|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Besigma www.juzaphoto.com/p/Besigma ![]() |
![]() | Sigma SD14 Pros: Solid body and nice handle, made sensor detail, color depth, dynamic range, 98% viewfinder, good value for money used raw files (x3f) with large amounts of information, the presence of the upper display configuration. Cons: However over slow (3 sec x store at least a picture), cmq about 8 photos in buffer, color casts but only accentuated x incorrect configuration of AWB (corrected on Raw), lcd useless, autofocus is not always accurate, low duration of battery, jpg poor. Opinion: This machine is an excellent project born evil ... mounting the 3-layer Foveon sensor (RGB) without anti-aliasing filters, high output in detail, truly unique I would say ... with only 4 megapixel front detail makes at least bayer sensors of about 15-18 mpx, deep in the rendering image comparable to a FF 12mpx about (see canon 5d MK1 - Kodak DCS PRo) ... Once the white balance on RAW or before shooting through the click of balance, color rendering is unique, full and without adding saturation and detail via software. From the best with macro lenses, EX-series, fits only sigma lenses via adapter or screw, is slow and inaccurate, hard to get similar results on 2 shots, but if you search for the image quality finished today can still have their say in spite of the 'age ... The yield is very low above 400 ISO, but this forces to have an approach similar to what you had with the click Analog, then for those who studied the photo is a real pleasure to work with this maccina. Not recommended for those who approach for the first time in digital photography and those who want the shots ready for printing or display, however, can be a beautiful photographic discovery for those who have time and passion to devote to shots that are truly unique and "personal" ... I use different machine, but like most of the people who have approached the Foveon, whenever shooting with sensors bayer I wonder, with a bit of regret, what I could do if I had taken with Sigma ... Recommended for those who want to experiment and rediscover sensations from analog sent on January 07, 2012 |
![]() | Canon 60D Pros: Display, light weight, low noise and burst Cons: Noise filter will damage the detail Opinion: Held for about 1 year, nice car, nice management and consistent in performance, beautiful in night or in low light. I've loved for macro (sigma goals, unfortunately never tried canon L series), the anti-aliasing filters and correction of equipment noise will damage the detail and brightness, although certainly the whole is not very visible in small prints. Let's say there is almost always goes on the safe side but I was never able to find the result very surprising, perhaps you would have to invest more on lenses with higher risolvenza seen on the high resolution sensor aps-c. Positive vote anyway, I do not think is the true heir to the 50D. sent on January 02, 2012 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me