|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Diepao www.juzaphoto.com/p/Diepao  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon 1 J2 Pros: Shutter speed, 10 mpx machinable, ISO 3200 (6400 in "boost) with acceptable noise if we remain on amateur photos Cons: Battery, flash a little weak Opinion: I state that I use this machine purely for amateur use. It can be a machine for professional use if it is used making shots with good light (then up to 800 ISO) and for uses that do not require the detail that can give a FF or at least a modern APS. Despite that I bought it in 2018 (and for some it may seem insane) and with "only" 10 mpx, I was impressed by good quality up to 6400 ISO, remembering that the use amatorially for 95% of cases. It has a phenomenal shooting speed, therefore exceptional for sports, even weddings (moments less topical, maybe during the celebration, I would avoid the ceremony especially in dark places even if it could make a difference the skill of the photographer). It has enough goals to cover almost everything from wide angle, telephoto, and if not enough, you can buy an adapter for the lenses used in the APS, obtaining Super Tele (has a factor crop x 2.7 then a 100 mm becomes a 270 mm!) The only flaw for this series, is the battery, that you download quickly, you can do 350-400 shots, better to buy a couple of reserve if you think of taking many photographs during the day. The flash is a flaw in the middle, because it is not very strong, but still fully satisfies its function in almost all the moments required. In summary, to have a sensor of one inch and only 10 mpx, takes wonderful photographs, and you have everything you need for almost all situations, and you do not require impossible things like scraps and have to print in formats above A4. sent on December 21, 2018 |
 | Pentax SMC DA 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AL Pros: To be a lens kit: chromatic aberrations often absent or reduced without the software of the machine, very good detail, excellent sharpness, af fast while using the car engine, because good focal range from wide angle to normal. Cons: Slight vignetting at 18 mm, underexpose by 0.3 stop by 50mm, to be set, it remains a lens almost top! Opinion: A lens that I do not think so good to be kit, I found the good as the 18-55 kit lens of sony that is best only for macro compared. A detail of the images really good, we're on the excellent sharpness, af just right for a Pentax, is not as slow as many say, aberrations really ridiculous and often absent in comparison of a lens as Sigma or Tamron to buy separately leggermenti more cari.rnHo found that all Pentax lenses, even the kit, are processed in a special glass that other "super famous" brands do not, allows this work, really quality above average despite the kit, which is why a little costicchiano more, and all those coins are worth more if I had to buy it separately but fortunately it bought in kit! sent on July 17, 2015 |
 | Pentax K-30 Pros: 16 megapixels, ISO management above average, solid body with comfortable grip and "close", intuitive, simple clarity of content, autofocus takes well even in low light slightly over competitors in the same price range (not quality), detail sharpness and photo as the full frame of 2-3 years ago, pleasing aesthetics and aggressive, DNG file, great for workability and to convert to other formats, autofocus motor room, good battery life in my opinion below average of Canikon.rnScatto up to 1 / 6000s Fast for a prosumer aps; AA reduced filter you see the enormous detail, noise pre factory set in "gray mode" that is up to 6400 ISO you see a film like grain and non grain colored pictures worse than it is but natural. Cons: Autofocus speed good but room for improvement, usb car slow to download photos on pc, battery life good but not great, a little buffer reduced, even with SD as a fast 90 MB / s for writing, not more than 12 consecutive raw (burst mode ), has 25,600 iso, iso too many leads you to a purchase dishonorable for beginners as first SLR Opinion: Speaking of pros and cons is easy, talk about how you are after one year with this car it is really the right thing to do, to express the experience with 20,000 photos in one year makes the machine right from idea.rnUna 'beginning gave me the idea of ??strength and grip (grip) truly outstanding, used in the rain with suitable objectives and tropicalization made his lavoro.rnAmo usually print the photos in large 70x100 minimum, up to 120x180, the rendering iso is spectacular in my opinion, in the prints of 70x100 you get a beautiful grain to ISO 4000 and the colors and details are not lost much. Above 4000 ISO, discourage the prints over 40x60, ok for 20x30.rnPosso say that for an APS sensor with a sony so good, I am setting a limit iso 1600, sometimes 3200. For professional photos no later than 1600 ISO, you can still take pictures for marriage, baptisms and other events indoors, maybe with a good flash and photographic techniques from utilizzare.rnE 'machine "perfect" for those who think that the machinena camera is a tool for taking photographs, and not for those who think that it takes the "super" machine to take pictures buone.rnSi ranks among the pro-sumer, and still is a matter of marketing, because if you can take a picture as you want, then visit te.rnMi mind on the one hand that Pentax Ricoh today, think of making out a FF, because it loses the mental placement of super specialist for APS antonomasia.rnFinendo can tell you: it is technically a super good, and always technically, I see no point in trying more expensive machines, if anything, would invest on optic optical giuste.rnLe all with bayonet K, we can exploit those from about 70 years onwards, and prices are ridiculous manual lenses panic, for people like me who like the manual and the blurring of qualità.rnVoglio give an information, which is to destroy the myth that Pentax has a few optics in its catalog: They are all optical APS and some viable for the future FF, and 44 are lenses for APS against 15- 20 of the competition, so I guess not too many pochis! Not to mention the brands outside compatibili.rnHo discovered something that many Canonikonisti bite their hands, this model, like all of Pentax, the setting has to remedy the back and front focus in case there was a need, and on my Sigma I suffer from a back focus after setting the machine, the problem disappeared ... Great Pentax! sent on June 30, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
