|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Bodishet www.juzaphoto.com/p/Bodishet  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 24mm f/1.4 G ED Pros: Spatiality, sharpness, solidity Cons: "Comes out" really with proper bodies, of course megapixels Opinion: Absolutely extraordinary lens, you really appreciate it for what it's worth only with equally extraordinary bodies. With the D850 is absolutely monstrous, incredible detail, nuances of fairy tale color, truly a moving rendition. I tried it in comparison with the 24 Art, with the 25 Zeiss and with the Nikon 14-24 but on the 45 mpxl there is no story, the Nikon 24 F 1.4 seems to comparison seems to be built on Mars while others seem broken. Excellent on set portrait and street, autofocus fast and especially accurate. And there is to say that it is one of the few optics from the appropriate price, really worth that bang that costs! They are also excellent used around 1000-1200 euros, and at that price is a bargain. I feel sorry for those who think differently but the comparison with art is really irreverent, there is no history... sent on November 26, 2018 |
 | Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 Pros: It's all a pro, hard to make a list .... Cons: Lens caps not level Opinion: It would be wrong for anyone trying to hazard a comparison between the old 85 and the new Milvus, they are two completely different worlds. The old man was a "pacioccone" lens, soft, suitable for all seasons. In short, neither meat nor fish, and it is no coincidence that Zeiss has completely redesigned the Milvus. A monster has come out of it, and I do not exaggerate. In the face of a certain size and a record weight of 1250 gr. the Japanese-Germans have produced an incredible lens, capable of excelling practically everything. Unbelievable sharpness even in open diaphragms, three-dimensionality, fantastic bokeh, it seems to be within the scene. Unrivaled construction and valuable materials in Otus-style, maf ring a little abundant (you will not find well those who have very small hands) with very reduced run. Defects? We could talk about light vignetting at TA (although very pleasant), but the scandalous thing are the front and rear caps, really not level. Conclusions? It is absolutely one of the best lenses ever for my house, and I come from Nikon AFS 85 f 1,4G and 105f 1,4E, to understand each other. In this context, the price is not at all high; on the contrary, I believe that for the absolute value of the object it is also low. Naturally, it is recommended to all those who love these masterpieces of optics and mechanics! sent on February 12, 2018 |
 | Nikon Df Pros: the sensor Cons: It needs to write a novel .... Opinion: Clearly the Df is a marketing operation desired by Nikon to capture a vintage band customers. Many take it convinced to find the strength of the old analogue They were confounded, the outer cover is made of pure plastic and the body of the D600 is modest. On the other hand shortcomings are many: from compattona battery, AF laughable (plus with points concentrated in the center and without illuminator), one slot for the memory card, the battery grip is not expected, the car ISO better to draw a veil pitiful. The sensor is very good of the D4, but even there the technology has moved on. The cost for what it offers is absolutely out of the market, I struggled just to sell my 1700 Euros. I also read rave reviews but CRDO that person who wrote them have never felt a D750 or D810. Or has a Df to sell ... sent on August 16, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
