| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
  | sent on 25 Giugno 2025 Pros: Good jpegs. Average video at normal AF. Cons: Raw too noisy after Asa 400-800.Small but plasticky machine. Slow to collimate stars with 55mm. Opinion: Small and plasticky, but jepg are sharp. The Raw after the iso 400 come to pixels (in the red and dark contrasts)Only the. Luna is saved in 18-55mm. The Stars. They are sharp up to 200 iso. But what an emotion eclipse July 27, 2018 Villasanta.In the macro it is sharp up to 25cm. But beautiful lunar eclipse 2017 even if partial. Crisp videos but difficult to master. |
 | sent on 12 Maggio 2024 Pros: Weight, RAW file quality, high ISO sealing, wifi Cons: Only 9 focus points, with more performing optics it is very very unbalanced (like all entry level), small and very dark viewfinder, at night in maf you struggle a lot Opinion: Excellent camera to have fun and to take anywhere, fairly well built and also very handy. Although it is an entry it holds very well the high ISO (maybe my specimen is particularly lucky), I shot at 800/1600 and the files are easily usable, at 3200 yes I can save well without effort, beyond that I have never gone, but just a few days ago I made a startrail at ISO 3200 and I must say that the noise is extremely contained, I would never, ever have imagined it!! Very convenient wifi that allows me to manage the camera even from the Ipad. The autofocus unfortunately often even in good light conditions is often unsuccessful and sometimes going into maf, especially at night it takes many test shots to find the correct focus, in all this the viewfinder is really small and very dark, below the average of the competition. For the rest I have to say that for playing, or as a travel body it is not bad at all. The files are really workable and of good quality, plus 18mp are not few at all, on the contrary!! You can't expect too much from an entry level, but this one I have to say really surprised me in a positive way. |
 | sent on 28 Giugno 2023 Pros: Price, lightness, cost of compatible accessories, simplicity of the menus, arrangement of the keys, megapixels (in my opinion) more than enough, body that has withstood more than 4 falls from 1 meter in height and has never hinted at a drop in performance. Cons: Cheap materials (for what it costs is still fine), ISO that after 400 begin to give existential crises, AF with 9 points that from f / 8 onwards becomes almost unusable, to the point that it is wrong 4 times out of 5. Opinion: My first SLR, I've been using it for 7 years, and I don't know where to start. Purchased as soon as it came out, I didn't even know what a "manual shooting" was, it gave me the easiest way to learn how to photograph, simple and intuitive menus, few parameters to configure, few focus points, little everything. But this is both a pro and a con. It is a con for those who use € 2000 of camera body and are punctilious and sensationalist experts who appreciate nothing and spit on a camera body that is not made for them. It is a pro because in a single body it is able to teach you everything you need to start, if you attack an L-series lens it becomes a scalpel, then if you give it to him from f / 4 down he is not afraid of anyone. He gave me breathtaking shots, his megapixels are more than enough, do not listen to the exaggerated photographers who narrate their adventures while as a camera body they use the James Webb, who shoot the 50 megapixels on APS-C as the absolute truth ... they simply never compared its quality to the price, or they never brought the camera body to cover itself with mud in the middle of a via ferrata on the Gran Sasso or in natural parks in the rain or concerts in the middle of pouring rain. From the mother house the body is not tropicalized, but I went there in pouring rain to do services at the concerts a lot of times, it never gave hint of drops in performance. She has never missed a file, even if she only has an SD card slot she has always been reliable. Its weight is certainly one of the most important factors, it does not tire... If you attack the 50 "plastic fantastic" weighs nothing and makes a mess. The very small viewfinder I do not consider it neither a pro nor a con, it is a con because at times it does not even make you understand if the subject is in focus or not in situations of poor visibility (fog) or low light. It is a pro (in my opinion) in teaching moving subjects in the straight, you do not lose the reference of the frame, of course then if you shoot with one eye closed and one open you lose it anyway, but they are details. My biggest cons I give it to non-reactive AF points and ISO usable only before 400, for the rest is the camera body of the beginner, the neophyte, the inserted, but it is still a perfect camera body, but ONLY FOR THEM |
 | sent on 30 Dicembre 2020 Pros: Good sensor, quality/price, ease of use, battery life Cons: High ISO seal (normal for an APS-C), slightly dark viewfinder Opinion: This is the first REFLEX I bought and after 3 years of use I think I can make a reliable review of it. The machine is perfect to start with, it is very simple and intuitive in use and produces excellent RAW. Of course it has limitations, normal for the price range it was positioned on, but it still has everything you need to start shooting. When paired with good lenses it doesn't have too much to envy to much more expensive APS-C bodies, especially in daytime shots. The noise unfortunately begins to be annoying over 800 ISO and already at 1600 ISO the finest details are lost and are not recoverable in post production. Unbeatable quality/price. |
 | sent on 30 Maggio 2019 Pros: Cost, Wi-fi, lightness and compactness, LCD Cons: AF, solidity, MPX, low ISO seal Opinion: This was my first reflex. Initially it was able to cover the necessities I had in the open air and in the daytime, when I began to experience the night (or the closed) I realized to have in my hands a camera body that has quarreled with the ISO from 800 up. To be an entry-level is not bad: you can put it everywhere and weighs nothing; But at the moment you go outside of the optimum conditions by many noise problems, AF and image quality itself. I would recommend it as the first camera body for those who have never snapped. As for the 18-55 given in kit, it is in kit for a reason... |
