso 800 the photos are simply unwatchable. But as a secondary machine body, or in case you were looking for a reflex to carry with you every day, given the price, it is ideal. The screen is small, but it does its common work; on the other hand, the presence of a textual LCD indicating the active settings allows a quick management of the device (saving a lot of battery) as on the larger machine bodies (the reason why I chose this one instead of a 450d by the way). Despite the smallness and my big hands, it is convenient to hold and the controls are intuitive. A cancretto, but beautiful and fun. |
 | sent on 24 Gennaio 2020 Pros: IMAGE QUALITY Cons: MATERIAL A PLASTICOSO with a tendency to spoil Opinion: Bought new newly released used a lot even in climatic conditions in which it would have been better to use a TROPICALIZED or semi-tropical reflex such as the Canon EOS 40D and Canon EOS 50D that I purchased later. The quality of the files is excellent, the autofocus is accurate even for action photos (although it is to be preferred Canon EOS 40D or 50D) After about 10 years of use the external machine body has ruined itself at the level of plastics but not at the level of functionality and I had sold it to buy an EOS 500D canon (of which I noticed that by comparison it had less sharpness in the photos in fact replaced again after less than a year for a Canon EOS 100D that I still have). Last year, i regretted selling the Eos 350D and finding one in a photography shop and virtually unused (it had about 1000 shots so perfect) and I bought it back for a short time. I'm still reusing it with a lot of satisfaction. |
  | sent on 12 Aprile 2019 Pros: My first digital SLR Cons: It has failed after 10 years of use very intesivo Opinion: What can I say better than the Canon 350D except that I would have kept it as a life camera if after having martyred in all the manière possible and imaginable: Dai-30 ° of Finland to + 70 ° of the bonnet of the car under the sun of my native Sicily, the rain, the Wind and sand of Brittany, shocks, etc... Climbing on Mount Etna... I was not "successful" to oxidize the motherboard (due to prolonged use in the rain) and make it irreparable for lack of spare parts. It Is a camera that goes to the essential no frills or technical specifications, is used to take pictures like a Nikon F or a Leica M... Compact and light with the zoom 18-55 IS that I strongly recommend (instead of the 18-55 IS not the Kit that sucks) you can always wear ' on ' almost like a compact (I had a bag ready in leather) and the battery is forgotten so hard for a long time. The image quality is excellent, more than enough for any use, with 8mpx I did enlargements 50x70cm. Of an astonishing quality in relation to what I used to realize in analogue (and I was accustomed to a Leica kit) and also compared to the more modern "inflated" cameras of pixels do not disfigure at all. Of Course you have to shoot in Raw to get the best and preferably develop them with DxO that completely transforms the files of 350D, giving it a precision, a fidelity of colors and an absence of unheard of noise for analogue ratio, and that are reclaimed over time To each new version of DxO, with the versions that have the RAW denoise (starting from DxO Optics Pro 9) to at 1600iso has the noise is so moderate and the details so well preserved that one wonders why Canon did not include the ISO 3200as in the 20D which has practically the same s Ensor. The only "nei" of this camera are: 1) The dynamics of the sensor that does not really huge tends to irremediably burn the highlights, I set it with a compensation of the exposure of-1/3 diaffram to remedy, but nevertheless you have to expose with care Even in raw, better to choose the central weighted measure and rely on the "conditioned reflexes" inherited from the analogue. 2) The viewfinder is really unworthy of a reflex, small, dark... Oh My God, you get used to it and it doesn't restrict photographic practice, but you're always dreaming of a better viewfinder (which I found with the 6D that replaced it). 3) The autofocus is extremely precise, I have never had back/front focus problems, but the AF points are too centered, better to use it than the old doing but focusing with the central collimator and then squaring up later. The AF continuous penalty to follow the subjects on the move I ventured to photograph a game of friendly football with good results but it is not made for the sports photo. For Travel and reportage the AF behaves well but for the instant and the Street I often prefer to use it in the ancient manual focusing on the hyperfocal that I marked with a notch on a piece of adhesive on the barrel of the lens to be able to easily Return the notch of the focus ring. So If you have one do not leave it in a drawer, use it can still give big soddifsazioni, but if you want to separate contact me I'll be happy to get rid of... As the saying goes, "The first love is never forgotten." |
 | sent on 24 Dicembre 2016 Pros: It consumes sensor state of the art for the time. Digic processor 2. Compactness. battery life. Extra monochrome dispaly. Cons: Poor ergonomics, vibration-return mirror, viewfinder, and the small blind, the small screen. Opinion: My first digital SLR, the time was an epiphany. The still I keep as a souvenir. It represents the historical moment when the dSLR can provide guess quality became accessible to the general pubblico.rnPriva of frills and nonsense but not what you need realmente.rnLa I would also recommend to a beginner wise and all those who approach to digital wisely (or coming from analogue). Watch out for those who have big hands: better to aim to 30d that does not cost that much more expensive. |
