|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Maxj www.juzaphoto.com/p/Maxj  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Voigtlander E 21mm f/3.5 Color-Skopar Aspherical Pros: Sharpness from center to edge, color rendering, lightness, compactness, optical and construction quality, resistance to reflection and for me also aesthetics. Cons: no one as long as they don't want the impossible Opinion: Purchased used but as new at half the list price, it brought me closer to wide-angle photography a little more pushed than the 24 which has been so far the widest angle lens I had ever used. With the Sony a7s it has an exceptional rendering for colors and sharpness, you want to go to enlarge beyond the physical limits given by the resolution of the sensor to observe the details even at the edges. F 3.5 is fine given the price and compactness and with the A7s not afraid of high iso is not a limitation at all. Excellent the minimum focusing distance and to be a wide-angle even the blurred is great. It is worth everything it costs, even at the price of the new. The color rendering is warm and rightly saturated and the 10-point star light effect is really pleasant. It has a remarkable resistance to reflection against light. Manual focus is fast and precise thanks to the focal length, focus peaking and magnification of the viewfinder or monitor of the A7s also thanks to the contacts for Sony, the aperture used and the other exif data of the shot are recorded. Worth a full 10. sent on August 28, 2021 |
 | Sony FE 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: Cost, size, weight, autofocus, sharpness in the center and stabilization Cons: Sharpness at the edges, variability perhaps in the quality of the specimens Opinion: I had two examples of this objective kit taken with a second-hand A7S. The first one was not good having differences between the right and left edge, with the left less sharp. Given back the first one that was made in china (but it is only a note not to say that all those made in China can be defective) I recently bought back a second always second hand and very little used that turns out to be made in Thailand and that instead does not suffer from this defect at just over 100 euros. Noticing that it is a kit lens and that you can not compare it to Zeiss or G Master I do not find it as poor as we read in many reviews, unless the negativity of some comments is due to poorly released specimens and therefore to poor quality control of the manufacturer. As a lens to be used every day, without pretensions of super brightness of the diaphragm and resolve at the edges, because in the center it is more than good, it does its good work coupled to the A7S sensor and you can get great results. I believe I will not sell it but I will keep it paired with the 7S because on certain occasions I can get good shots without loading my back, waiting to take an A73 or rather an A9 and flank it with a glass corresponding to the potential of the machine. sent on March 14, 2021 |
 | Samyang FE 35mm f/2.8 AF Pros: Excellent definition in the middle, good at the edges, even from the most open diaphragms. Lightness and size, good autofocus, price. Cons: Looks like a toy. Opinion: Bought second-hand with just under a year to use it on a Sony A7S and replace the 28 70 in kit. For what it costs also new is definitely a lens to have in the kit. The 35 is a bit of an all-rounder lens for light and thoughtful exits. Excellent definition in the middle and good at the edges even at 2.8, good autofocus even if not excellent on the old A7s, with some in low light or "problematic" backgrounds. It looks like a toy but works as a lens of size and especially significantly higher costs. Purchase recommended. Overall it deserves a 10 sent on January 06, 2020 |
 | Sigma 50-150mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: Fixed F2.8, sharpness even at f 2.8 at all focal lengths, lens hood, lens pouch bracket and leads supplied, stabilization 2 and a half stop, well built, fast and accurate autofocus Cons: Fragility least on my copy of the stabilization group, an important weight for long photo sessions or hiking in the mountains. Opinion: After nearly four years of almost exclusive use on my Canon Eos 7D in the halls photographing football games 5 and in a more sporadic for portraits can do a review of this view for APS-C in my opinion one of the best telephoto zoom lens not extreme in circulation. The lens is well built and conveys a feeling of strength, lens hood, tripod socket and lens bag door are part of the standard specification unlike for example the Canon that almost always do not offer the hood seems to be buy at disproportionate cost in my opinion. Even at full aperture the definition is very good in the middle and good at the edges, closing improves up to F8 above all at the edges, can stand up to very dense sensors such as the 7D. The blur is pleasantly mellow. Autofocus is fast and fairly accurate with the 7D in all modes, mine was correct for a slight back to -3 focus. The weight is considerable but it helps to hold the handle. The stabilizer is very efficient but at least for my original single6agrave; twice he can do it again. All in all I need to stop the movement of the subject with fast times, not to stabilize the eventual moved my hands. Perhaps the fact to keep it almost always active has accelerated its rupture. My judgment is very positive because I was able to get great shots, the zoom range is optimal in sports halls and is great even outside especially for portraits and more. It is no longer in production, perhaps because he had little market, but I think it is one of the best goals of its category for price performance. sent on December 27, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
