|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Giuseppe.p www.juzaphoto.com/p/Giuseppe.p  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Compact, lightweight, well made, bright, sharp, economical. Cons: None noteworthy. Opinion: A lens achieved, which does its duty, at a more than reasonable price. Despite the fact that the plastic construction returns a good feeling to the touch, the materials are of quality and the bayonet is made of metal. It is a pleasure to keep it mounted on the SLR given its lightness, also excellent performance in terms of image quality and sharpness, I did not notice problems of flare, vignetting or distortion, nor focus. The only drawback is the lack of versatility that is clearly common to all fixed lenses (which for this reason I do not particularly love), but this is already known at the time of purchase. Promoted with flying colors. sent on April 18, 2022 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: image quality, resistance to high ISO, file workability Cons: Metering imprecise with strong tendency to under-exposure, display, commands available Opinion: I used the 6D for about a year, starting from the pros, the quality and workability of the files is impressive, as well as resistance to high ISO really good in these respects is exemplary, good ergonomics, offering a FF sensor to a relatively low cost. However is an SLR with many compromises, and despite the excellent quality I was not convinced because of its contro.rnCome repeated in many reviews, the thing that leaves more to be desired is that the meter is calibrated in a truly unique, it should be understood. RNLA tendency to underexpose is evident, in my case the correct exposure was, in most cases to +2/3, but are not always able to solve the fly so compensating the exposure, because the exposure reading is sometimes unreliable. In some cases, the correct exposure is +1/3, much more rarely to 0, clearly I'm not talking about extreme cases, such as on snow, strong contrasts etc ..conditions in which it is normal that you can rely on little indication of the exposure, but of all situations "normal" whether it's sun, shade, day, night, interior, exterior, and regardless of the spot mode, evaluation, etc. used, the behavior was described. Brought the car to the CS, it has not been resolved nulla.rnCerto can be considered a "no problem" but personally I find it unacceptable that a FF 1600 euro, although an entry level in this area, has a metering system so low to regret bitterly to entry level APSC. rnInoltre it is a very controversial issue because the 6D holders are divided between those who laments the tendency to underweight and those who say they do not see the slightest mistake on the part of their exposure. rnVista the prevalence of this camera body, talk about it on the forum seems almost taboo because people who claim to have a perfect exposure they spend the"Question underexposure" to an urban legend born from mental disorders to those unfamiliar with the operation of the exposure. However the large number of people who are in agreement with what I say leads me to think that there is variability in yield between the various specimens, otherwise it would explain so much conflicting opinions. This situation suggests to me the idea of ??something built to savings and approssimazione.rnIl rear display seems to be built or covered in plastic, not very pleasant to the touch, scratches easily and without any protection is dim, the sun also provides the maximum brightness visibilità.rnLa little control layout is not intuitive and I did not like very much (maybe because I came from Nikon). Few focus points and all pretty central, personally I used mostly just rearranging Central. rnWifi and GPS for me useless, but someone can undoubtedly serve. sent on September 06, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Build quality, zoom range, image stabilization, sharpness, autofocus. Cons: 16mm distortion, vignetting, flare, overcharge. Opinion: The lens is built with quality materials and a feeling of solidity and strength, I understand a wide range of focal lengths is a great all-rounder, the 16mm are very helpful and you feel much difference with the classic 18mm. He has a good yield and is very sharp, very fast autofocus though not always precise, is equipped with the normal 16mm active.rnA distortion and vignetting are sometimes quite pronounced but correctable in post-production, for the vignetting is simple, distortion can not always be eliminated altogether, especially for what is on the edge of the frame. Another flaw of this perspective is the flare, always there if you do not use the lens hood .. but would not call it a real defect because the use of the lens hood eliminates the problem. rnTrovo that the sale price is really too much, I was able to make a comparison (not depth) with the Nikon 18-105mm and I could see that the 16-85 is superior in almost everything but I would have some doubts inthe state that the difference in yield between the two is enough to justify a price difference of more than EUR 300, whereas it is still a zoom and the brightness is not eccelsa.rnTutto all it is an excellent lens and I feel provide advice to people who want more of the classic 18-55, 18-105 kits. If you plan to upgrade to FF in the future, better think about or look in used because if you go to resell it, unlike other optical, does not keep all the worth buying, even if still under warranty. sent on March 08, 2015 |
 | Nikon D90 Pros: Ergonomics, build quality, reliability, battery life, available commands, double ring. Cons: Noise to "high" ISO, dynamic range, "a few" mpx. Opinion: Excellent reflex to start, the grip is very comfortable as well as the double ring, the controls are located in the right place and the building materials are excellent, it conveys the feeling of robustness of a body semi-pro camera, none of the current entry level Nikon is well done as D90.rnMacchina very reliable, used for three years did not give the slightest problem, the battery has an impressive length, it never happened to be out of the house with a dead battery. rnIl most important problem encountered (for me) is the noise at high ISO, to get a good picture quality can be used up to 800 ISO but noise is very visible before, in some conditions of light / shooting can happen to encounter noise in the sky even at ISO 200! RNLA dynamic range is good but not eccezionale.rn12 megapixels are more than enough if you do not make enlargements and not croppano the photos, but they are very few compared to what we offer current entry level and semi-pror. sent on January 18, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