 | sent on 19 Maggio 2019 Pros: Interesting price, WiFi, battery life, simple and intuitive menu for those who start, great possibility of choice objectives Cons: Autofocus not very fast, ISO tightness (in limited amount of light type indoors), there is no double ring (diaphragms and Times) Opinion: Great for beginners and those who plan to learn the basics of photography. I would not recommend it to an experienced audience or who wants to use it as a second body. Little, indeed very few differences with his ancestor 1200D. Personally I used it also with vintage lenses and did not behave badly, thanks to the live view and enlargements I managed to focus correctly. The 18-55 that they give regularly supplied is nothing special, indeed. I think I've used it very few times. Maybe a coupon used by someone trustworthy because no?!? |
|
| sent on 17 Ottobre 2018 Pros: Ease of use, WiFi Cons: ISO seal, suffers with autofocus in low light, focus points. Opinion: Excellent entry level for those who want to start to understand the operation of a reflex. Excellent in good light conditions but suffers a lot with low light having to raise the ISO already at 800 you have so much noise. However a good car for those who want to start without investing a lot but if the passion continues soon will be aware of these limits. |
 | sent on 22 Agosto 2018 Pros: Price, ease of use, sensor, display definition, compactness, grip, aesthetics Cons: High ISO (but forgifable), very small viewfinder and dark, lighting of the points for the confirmation of the MAF do not see if not in low light, touch keep the "beep" and remember which point you are using. If you use them all you do not understand which hooks. Unacceptable the absence of the Jack input for the microphone!!! Opinion: It's an entry level, and it was the cheapest SLR on the market until last year, so there's little to complain about. But I must say that, until now is the entry level economic most successful House canon, able to give really great satisfaction. Squeezing it well and flaning it with optics of a certain caliber, the satisfactions are many. In optimal light conditions produces very beautiful files, it exhibits well and the Auto WB always does its job very well, so much so that in PP I almost never touch it. It remains the most valid choice for those approaching photography and does not want to spend much: the new 2000d and 4000d are both a downgrade, 24 mpx are too noisy for this processor. |
 | sent on 02 Luglio 2018 Pros: Price, compactness, quality (relative to price), easy to use, battery life Cons: Iso seal, Gust, AF points, a little plasticosa, little customizable Opinion: I had the 1300d as the first machine and I must say that for the cost it has is perfect to approach the world of photography. Unfortunately it has some flaws like the small and dark viewfinder (but in the end almost all the APSC are so) very poor ISO seal, gust by 3fps (if I'm not mistaken), a few AF points... The body is quite plasticky but in the end done well and the machine very light and compact. With Canon you have a huge choice of lenses with very good quality/price ratios and that's good. |
|
| sent on 16 Giugno 2018 Pros: Price Cons: At this price no one, but if we really want to be picky: lack of jack for external microphone, non-orientable screen, high ISO performance not extraordinary, only 18mpx. Opinion: I don't think there is much to say about this machine: it has such a low price that it has approached a lot of guys like me to manual photography, and of these many have kept active the interest passing to higher-end cameras. I would never start taking pictures without the 1300d to entice me, and now I can't help it anymore. Tip: The 2000d and 4000d have just been released: The 2000d, while having the same sensor, is of a constructive quality lower than the 1300d but of higher price (since newer), while the 4000d is an excellent and worth updating of the 1300d. My advice is to avoid the 2000d, rather recovered a 1300d (Nonostant is out of production is still in Vendit, and you can find it also used) or if you have some more Soldino opt for the 4000d, or even the 200d! |
|
| sent on 14 Marzo 2018 Pros: Low cost, ability to use many manual controls and learn how to photograph, battery life Cons: ISO seal, burst in raw Opinion: It is my first DSLR, which has brought me closer to the world of digital photography. With little space it allows you to learn a lot, using it in manual and in the priority modes of times / diaphragms.rnLearning to exploit light well, and with quality objectives allows get great shots.rnPersonally I found the lens kit (18-55) a little 'poor, but to start may be enough, then as I did I can invest on real optics (like the L series) that will remain in the kit. rnWith this camera I have learned and I am really learning to photograph, so I can not talk about it too bad .... the real flaw? ISO tightness in low light conditions. 800 ISO is for me the maximum limit, rnOn this value, the images are acceptable are for mobile screen size.rnNontheless, after a year and a half I made 21,000 shots on many occasions, even sports, both indoors and outdoors.rnIn average the battery lasts me 800-1000 shots.rnComodo the Wi-Fi and the app on the phone to shoot remotely .rnrnIn dand, for what it costs, I consider it an excellent choice. Going back, however, I would have avoided the 18-55 de kit, perhaps in favor of 18-135 or higher |
