|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Nanni55 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Nanni55  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Pentax K200D Pros: The way it makes the images its CCD sensor, ease of use. Cons: The limits of a camera produced in 2008, example no live view. Opinion: I wanted to go back to using a SLR, I wanted to spend little, it attracted me to try again a CCD sensor. I happened to have a Pentax in my hands, but that Pentax. The renowned k200D with only a thousand shots, practically new (the advantages of consumerism). What can I say? You are amazed at how the images look, with a return to analog, the combination of sensor and processor gives rise to magical images, rich in colors, with an excellent grain characteristic, with a limited but excellent dynamic range and a lot of realism. If images are already a reason to have it, what about the rest? Although it lacks the performance of the latest cameras, this Pentax has everything you need perfectly placed, excellent handling and ease of use. Fantastic handle, well-positioned buttons and easy to use even with gloves, proper viewfinder using the O-ME53 lens (allows easy manual focusing) with all the information plus further external top panel. Good battery life, the common AA (so it is future-proof). Complete weatherproof. Fast focus, suitable for fast-moving subjects if you one the center point, however better than I expected. In addition, it has a very robust construction where savings have not been sought. I'm using it with its 18-55 and 50-200 goals. This small and lightweight kit I have no worries about carrying it with me. I have a field of view ranging from 27 to 300 mm and both are excellent. The noise even at 1600 iso is still good, it is beautiful the B / W reminiscent of the grain of the film. Overall I like this k200D and it's fun, easy to use with its basic but comprehensive menu. Using these "old" cameras you realize how complicated the newest ones are. For me simple equals better. The K200D is an SLR that stands the test of time, like so many film cameras. If you use it you will find that it is a more capable camera than you expect, it is not as fast as the current ones, but it is part of its charm, the aspect that gives the CCD the new ones can not give it to you, this is its spell. With her you will not be distracted by a thousand functions but you can focus on the exposure and composition. sent on March 08, 2022 |
 | Nikon Coolpix A Pros: Compactness, lightness, silence, sharpness and Nikon menu Cons: It can be a problem the 28mm for those who are not used to it. Autofocus in crisis in particular situations. Unavailable Opinion: Intrigued by the reviews of those who tried it, I bought this wonderful camera used in new conditions, it was not easy to find it since given the high price in 2013 they did not sell many. So it takes a little bit of luck. It is an alternative to the Ricoh GR with a more solid appearance being all metal and is built in Japan not China. Definitely higher quality index. It offers a NIKKOR 28mm f2.8 that gives, combined with an APS sensor of 16 million pixels, photographs of great quality for sharpness and three-dimensionality, a great BN. Autofocus performs well in normal situations, in difficulty with poor light. Those who don't know it mistake it for any compact, this allows you to be invisible, fantastic for street photos. You can put it in a pocket and then you can always have it at hand. Featuring the famous Matrix metering Nikon does not miss an exhibition, but if you want you can manage everything in manual, including focus. Really fun and not annoying camera to take with you, for those who use Nikon you will find the menu of reflex. Reading on the net you will find no complaints about dirty sensor, which with so obvious on cameras with collapsible lens. Recommended if you find it used in good condition do not let it get away. sent on February 12, 2020 |
 | Leica Digilux 2 Pros: CCD sensor with fantastic colors combined with the superlative LEICA SUMMICRON 28/90mm f2-2,4; This allows you to photograph with little light without the need to raise the ISOs too much with silent shutter. Zooming allows you to capture the scenes you need. The camera JPGs look good. Interesting the reflected light flash. Cons: You sell it because you want the camera with latest technology thinking it's obsolete and then you regret it. Leica no longer has spare parts and has been halting any repairs since 2015 Opinion: It can be considered "the vintage digital camera" there it is used as the old film cameras with the possibility of manual interventions. Introduced in 2004 it is still used by me, as the photos I get have something special compared to those I see from newer and more expensive cameras. The Digilux2 has quite a bit of charm and is often mistaken for an M. The color photographs are amazing, and the BN perhaps even better. The files are crisp and compact and easy to work with. Too bad Leica hasn't thought of an heir to this beautiful camera over the years. Maybe it was the Leica X Vario. sent on October 16, 2019 |
