|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Beppeverge www.juzaphoto.com/p/Beppeverge  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 L IS USM Pros: Compact, low weight, sharpness, excellent construction, very effective stabilizer. Cons: Tripod ring not supplied. Opinion: I've had this lens for a few years and I've always liked it right away. A good leap in quality compared to other Canon lenses of similar focal but not L, it has good sharpness from the maximum aperture and allows you to make excellent quality photos at all focal lengths. For me the real strong point is in compactness, this lens really surprises for the quality it offers with dimensions that allow you to carry it even in relatively small bags, to support what I wrote I can say that I meant to sell it after The purchase of 70-200l f/2.8 II But I kept it because of the ease with which I carry it on every occasion, the 70-200 2.8 is certainly superior (except in the construction and the stabilizer) but it is big, heavy and expensive, I prefer it for sports and Portraits but for landscape or generic use the 70-300l does not make me regret leaving home the 70-200l. Among the merits I would also put a very nice fuzzy. Update: I sold the 70-200 F/2.8 and held the 70-300l, a choice matured mainly for the lowest weight and overall dimensions of the latter. sent on January 26, 2017 |
 | Samsung NX3000 Pros: Price (when it was on offer), lightweight and compact enough, good resistance to high iso and overall quality of the file more than good with a good workability of the RAW. Great lens standard display tilting the camera is used immediately in a very intuitive, menu done well. Cons: I miss the optical viewfinder, but not a hand, it is a feature of the model, external flash (supplied), nothing else. Opinion: I replaced my Canon G12 with this and the benefits have been enormous, file quality amazed me right away and use in general appeared to me immediately intuitive and easy. I find that the MAF is very good on any occasion, perhaps with low light does not work as my 6D but the performance is more than accettabile.rnL'ho used on several occasions leaving behind the SLR and the result has never disappointed me, I think that coupled excellent 16-50 is comparable to any other mid-range SLR, indeed, it is even better except probably use for sports photos where the viewfinder and autofocus better performance of an SLR should make a difference. rnConsiglio undoubtedly the purchase of this camera. sent on October 06, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