  | sent on 05 Dicembre 2017 Pros: Cost, RAW quality, wide optical availability. Cons: It goes into crisis with the high ISO, pentaspecchio and non-pentaprism, slow burst but for the price you can not ask for more. Opinion: I took it for the irrepressible desire to have a camera, after almost 20 years of photographic fasting, to support the beautiful and versatile Fuji X30 but that does not have the possibility to change optics. I'm not a digital photo expert and initially I met several difficulties and was disappointed. Then I realized that I had to change the approach and so the 1300D despite its obvious limits is giving me a lot of satisfaction. The most obvious advantage? with little expense you enter the Canon ecosystem and you can use many original and universal optics. I think I will soon switch to another camera, probably Pentax reselling the Canon material, but for now I'm really satisfied with this little girl who learns to use it produces images that I like a lot.rnrnNon technical comments because I do not have sufficient preparation in that sense. I can only say that it is perfect to start with the digital SLR even if with the benefit of hindsight I would have bought, spending "only" 200 euros more, thePentax K-S2 at an "almost" entry level price but with semi-transparent characteristics. |
 | sent on 21 Agosto 2017 Pros: It costs a little, it's light, you can fit all the canon lenses Cons: Viewfinder Coverage Not 100% Opinion: If you buy a panda at 8000 euros you expect it to be 200 per hour and have leather interior? This is the 1300d; you have everything you need to get great photos with so many limits: high iso, burst, shutter duration , Robustness, no top lcd, few autofocus points only a serious defect for a car in this band is the lens cover not 100%, in some situations the photos are wrong because you never know what you can "take" on the edges external |
 | sent on 21 Agosto 2017 Pros: Reflex complete with price Cons: The orientable screen is missing Opinion: It is an accec so it is impossible to expect large holdings at high iso. The machine is complete and coupled with quality objectives gives really good results. The sensor is not particularly dense (which I appreciate) and the focusing system with quality lenses (but also with 18 55 stm) is very fast. It does not fit in all the situations where you get price with equipment such as photographic hunting or indoor sports. I miss the lack of an adjustable screen to read the snapshot data or have the live view in difficult positions. |
 | sent on 20 Agosto 2017 Pros: Lightweight, good quality construction, wifi, practical and easy to use Cons: Low hold on iso, no flame Opinion: The first reflex never forgets! I loved this little apsc, the one who introduced me to the world of photography. The price is really very cheap and is easy and practical to use and is really light. I recommend to anyone who wants to move the first steps in the photographic world or simply to those who do not want to spend astronomical figures for a car body. Great also wifi. It's a shame for the lack of anything to say the least, and the lack of the iso but for that price too good too |
  | sent on 20 Giugno 2017 Pros: Colors, good image quality, grain and raw quality Cons: Perhaps kept to high iso insufficient. Nothing else in relation to the price. Opinion: Taking it in addition to my admirers, I have to say that it does not flawless even with respect to the full frame "snooping". Good picture quality, sophisticating the dynamic range and, if you think about how much it costs, the difference even with the quadruple machines of the cost, you realize that it is not just a machine to start but also and above all to be a active companion Your pro kit. So I'd say it's ideal to start, but it's great to continue! |
 | sent on 28 Aprile 2017 Pros: Price, versatility, ease of use Cons: Low resistance to ISO, nothing else for the price Opinion: I'm a neophyte and decide the meeting between me and this car was the amazing bid to throw less than three hundred euros in a store a few miles from my home. What to say, take off of everything and his dirty work does it and well. Although an entry level has more than complete connectivity systems. One flaw? Does not hold high iso but nothing incorruptible in postproduction. Perhaps the menu is not the most intuitive but is really complete |
|
| sent on 04 Febbraio 2017 Pros: Small, light, cheap. Cons: You can not 'expect more than that, taking into account the price band. Opinion: I purchased to tile to my beloved EOS 50D, which now has done so many battles and I hope it will do so again, I find myself quite well, considered the fascai, the quality is comparable to the 50D, plus the wifi, it did not stop ISO as the 50D, but you can fly, I think that for those who know how to take pictures, it takes no time .... the pictures do not do the machines but the photographer, then a few bales, those coming from the film, knows what difficulties there are so .... Everything else is boring! |
 | sent on 04 Giugno 2016 Pros: Price, quality, connectivity, compactness. Cons: Few AF points, not reclining screen, high ISO performance. Opinion: I did yesterday a thorough test on the quality of the new Canon 1300D, the new jewel Entry Level.rnBrevemente, for the price it is really a must for beginners to take their first shots, and is beginning to enter the world of photography as it offers good image quality, and versatility of WiFi, with just three hundred euro.rnLa dynamic range is not at all bad, the exposure latitude when imported files is really discreet, and being a user of the 6D, i must admit I found that the differences are not so great. The focus points are perhaps a bit 'Pochini (9 with the central cross), and the flurry is nonexistent (3fps), the yield at high ISO (a bit' like the old 500D, 550D, 600D and 650D ) is very little used in difficult conditions, but overexposed at high ISO, you get good results once the file is put back to the correct exposure. The screen is not recliner, but there is thepossibility of having Live View and remote shooting directly on smartphones, so it's not a big problema.rnSe were novice, definitely would the body ideal machine to begin with! |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
