|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Roberto2574 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Roberto2574  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm X-Pro2 Pros: Resolution to all ISO, color depth, dynamic range, compactness, light weight, ergonomic (*), technology GOGO, aesthetically beautiful, easy to use and fast ... Very FAST. Cons: Battery life, the thumb grip very edgy, although customizable on other key lock standard exposure is a bit far away and we must get used. I would have preferred a button rather than having to press the front and rear selectors. Price. Opinion: For years I drooled for the X-PRO1 and when I could take it, I diverted my attention on the X-T1 (a real gem). Now it has just output the X-PRO2 I decided and I did the c ..... ta. The body is amazing although aesthetically very similar to the X-PRO1. To the touch, however, it is much more sturdy and robust and feels that it is made in a single block copolymer of magnesium. Apart from the exposure lock button which, in my humble opinion, is too far to the left the rest of the keys is in the right place. Everything is comfortable and then everything is customizable: the hybrid viewfinder. A pleasure !!! Customizable to the core, you have 3 viewfinders which can then become a "5". It has the classic OVF where we see through a glass, and inside it has screened all the useful info at the click. In addition, both according to the optics that the shooting distance, the inner frames fit and help to compensate for parallax avoiding cropped pictures. When shooting with the OVF you go back in time but with a futuro.Si machine also has available an OVF size that always lets you see directly but very enlarged scene. Then there is the EVF is the classic electronic viewfinder which is also located on the X-T1 (this has more resolution). I said "5" viewfinders because with a simple movemento the front lever can be activated on each OVF a micro DISPLEI rising from the bottom of DX, where in addition to helping to focus, gives a preview of the white balance and exposure. The iso start at 200 and arrive at 12800 without extension. I did it deliberately photos in the dark at high ISO and the result is, the own and I can say, that the 5D MK3 you can really throw it in the bin. The dynamic range is very good (much higher than Canon), the colors are gorgeous and the white balance a masterpiece. But what amazes a lot is the speed of both the porcessore that focus: lightning. The focus points are either 77 or 273 and I knowno finally managed by a small joystick / button that plays very well his task. Many commands and utilities were already present on the X-T1 and improved to this body. The pain points are always the same. Price you pay for (as well as the novelty). The battery a little bit ridiculous, and so you need to stock up on Patona. so I think the designer who has designed this machine has forgotten a fillet radius between the rubber grip and magnesium body. The thumb fits into a 90 ° angle is not very ergonomic (*). And then the selectors, two small rings that rotate with the thumb and forefinger (front and back of the body) also can be crushed. The latter one, in particular s erve to activate the electronic zoom for manual focus (and not) but not protruding from the body so it has the feeling of utilize the nail to crush him. I really liked although its function is interesting. That dirre: try for in Namorarsi. I have purchased a 35 f2 WR. A little monster and I have not tried the other optical I own. Soon I am posting some shots. Hello to all sent on March 05, 2016 |
 | Pentax SMC M 50mm f/1.7 Pros: Economic, crazy sharpness, light and small. Metal body. Cons: If being vintage and completely in manual is a sin ...... Opinion: Crisp colors. If not used in TA returns saturated colors and sharp images. Used for portraits is phenomenal. Very nice bokeh effect. With little more than € 50 you take home a piece of the history of photography and a nice glass. The metal construction gives a solid feel that only certain objectives forward. A word of advice before buying is to check the presence of dust and mold. We always talk about cars which have more than 30 years some signs them can (and should) have. To give a sense of professionalism to seek the advice hood (maybe metal). The original rubber and aesthetically I think it is not the best. sent on September 24, 2013 |
 | Pentax SMC DA 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AL WR Pros: Lightweight and compact, very sharp from f5.6 onwards and from 35 to 55. Cons: Under the values ??I mentioned is of reasonable quality. Opinion: Used in the right range produces images of some importance. Despite being one of zoomino kit is always a good zoom. Tropcalizzato, lightweight and versatile. Very sharp at focal lengths from 35 to 55 is at his best after f5.6. Therefore I agree with "is dim ..." but it has its place in the bag. I really like the care that Pentax puts in the design of its objectives, considering that on the hood have a crack Decree (opens a small door) in order to act on the filters without removing it. Not much, but gains points .... sent on September 24, 2013 |
 | Pentax K-5 II Pros: Fast AF as all the competitors, strength of body, simple controls, ability to use the old K mount lenses, ergonomics, waterproof, image quality, silensiosità, made at high iso. Cons: Menu "one way", battery grip with only one battery, low battery signal not just gradual. Opinion: I inherited from my father, an old Pentax Super MA, wanting to combine a second body to the 7D I thought, having a complete set analog, I would have been able to continue to use even with digital. Now I am to have a park objectives of good quality (some very good) with the least expense. The machine is fabulous. Defect of the Pentax not have wanted publiciazzare such as Nikon and Canon his machines. The machine in the hands of the solid balanced feel as weights even with heavy lenses. The files are fabulous already in the car. With little PP can get beautiful images and high contrast. The white balance and color in the car is one of the most advanced I've ever seen. Small neo menu, you have to slide it around to get where you want, while in canon is "faster." The use of vintage lenses is a pleasure, simple and very reliable. The high iso then have no history. The ISO 1600 are equivalent to 600 ISO the 7D. Gust high. The advice above all to those who have never tried a Pentax. Is notffatto a toy. The only plastic that is located on the flash pop up ..... Try it YOU WILL NOT REGRET ...... PS: To those who say that there are no targets will list some brands: Pentax, Tokina, Tamron, Vivitar, Sigma, Schneider-Kreuznach lens, Cosina, Carl Zeiss Lenses, Ricoh, Voigtlander, Quantaray etc ... ciaooo sent on September 24, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
