|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Rossoduc www.juzaphoto.com/p/Rossoduc  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS C Pros: Excellent sharpness, easy to handle, top quality / price ratio Cons: The only flaw is that there is no multiplier on the market. Opinion: Many complain about the lack of the tripod ring, but given the cost and knowing it from the beginning you can not judge it as a lack, with less than € 50 I took it through the internet and end. What matters is the quality of the glass and here we are, center in full. Even at full aperture it goes great at all focal lengths and a slight drop to 400 mm. you can see it only by going to magnify in an exaggerated way and all at just over a third of the cost of the Sony. For those who make occasional use, but not only, it is definitely convenient, If used on APS-C it becomes an excellent 150 / 600. For me who have a Sony kit both FF and aps-c I find two lenses to use, to choose, depending on the need. As mentioned, a good 1.4x multiplier would be useful. We remain hopefully waiting. sent on January 02, 2023 |
 | Minolta 50mm f/1.4 RS Pros: Small, light, sharpness, detachment of the planes, excellent blurred. Cons: For me there are none. Opinion: ; I used it on minolta film and then with KM 7D and then with Sony A 700 to finish at A 99. It is a certainty, the results are always beautiful, and even with 24 MP it behaves beautifully. Closing even just one diaphragm the sharpness is exemplary. With the 99 the AF is definitely fast and precise In this objective I find only merits and no defects. sent on April 12, 2022 |
 | Sony A7 II Pros: For what it costs, everything. Cons: For what it costs, nothing. Opinion: Purchased used a couple of years ago to reuse my old Minolta MD lenses. After a while I bought the ea la4 ring to reuse the Minolta AF optics as well. I did not want to throw money into bodies that after three years are devalued by 70/80 %, the 24 mp for me are enough and advance and not cropping if not very limitedly, I do not feel the need for big MP. I put a non-original BP on it and the weight is absolutely not decisive. The batteries do not last long but weigh and cost little so, in my opinion, they are not a problem. Even the much reviled "slow" AF, so slow is not, if you set the camera correctly of out-of-focus photos come very few. I'm talking about athletes moving at a speed of about 50 km/h. The noise is there but even here it is a matter of set the machine well to see it reduced by a lot. Excellent file quality and colors may need some PP retouching but it depends on personal tastes and the quality of the lenses used. Nothing that you can not fix in posts with a few clicks. Stabilization works very well, if someone then looks for the moon they can turn elsewhere. It's definitely not the perfect car but with a little practice you get pretty close. sent on September 05, 2021 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
