|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Pacos13 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Pacos13 ![]() |
![]() | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 (1987 version) Pros: Ghera for focus, distance scale, sharpness, small size Cons: Noisy autofocus, nervous blurry Opinion: Very simple lens, with distance scale, focus ghera and front lens that does not rotate. Up to f/4 has a fairly pronounced vignette and poor sharpness at the corners, but does not present significant chromatic aberrations. The focus is thanks to an AFD engine that, although it makes it faster than the Mark II to hook (it is comparable to the micro-Usm of the f/1.4), emits a deadly sound. Another defect can be found in the diaphragm, which has only 5 slats that make the blurry nervous. As various objectives of the past it has different characteristics between one specimen and another, and if you are lucky you find something really good. I found a specimen with excellent clarity and micro-contrast, with which remarkable results are already achieved at full opening, while I have tried others that have turned out to be good but not at the same level. Ps. One thing to check is that it doesn't suffer from front/back focus sent on January 05, 2021 |
![]() | Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Pros: Focal range, beauty of blurry, price Cons: Slow autofocus, low sharpness, front lens rotation during focus Opinion: The lens is unclear, particularly over 200mm, has noticeable chromatic aberrations when used at full aperture and has a slow and noisy focus. However, it turns out to be a very practical lens, with a 58mm filter case, with a lampshed common to other targetses (85mm f/1.8 Usm, 100mm f/2 Usm) and with a very pleasant blur (also thanks to the 8-slat diaphragm). Compared to later models it looks a bit older but looks slightly less plastic. sent on December 31, 2020 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me