JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies Customize Refuse Cookies
RCE Foto






Login Logout Join JuzaPhoto!

Canon 300D : Specifications and Opinions



Reviews

What do you think?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 259000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on 26 Luglio 2019

Pros: sturdy, lightweight, does its job well, simple to use from the first use.

Cons: small screen but for the time it was fine , Slow in storing files

Opinion: the 300d is great machine not to be underestimated, recommended for those like me want to take pictures with a reflex. I bought 1 month ago at 20 euros I am more than satisfied because despite the 6 mpx are more than enough, I can have churnout beautiful photos both day and night with a simple optics the 18-55 of the kit . Today I would recommend those who want to start taking real photos leaving rested smartphones.

avatarjunior
sent on 15 Luglio 2019

Pros: Good, many commands, easy to use

Cons: Obsolete

Opinion: Bought a few years ago second-hand to perserate. I bought it that was in precarious condition, stopped for a long time, the black plastics were loose. Clean with isopropyl alcohol and glue removal products is coming perfect. The photographic performance is good but not in step with the times. Autofocus isn't always accurate. The iso range is poor. The live view is missing, you have to get by with the optical viewfinder and the speed of writing the cf card is biblical. Full-spectrum, it is possible without dismantling the machine body, takes beautiful infrared photos. Updates: I installed the firmware of the 10D that brings the iso sensitivity to 3200 and allows you to save the raw-jpeg

avatarjunior
sent on 06 Gennaio 2018

Pros: Cost very content, does what you need without frills, and what he does (the photos) does it well.

Cons: Small display (but for the time it was normal). The plastic coating of the handle over time becomes soft and sticky, I had to peel off and cover with a bit of leatherette as it had become really unpleasant to the touch.

Opinion: I come from a manual yashica SLR, which by the advent of digital has become an ornament. This camera has allowed me to switch to digital with a modest expense, continuing to use the optics in my possession through a 17 euro adapter ring, obviously in manual (but I did so much earlier). What can I say, the sensor returns sharp images and contrast, does not offer high ISO (but with the film I've never used more than 400 ISO) and despite today we have made believe that 6 megapixel are a joke, making 2 counts there realizes that for an amateur use, 6 megapixels are too many since a common full hd monitor has a resolution slightly greater than 2 megapixels, and if you want to go to the press, with 6 megapixels you can easily print a 20x30 photo without interpolation , and a 30x45 with a light interpolation that is not even noticed on the final print, looking at it closely. Me with the normal 50mmm yashica I made a couple of portraits to my daughter printed one 30x45 and one even 40x60, with a bit of pp, bothbi framed and hung in the study. Then if you want a picture, cut a crop a couple of centimeters and enlarge it 50 times, then the subject changes and here the megapixel would never be enough. In addition, the car is beautiful, it handles well and despite being plastic (it was the first SLR to get under a thousand euros) gives a good feeling of solidity. The manual focus is not 'the best for those who like me it comes from a pentaprism with broken image, but the adapter ring has the chip that makes the focus indicator work in the viewfinder and also the beep, so you can use manual focusing quite easily. I use it as a priority of the diaphragm, imposed by the lens ring, and I leave the time setting to the camera, which I can obviously control by opening the aperture I choose to use, and for what I have to do I stop and move forward. Considering that today is used around 80 euros, I think it is excellent for people like me comes from an SLR analogica, and I already have the fundamentals of photography, has the possibility to continue to shoot, obviously always in manual, without having to throw the optics out to the nettles. The only discordant note is the quality of the plastic used for the handle, which is obviously treated with a substance that makes it soft, but which over time makes it sticky and sticky, so that it becomes very unpleasant to the touch. I solved by removing the plastic handle and covering it with fake stolen leather ... sorry ... borrowed from my mother-in-law who is a seamstress, but from what I've read around this problem also affects other SLRs from the cost much greater.The supplied software is available at most for win xp, but much more than 'connect the machine to the PC, just take out the memory card and through a very common USB card reader and' possible with a few euro transfer images to the pc. In short, I am very happy with the purchase, and even if it were to break because it already has a few years on its shoulders, I would cry con an eye seeing how much it cost from new when it came out (€ 950) and how much I have paid it now I used (€ 85).

avatarjunior
sent on 04 Maggio 2016

Pros: Economic, reliable, robust, lightweight, easy to manage, without my prior fronzoli.La digitale.File SLR clean day.

