|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Itos www.juzaphoto.com/p/Itos  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon PowerShot G7 X Pros: Objective bright, stabilized video very well, fully manual, compact, very soft zoom, external charger, excellent photos without flash even at 1000 ISO Cons: Flash pictures ugly, no 4K video, mechanical noise in focus, battery does not last long, a little 'pesantina, locking lugs goal delicate Opinion: From late December 2015 are a happy owner of Canon G7x with which I decided to replace my Samsung NX500 (that's right, a aps-c): rnrnHo made many shots of confrontation but apart from the undoubted versatility, in my opinion wins this machine! rnrnIl most sensor in the NX500 gains in wealth and color fidelity but (there's always a but), apart from a focus that's incredible I feel much more valid and precise on this model, the NX500 kneads a lot more in a condition low light (in the shots of every day, we mean ...). Obviously, if I have the chance to make a beautiful pose on a tripod the quality is superior on the NX500, accomplice larger sensor and more megapixels. But in the shots of everyday run indoors, kind birthday parties and so on, no flash there is nothing to do in this machine is amazing! About his super goal very light (from 1.8 to 2.8, although open to itSSIMA opening of 1.8 does not produce razor-sharp photos) rn rnal contrary, the objective included the NX500 is not of good quality, so I said, because I do not want spenderci a blunder is not much better off buying a lighter machine with goal Serial much higher? Well the answer is obvious! rnAnche tracking is phenomenal (but it works only in AUTO mode). The NX500 have never managed to get it going ... rnrnL'unico precisely is the noise of the focus often is almost annoying (and also made me think of a malfunction initially) and the sound of the zoom while shooting video ( yet it is very sweet and super speed stabilized). rnCerto, in terms of video, the NX500 the waste because in addition to having the 4K has more settings resume G7x. But though .. even here there is no history in everyday use: small, light, without the need for lens coverapplicable manually, this is soooo more practice! RNLA battery life (in my opinion) the right and then additional batteries are cheap (not the original). rnrnNon is fast in the burst (and the quality of raw I never tested and frankly I do not care) but enough for the amateur photographer. rnInvece definitely are not satisfied with the quality of pictures taken with flash .. there definitely lose at shorter distances. But personally I hate the flash so I never use it (but why do one star less). rnrnQuindi, in summary: as value for money, now (waiting for the new models come out in 2016) without a doubt I consider it the best buy possible. [Add then to the disadvantage of the Samsung NX500 which has left the sector and therefore it is a segment already dead ...] rnrnE to say I (which are extra-picky) you can trust! sent on January 08, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
