|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fulvio Saccoccia www.juzaphoto.com/p/FulvioSaccoccia  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Minolta XG-1 Pros: Construction, small footprint, aperture priority Cons: Viewfinder a little 'dark Opinion: Very robust, flawless mechanics. Semiautomatic, two modes: aperture priority and fully manual. In the first case, the diaphragm is set by turning the lens ring is mounted, the machine chooses the most suitable time on the basis of the indication of the exposure meter. Touching the shutter button, the time will be used is shown in the viewfinder, which is a time scale and a red dot appears next to the value in use. ASA films selected: 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200. The viewfinder is slightly dark - but it can be a problem due to opacification due time. Self-timer to 10 seconds and the button for controlling charge / discharge of the batteries. The silhouette is slim and compact machine is the outlet. sent on December 08, 2015 |
 | Minolta MD 70-210mm f/4 Pros: Sharpness, bokeh, microconstrasto Cons: Weight, size Opinion: I mention this objective reporting what is written on an external site (digitalrokkor.altervista.org/minoltalens_zoom.html): "Objective produced by Minolta in the early '80s and built for Leica in the following years as Leitz Vario Elmar R 70-210 4 (is the successor to the MD Rokkor 75-200mm f4.5, also built by Leica as Vario Elmar R 75-200 4.5). The optical efficiency is excellent (as also for the previous version) and mechanical construction is such as to make it actually "perfect". This is undoubtedly one of the best tele zoom manufactured by Minolta for optical quality and especially mechanical. It reaches the position Macro 1: 3.9 to 210mm with a minimum focusing distance of 1.1m. The diaphragm 9 blades gives it a good return on bokeh. The performance is very similar to that of a fixed lens with excellent color rendering, nice focus, good contrast and sharpness (especially for medium and short distances). They were, however, detected some chromatic aberration, especially to major openings diaframmto. Other shortcomings of this objective are the weight and excessive clutter. It 'was revived in the system of Minolta AF (also known under the name "beercan"), in 1985 approximately, with identical optical design of the MD. "RnrnPersonalmente I consider it an excellent lens, with a yield already good at f / 4 and amazing closing; the resolution is high at every focal, losing a minimum 210mm. From what I can understand - not an expert - the acutance is very high. I was extremely impressed by the sharpness and overall performance, the lens returning sharp images , engraved and color fidelity. The post-production is minimized if anything was really necessary. The use of both digital, with Nikon D3200 + adattaore Fotodiox that on film, Minolta XG 1.rn sent on December 08, 2015 |
 | Minolta Rokkor MD 28mm f/3.5 III Pros: Image sharpness, blurred hard, sharp (for me, a pro) Cons: Difficult to use, the dark Opinion: It 'a lens that I use on Nikon D3200 via adapter ring Fotodiox, with a lens for correcting the draft. The lens makes me very entertained and use it exclusively for macro, given that the minimum distance of focus and 'less than 30cm. The blurred and 'pretty tough, but I really like just because' so different from other dedicated optics; sometimes it really seems to not get a photo but an image painted brushes. The difficulty 'in using it and more I find' in the manual focus, but the fun is even there. sent on October 27, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: hiking, weight, VR, versatility, autofocus Cons: openness, clarity in apertures Opinion: I found in the 18-105 kit with the D3200 very versatile; zoom range makes it suitable for many situations. Does not excel in sharpness but the photos taken between f / 8 and f / 22 I meet a lot and in my opinion, the lens of these diaphragms from the best. The VR is great for me, I shot handheld at night up to 1 second! The result was very good and you can check in my galleries. Autofocus is fast and precise even in low light. sent on June 04, 2015 |
 | Minolta MD Rokkor 50mm f/1.7 Pros: Sharpness from f / 2.8; color rendering; solid construction, weight and bulk content. Cons: Sharp decline of sharpness at maximum aperture, sensitivity 'to flare Opinion: Using this target, with an adapter ring lens for correcting the draw, on Nikon body, without any problem. Still do not text at the bottom but from an initial assessment - from simple amateur - I can say that his strength is in excellent sharpness from f / 2.8, despite a sharp drop at f / 1.7. The lens returns true colors; and there are no obvious chromatic aberrations (just a picture, in my experience, showed an aberration green and in this case the photo was taken with a multiplier). The contrast and 'greater than other goals I have in use. Excellent performance even in low light conditions. The biggest problem I faced and 'sensitivity' to flare: If the sun and 'inside angle shooting, the photo will have' obvious purple hexagons, more 'or less extensive depending on the aperture in use. The focus ring is via fluid, without games, with excursion contained. The diameter of the UV filter that I mounted and '49mm, while the tab above shows 55mm. sent on April 16, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