Cons: Dated, and few isufficenti af points, iso sufficient only in the daytime to night must faticare.Corpo of economica.Monitor invoice machine ridiculous LCD.

Opinion: Economic not back in 2003, but today definitely si.E was my first digital SLR to which I owe a lot in terms of learning from the analog pass digitale.Non I can absolutely say bad despite all intrisechi limits of the product concerned given the past years and a dinosaur ... But i like Dinosaurs ... Worst aspect and certainly lCD monitor that at the time all of these were fitted ridicole.Per sizes who want to start spending anything maybe they pull back and far better than any mobile phone or tablet the which does not teach you to take pictures in manual species as does the 300D.Purtroppo I had the bad idea to give it away instead I was fond of.

avatarjunior
sent on 14 Agosto 2015

Pros: Good car for the period in which it is output. Obviously you can not expect blood from a turnip! It also has an aesthetic that just do not like! However considering the era of marketing, the use that I did and that I continue to do, the more than 50 thousand shots that ground, the batteries (original) that still maintain a decent charge, make me say it has a good price / performance. The file format that generates, printed with Epson printers to high-end A4 is perfect. I find no appreciable difference to the naked eye with a 5D MKIII I use to work ... rnprova made using, of course, the same goal! Rn

Cons: Aesthetically disgusting! At least for the coachwork in silver! And I have one! RnLenta to store files in the shot continuo.rnSchermo small though, at least in my opinion, was a reflex electronic still very attached to the structure and functionality of the analog machines. I would venture to say that he had a hybrid design.

Opinion: A great car to do gym and excellent foto.rnSe is used at a decent price (a 50tina of € or so) is really a good entry-level and then is very strong: I do not know how many times I fall and continues still work! rnPessimo the goal that was given in the kit 18-55.rnQuello died! And before he died, at least a couple of years before had begun to give rogne.rnUn common defect of the series: it broke a link in flat interior (cost € 12 Bay) but mangy to change despite the endless tutorials on Youtube ! rnih However top marks! rnLe do an 8 more than deserved!

avatarjunior
sent on 30 Dicembre 2013

Pros: For normal use makes beautiful photographs in RAW can be reworked with Photoshop Camera Raw

Cons: Screen and burst

Opinion: I loved the analog, I had the VitoB Voigtlander, Minolta SRT 101B and the X700 with lots of accessories to play with then developing and printing B / W With the Canon 300D I have always done regular photos, family, friends, holidays, essays of my daughter's dance etc.. But with friends and family has always made me look good. Now that I'm past the 6d I realize that was a nice mule for a mental reset to switch to digital.

avatarsupporter
sent on 14 Giugno 2013

Pros: Light weight and maneuverability

Cons: Obsolescence

Opinion: It was my first digital SLR camera. The bought in 2005 and used the rivendetti in June 2006. I took my first photos with a minimum of knowledge of the facts (at the same time attending a photography course organized by a circle of well-known photographers of Turin). For its time churning out pictures with good sharpness. The rivendetti to buy the 30d as for my needs was necessary for a camera with a better command configuration (in fact, the 300d was devoid of multi-ring present in the canon SLR upper class). Today I would say that is outdated in everything and think it makes sense to use it only for special purposes (infrared) or in special situations (where it is not ensured the safety of the camera like the carnival in Ivrea).

avatarjunior
sent on 28 Settembre 2011

Pros: Good image quality, file Raw light

Cons: Very small screen and live view, burst very slow, technologically antiquated model

Opinion: I bought the Eos 300D used about two years ago. The camera body is made entirely of plastic, but it has always done well in any situation. The 'AF has only 7 points and is not very powerful, however, will do well in scenes not too dynamic (Landscapes, ceremonies etc. ..), certainly in fact this machine is not designed for motion pictures since the burst is very slow and can do only 4 photos in RAW consecutive. The built-in screen is very small and therefore does not allow to better view the photos. Apart from these defects the machine produces quality images and easy to work especially coupled with good optics, up to 400ISO noise is virtually absent while above must be reduced in post production, but you can still get good photos up to 1600 iso, even if they have a bit of grit. The files are also contained on the size of about 6Mb, this makes easier their conservation and does not require very large memory cards and performing. So ultimately I think it's a good machine for those who approach for the first time to photography Reflex fact with a modest investment you can achieve good results. For me still continue to shoot with this machine, and then move in the future to a XXD series.








 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me