 | Leica X Vario (Typ 107) Pros: Easy-to-use camera, reduced to the bone menu, ideal for those who have used analog for years. fantastic lens with manual focus. Cons: Expensive object, but with strong depreciation in the used, rare thing with the brand Leica, perhaps causes bad reviews, which were based more on technical data than on seeing the photo generated by this little gem. You notice a battery life a little short (if you have a new one?) Opinion: I came across a great used at the Leica Store, so with a year of warranty, excellent build quality, very clean design that you hold well in your hand. The set of optics, sensor and processor allows you to retaliate with very sharp photos all over the frame with the classic Leica signature, for colors and three-dimensionality. Not suitable for photos with fast-moving subjects cause autofocus not suitable, there is still a great manual focus, which makes it really fun. Object to prove at the cost of the current used; I can guarantee that it will make you want to photograph. The Leica X Vario was introduced in 2013, heir to the famous Digilux2 resembling the zoom and quietness of the shot, but different for the sensor along with the higher ISO. A final consideration, of X Vario have been sold few, but much appreciated by those who own them. Strange? sent on October 14, 2019 |
 | Leica X2 Pros: timeless style, amazing goal. Cons: In the program I can not make more time 1/2 ?? Opinion: I visited the Leica store in Turin last week, he was exposed in the second-hand shop window. View the beauty with its clean lines, the excellent conditions of the camera and its packaging, not least courtesy of the manager of the store; I took her casa.rnLa'm 'using for some days. I find it adequate as rapidity 'dell'autofucus. L! Elmarit Optics has no problem of reflections against the light, I consider the lens hood superfluous, given the good anti-reflective coating of the lens. Superlative picture quality, excellent three-dimensionality., A pleasure to admire them. The APS sensor helps in noise reduction even though it comfortably at the excellent BN.rnForse I'll have to look for a viewfinder, I'm used to using it. With Oly version perhaps spare a po'.rnDimensione challenged enough compared to contenute.rnInteressante forms the availability of original accessories in the used market. I just bought a holster in a quality leather eccelsa.rnFotocamera Highly recommended to those who appreciate the &# 39; craftsmanship of Made in Germany. sent on February 03, 2017 |
 | Leica D-Lux (Typ 109) Pros: Camera that does not go unnoticed. The Leica brand remains an icon.rnVery good goal.rnControlli manual to amuse the amateurs.rnProduced in japan. Cons: I have not found anything negative, except that it risks becoming a collector's item, bringing out the fetishist side of the photographer. Opinion: I have been using her for a few months as an amateur photographer on the weekend, to my pleasure and to those who see her. Occasionally presented some noise in some photos (as the sensor was dirty). All resolved by going to the Leica store in Turin where I have highly recommended to make a complete reset of the machine.rnForse prefer a manual zoom, but its quality is superb.rnLo choice for the bright optics (I like to shoot without flash) and its great sensor.rnLe photos speak for themselves and show that we are facing one of the best compact cameras on the market, indeed I think the best.rnMi would like to read the thought of others on her.rnFatevi under! sent on June 24, 2016 |
 | Sony A3000 Pros: Low price, excellent sensor, lens with manual zoom, viewfinder presence, great photos and video. Possibility of manual focus. Cons: Viewfinder with not excellent quality, to iso 3200 becomes visible noise. Opinion: I bought a3000 with 18-55 in kit at a store like last piece unsold, being out of production the price has been instrumental in the choice. The first thing I checked was the viewfinder, indeed small, but worse than I thought, reading the reviews. Autofocus did not seem so slow, as you read. I prefer to prehensility traditional nex. excellent photo quality and video, will amaze you. The choice for the possibility of using Zeiss optics, although a little 'care, with excellent quality for sharpness and three-dimensionality. The council, if they are of good in used at attractive prices 300/250 €. The photos below speak for themselves. sent on May 03, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
