|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
AntonioAlessioM www.juzaphoto.com/p/AntonioAlessioM  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Wide range, lightweight, cost. Cons: Absurd bayonet unsuitable plastic weight, 18mm fake, dark. Opinion: A good all-rounder for street, little light and suitable for indoors or in low light with an external flash you can get decent shots. The 18mm seem incredibly more canvases of 17 of my current SIGMA. Bayonet Plastic is fine for a small fixed, for 18-55 but here in full extension the weight can ruin soon. The focus ring and soft seems fake and can also be moved in the AF mode. It sold almost immediately taking it. There are Chinese bayonets metal can adapt but their cost added to the lens does get the price of 18-200 which seems to be much higher! sent on May 28, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Light, cheap and with a good hike Cons: Hood ridiculous perhaps manufactured by lego Opinion: Bought a little more than € 200 and mounted on my d3300. I am new but I think in relation to its focal length is very great. I can in the beautiful sunny days just hanging out with what the 55mm back undoubtedly useful. Unfortunately is 300mm f5.6 and 55 is only 4.5; Whereas the 300mm are few for birdlife, Safari and photos to the stadium for other sporting uses and more than enough the af ultrasound does his duty. It is not a target for special purposes or special effects using wide open and just, will always be sharp. the hood interlocking is obscene, makes just disgusting! Compared with slightly more expensive Tamron 70-300 vc I have not noticed big differences perhaps in a bit darker but on the 70mm Dx force to continuous optical transmissions for more close-ups on tamron compared and overvalued photos that returns find them anyway a little too soft, then for use on Dx better this more versatile, lighter, cheaper andis primarily NIKON. The vr works fine I took 1/60 and 200mm without problems. Personally I do not think I go to FF because of the exaggerated costs of optical fx. Considering this vote 9! Metal bayonet! sent on May 17, 2016 |
 | Tokina AT-X 11-20mm f/2.8 PRO DX Pros: Price, quality feel, practical input button af-mf, good definition even at f / 2.8 (remember that is a wide-angle) Cons: heavy weight, maybe I would have preferred a still a longer focal length hair maybe 11-24 for use in enclosed areas without having to change the optical power to a close-up. Opinion: Rehearsed go against the views of another user, the focus for me or is manual or automatic, correct what the camera alone does with the adjusted commissioning programs focus means you have not set correctly, and then we do manually just tell you, the key is beautiful original and has the solid look. Some distortion is known only to short distances attempting a close-up but nothing sensational. At f2.8 is fine and is light, let us remember that it is a wide and far-field portion makes note the differences in light between the edges and the center indoors but either closes a thread or corrects PP. outdoor certain differences are not noticed. To say that the zoom range is not very wide but I also would be useful to a few millimeters in more not less being a wide angle is not a fisheye. I happened to use it at a birthday party, good group photos but the recovery of course celebrated too distorted. For the rest of an object and tastyheavy to carry with you. sent on March 23, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
