|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
V1nc3 www.juzaphoto.com/p/V1nc3  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: Body solidity, Zoom block (to prevent the lens from sharpening when "resting"), so much sharpness Cons: Colors of the yield a little cold, Aesthetically not nice, Noisy autofocus Opinion: A lens with, undoubtedly, many merits. Its constant openness, all over the focal length, the compactness, the solidity of the body, the masculinity of the whole lens make the lens in question greatly appreciate. The price, in line with the unsteady Tamron counterpart, is a nice pro to keep in mind when thinking of a standard zoom optics. The sharpness of the lens is remarkable, especially by closing the diaphragm a bit, but even at 17mm it makes very well with that slight wide-angle touch. The barrel distortion is contained, although it sins for a certain cold and slightly washed-out tone of tones (for me I love the rendium of Tokina 11-16, where the dominant hots fade), but easily corrected in post production. Nice lens for generic and street outings, cute for a bit of "macro" (close up), where the sharpness emerges immediately. A blade in the landscapes. Also great with slab filters, not having front that rotates. Great value for money, from nice satisfactions. sent on April 07, 2020 |
 | OnePlus 3T Pros: Quality of materials, Service, Display brightness, Update to Oreo, Slider notifications, Camera - in general, Speed ??of fingerprint reader, Face unlocking, DASH charge Cons: Front camera, SO support over time, audio volume, quantity of dedicated accessories Opinion: A smartphone that has its many advantages, and some, undoubted, defect. The price at which it was sold (after a year has already been "updated" by two models) was an undoubted affair. With its 6Gb of RAM and 128Gb - but there was also a 64-memory version for storage it was a best buy. Processor Snapdragon 821, cameras - both front and rear - 16 Mpx, AMOLED display, sensor and fingerprint reader very fast ceramic ... a little jewel.rnrnPhotography, with the application of "series" gives discrete shots. Results that, honestly, do not make a miracle cry. Under particularly favorable conditions, photographs render, but in more critical situations of brightness, however, the whole system falters. rnOptimo automatic HDR, works quite well. And above all does not distort the shot.rnProvata instead, lately, the Google camera, available in .apk on XDA and I must say that the result is quite different. HDR spettacular, surprising color rendering. A step, or rather a great leap forward. rnrnLe photos, work with Snapseed, then, improve enormously. In short, with PP and camera (App) right, promoted with flying colors. rnrnThe system is always fluid and reactive, never jamming and the upgrade to Oreo, after various uncertainties, has been a godsend. Epic battery life, you get in the evening, with the right use of the phone (gps and bluetooth perpetually active), smartwatch and smartband connected H24, use of Spotify in the car and with Bluetooth, with about 20%. Even more if you give up the gps during working hours.rnrnPromosso, happily. sent on January 29, 2018 |
 | Zenit Helios 44 58mm f/2.0 Pros: Quality of the construction material of the lens, despite the years on his shoulders - Great blurred - Wonderful sharpness in the center - Attack M42, perfect to be used on Canon - Price derisory that it recovers Cons: Washed-out - Little sharpness on the edge - not uniformity among the different specimens on the market - Very little bokeh typical, "swirl" Opinion: Zenit Helios 44 58/2 is one of the first optical Helios series 44-X (where X is a number between 2 and 7) and may also be available as a 44-1. Product, it is retrieved on the network, in version with different attack: M39, M42 and K, as many other optical Russian vintage, lack of uniformity and consistency in the quality between the different units available to buy on mercato.rnSi figures really negligible, although it lacks the typical bokeh "defective" other Helios - the known swirl - and it colors a little 'off, or rather very greyish / blue (but could easily be a feature of my model - 1972 type Jena , Latvia) that give little saturation and little liveliness to the image but that become perfect for shooting in black and nero.rnLo focus is scary, in the positive sense of the term. At maximum aperture, F: 2 is sharp and very well marked, which remains valid for 2.8 and as it closes up slowly to subside. Bokeh & egravis; perfectly circular, nervous and equity; It tends to deviate slightly oval edges, but in the form almost imperceptible. rnData the focal length, and use almost only on APS-C, is a great portrait lens and, in fact, performs its job very well. Makes, thanks to the focus, the skin much less "sharp" than many other lenses, without getting lost in highlighting the look (with focus on the eyes) .rnSulla my Canon 60D, with adapter provided with Electronic chip focus ( € 10) - remains manual, aperture control in manual - allows a correct operation even dell'esposimetro.rnPer the ridiculous price that is retrieved, about 20 € plus shipping, is an excellent purchase: costs very little, less the remote control for remote control of cameras and returns, with its obvious limitations, an incredible user experience! sent on December 23, 2015 |
 | GoPro Hero Entry Level Pros: Price, quality construction, Waterproofing, Compatibility accessories, Battery Life Cons: Do not pull the plastic shell, Little dynamic range, very saturated colors, size of output files Opinion: The small GoPro Hero (base) is an action-cam noteworthy. rnIl price, down, is a great incentive to buy a product that offers, among its strengths and weaknesses, the opportunities to enter the world GoPro - both wealth of software accessories and reliability - with a very minimal expense. Very often compared to similar products from Asian competition - SJ4000, rather than Xiaomi Yi - has, from its some merits, but suffers, since the price, some compromises. rnInnanzitutto is required SD performance. The room allows shooting at 1080p or 720p, which in both cases are of good quality. Only note (included in against) is the quality of the colors used in the filming of the Canon 60D and, first, the 550D the GoPro affected much of a low depth of colors and strong slavatura. Obviously all fixable in post production with a touch of color correction or adjustment of temperature - in the best cases. Unfortunately 1080p framerate is not high, but at 720pHe can resume at about 60fps without problems. rnrnIl output format of the file, not when the video, but the photo is limited to JPEG, you can not have RAW files - a real shame. For time-lapse is a nice product, but very limited: the range is fixed at 0.5 and not adjustable - obviously to have something more is also required, and rightly so, the use of better performing equipment. rnrnVantaggio, no doubt, is to have the classic attack GoPro for all accessories - original or not - that they do raise also figures quite negligible. It is not an advantage to have the built-in battery - not removable - and the inability to remove the protective plastic cover from the room - that in case of scratches or breakage should be sent to the assistance force. It 'still used an external battery pack, via wire, when in use, but with a waterproof cover is open or the door - both supplied - not impermeabile.rnrnAl price, now, for about 99 € is definitely a good product - same price, about, Asian competitors have, with some merit in most, but also some other compromise to be considered. sent on December 07, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