 | sent on 22 Novembre 2016 Pros: General features, monochrome display on the cover (abandoned since the 400d) Cons: nobody, considered age and location Opinion: He solved the many problems of the 300D. He gave the same - excellent - the coeval 30D sensor. It was the last - in the category - with monochrome display on the cover, then abandoned by the 400D. Purchased today, it is for beginners who are early connoisseurs. Why s'avvederanno than it's worth, on the field, a design wisdom. |
 | sent on 21 Maggio 2015 Pros: Files light, a forklift, durable. Cons: Used so the only decent center AF point, the noise over 800iso, limited dynamic range, color rendering by bad 800iso on, monitor baby. Missing function AutoISO. The viewfinder seems the peephole of a door than a fullframe, but I see that the 700d my partner has not changed much. Opinion: It was my car for 10 years, I bought new in 2005 and still use. I passed a lot of the 200,000 shots and is mirror shutter still work fine. RNLA I used in the snow, the sun, the sea, the rain, and despite not being Tropicalised did not give me problems. I am extremely happy with our purchase and I will always keep with me, even when I pass in fullframe. RNLA recommend anyone wishing to approach the Photography to learn and grow. |
 | sent on 31 Dicembre 2014 Pros: bargain prices (2014), handy, important commands at hand, excellent to start Cons: much noise with high ISO Opinion: I bought recently, second hand, this camera at a bargain price (with tripod, memory cards, purse, second battery has cost less than my previous camera, a bridge samsung). I must say that I found right away well, the important controls are handy and easy to use, the second day I had understood what and how I had to crush. The only limitations, for a beginner like me, due to the car are very noisy images with high ISO, but I already knew that before you buy it and try to fix in post. For the rest of the car is perfect, I can not wait to change that lens with the 18-55 kit I feel too limited for what I would do. |
 | sent on 05 Ottobre 2013 Pros: Pixel big enough for astrophotography Cons: Lack live view Opinion: I used the 350D as the first car to do astrophotography, then I switched to the 550D but with inferior results because the pixels are more but are more 'small'!! Now I would like to return to using the 350D but I have no more ' the EOS DIGITAL Solution Disk, someone can 'help me find him?? (Would be fine also a copy of the CD) Thanks, Bergama. |
 | sent on 19 Luglio 2013 Pros: Image quality, quality / price ratio, easy to use Cons: age, screen too small, AF is not perfect, limited burst Opinion: My first and only SLR since I photograph ... despite his seven years ago I still have fun and I do not regret most modern machines and offering performance ... the photos have excellent clarity and quality and noise at high ISO acceptable. The construction is very good seen the mistreatment suffered yet perfect ... easy to use, small and light does not bother take it dietro.rnUna flaw is the screen too small that it allows a perfect observation of the shots taken. |
 | sent on 26 Gennaio 2013 Pros: ridiculous cost, easy to use, value for money I would say almost unbeatable, lightweight Cons: old technology now, AF not great, few megapixels Opinion: I have the 350d for 2 years, I bought it used and it was my first SLR ever! rnpoco to say is fantastic to start allows you to understand the basics of photography and experience the most ... sure it's old but the value for money I think it's still unbeatable (after almost 8 years since) rnc'è think that once things were done much better .... rnpenso that shots below are a clear testimony of the potential |
 | sent on 27 Dicembre 2012 Pros: current price, battery life, overall quality of files returned Cons: display, keyboard layout Opinion: was my first and so far only reflex.pagata really a misery for the years that you still defend it pretty well: even at ISO 1600 files are still quite buoni.la penalizes the lack of live view manual focus, in return, the battery lasts tantissimo.lo screen is far too small and too low a resolution, provabilmente this is the biggest flaw. |
 | sent on 16 Novembre 2012 Pros: It is located at ridiculous prices, image quality should not be underestimated, monochrome display, light weight, simple and immediate, CF Cards Cons: piece of plastic, high ISO files, display size, burst shots, hot pixels on long exposures Opinion: What can I say, it was my first car, I took my first steps with her in this hobby.rnSenza pretentious and conscious of my very small economic resources, I aimed at something old but decent and what to say, it was a pleasant surprise, than the selling price which is now very low, has much to offer, 8 megapixels are more than enough and offer images dignitosissime, of course the car expresses all her sisters as the best of optics well made, unfortunately I never had the opportunity to take advantage of similar quality then we can say that with the mean optical machine will not give certain performance sublimi.rnRaffica too slow for any sports photo, above 800 ISO noise can be seen how, and long exposure night shot are formed in large quantities of hot pixels on the whole is very good and then the monochrome display, which is absent in all other entry-level outputs after which condemn especially for this absence imperdonabile.rnNonostante is a piece of plastic and the grip is not at affidabile, confirm its strength, fell 2 times, even in a disastrous way, the worst damage was on the cover but no damage funzionamentornConsigliata respect to those who want to get started without spending a fortune, perhaps combining it all immediately with some optical face the difference! |
