RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Giovanniceccarelli
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Giovanniceccarelli



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Giovanniceccarelli


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

sony_fe35_f2-8zaSony FE 35mm f/2.8 ZA Sonnar T*

Pros: sharpness in TA, resistance backlight (contrast, flare), distortion, size, lens hood, weight, silent af

Cons: for now, no.

Opinion: I mount it on a7s and after reading many reviews, I decided not to trust the reviews. A TA is sharp from edge to edge (while networking turn of the samples which, in my opinion, are defective models). RNLA made in the backlight is spectacular, does not lose contrast and flare is practically zero. Contrast and colors zeiss.rnPer me is a great lens at a good price. The fact that 2.8 is not a problem for me, and for those who wanted the 1.4 is coming out that will have a completely different size, weight and cost. The autofocus is silent. The lens hood is invisible and does his job.

sent on October 07, 2014


sony_135_f1-8Sony 135mm f/1.8 ZA Carl Zeiss Sonnar T*

Pros: construction, f1.8, colors, three-dimensional, sharpness (already impressive TA), blurred.

Cons: weight (eg. compared to canon 135), the cost compared to the other.

Opinion: I use the 135 for a few months. Excellent construction, solid, nice to see. Sharpness, progression of fuzzy, three-dimensional, color gradevolissimi. Made uniform throughout the frame. rnProbabilmente the best 135 in circulation. One flaw weight ..! It looks like he's going to get out of the SSM version, so the price may drop a bit Charity '(currently around 1000 €, 1700 € new).

sent on June 18, 2014


tamron_17-50Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD

Pros: Aperture 2.8, price

Cons: construction, cool colors, sharpness at 2.8, chromatic aberrations

Opinion: After reading many reviews I decided to buy it. And regretted it. I never had any feeling with this lens, its construction plasticky did not give me the impression of having a quality product. A 2.8 is blurry and suffers from quite a few AC. Returns the color freddi.rnPer me is not worth the 300 Euros just for the fact that after a while 'you feel the need to do an upgrade ... better to save for a little' more time and go to a view migliore.rn

sent on October 14, 2013




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me