 | sent on 11 Febbraio 2012 Pros: It 'a reflex and (now) costs very little Cons: Viewfinder dark, tiny LCD screen, missing LiveView and it is difficult to focus properly in the manual. Opinion: It 's my first and only SLR. Bought for peanuts really giving me a lot of satisfaction because it has made me closer to the world of photography more seriously than it has done so far with the usual compattine. For the moment I feel cramped on the LCD of microscopic dimensions, which together with dark viewfinder and lack of LiveView (as written in the "against"), makes it difficult to MAF manual, but deep down, when photographed on film there ' was no display on which to see the result of the shots, so we can not complain too much. All in all, for what you can pay now, is an Old world purchase for those who want to approach photography with a capital F. |
 | sent on 26 Novembre 2011 Pros: small and light, money, good image quality Cons: small and dark viewfinder, LCD screen small, lacks live view, self-timer only 10sec, AF slow, plasticky, some software bugs Opinion: It 's my first and so far only reflex and despite the flaws accompanied me on many adventures and although it is plasticky, in five years it never failed. I like her the compactness and lightness, but his being small has its cons: the screen is too small and you pay too much if you want to preview and also the histogram. The AF is decent but not great. A 1600 ISO shots are a bit 'noisy. The viewfinder is perhaps the part of the machine that the less I like it. Out of production years ago is now only second-hand, but for beginners, considering the price, I think it is a good investment. |
 | sent on 05 Ottobre 2011 Pros: Small, light, good image quality, price (now), dual screens. Cons: AF performance, slow burst, screen baby. Opinion: The 350D was my first digital and I must say I took a lot with her. As said above the image quality is all right and with its 8Mpx are you doing enough (but not too much). The AF is not the best but if Cavicchia, the exposure as well. It 'plasticky, everyone knows that, but he never succumbed to beatings and various scantonate. One thing that always fascinated me haq and that no other series XXXD does not have is the dual screen, very useful to me! The price is crazy, if you need to let us fight a little something (someone uses it only for the infrared). |
 | sent on 25 Settembre 2011 Pros: Easy to use, good image quality Cons: Viewfinder dim, very small screen, limited ISO, AF slow Opinion: It 'was my first SLR after a compact. I bought it in 2005 and I sold it only in 2010, then about 5 years of use with this camera in which I fell in love more and more to photography. Excellent value / price, although perhaps now is a bit 'limited compared to reflex the same level that we are now on the market. The 8Mpx are more than enough to make good prints of medium size. Lightweight and compact for transport, perhaps a little 'small for those with large hands or want to use important objectives. Miss the live view (but I've never felt the tightness ...), but above the monitor is very small: it is difficult to assess the MAF one click just did. Viewfinder dark and very small. AF is a bit 'slow, but for landscape shots is moltobene. |
 | sent on 24 Settembre 2011 Pros: Size, price / performance ratio (especially if bought used), image quality Cons: Lack live view, small screen, slow burst, slow AF Opinion: I have about two years the 350D, which is also my first SLR. I bought it used, to see if the world of digital photography, which fascinated me seen from the outside, was really intriguing. I must say I was immediately surprised by the performance of the small 350D. Past the initial enthusiasm for the leap from a compact to a DSLR, I started to explore the many functions. Outwardly is a totally plastic body (not weather sealed), good robustness and ergonomics (for hands not too large). Unfortunately has a very small LCD monitor and from which it is difficult to understand if we got a picture really sharp. The connection to the PC via USB cable and the camera is automatically recognized by Windows. The picture quality is very good (even today) and there is the possibility to take in raw + jpeg, while shots at high ISO (above 800) return a little 'noise. The AF is not the fastest and the burst stops at 3fps, making it not suitable for extreme sports photography. It should be also noted that the lack of live view, but it helps to maintain performance of the battery. At present is an excellent starting point for those (like me a couple of years ago) wants to enter the world of digital SLR photography, without selling a kidney. The capabilities of the 350D I still meet in full and if you change your body (mainly for AF and live view), would pass directly to a XXD series. |
  | sent on 13 Luglio 2011 Pros: Image quality, quality / price ratio, ease of use Cons: Gust very limited, AF modest, obviously lacking all the latest news of the reflex Opinion: The 350D was my first Canon, chosen for its excellent quality / price ratio. The image quality was considered good at the time, and even today it can be considered fully usable: good resolution, acceptable noise within the ISO 1600, good dynamic range. Currently (2011) can be found used at bargain prices, and certainly offers a good alternative to the compact: it is a good way to enter the world of DSLR if your budget is very limited. Despite the slow AF, the lack of live view and a feature set is not huge, I took some of my best photos with this camera! Like all cameras xxxD series, it is very small and light, the construction is quite plasticky but has resisted several ill-treatment. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
