Reviews written by Lorenzor

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Lorenzor
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Lorenzor

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Lorenzor

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Canon EF 17-35mm f/2.8 L USM

Pros: build quality, sharpness, color, contrast, brightness. Opinion: Using this lens for several years for landscapes. Excellent sharpness and the yield on the corners (virtually equal to the center) to the most openings used for landscapes (f8 - f11 - f16). Excellent resistance to flare when compared to the same objectives focale..specialmente compared to 16-35 and 14-24 Nikon that make it difficult if not impossible backlighting. AC controlled and almost absent. Colors and excellent contrast. Good lens for night: a 2.8 allows you to not raise too the iso and get good exposure. Distorts a lot, but the landscape is not a problem ... it can become in the photography of architecture and interiors, but we know that for that there are specific lenses. The sharpness in 2.8 is not exceptional, as indeed all the lenses type this, better 24-70. At 35 mm, the sharpness is good but not comparable to the remaining focal unless af 11. I highly recommend this lens, capable of restoring good images even in the corners (also 16 mm) when used wisely. Before Di owned this lens 17-40 f 4 and well ... it's another story entirely.

Cons: Minor sharpness in the corners at f2.8, slight vignetting at 17mm.

Opinion: Using this lens for several years for reportage, interiors, landscapes and night. Colors and excellent contrast. Excellent yield with polarizing filter. Good sharpness at f2.8. Excellent sharpness and rendering the corners already f4. Good resistance to flare. Autofocus very fast. Finding used, it can be a good deal compared to similar currently produced lenses. I highly recommend this lens.

sent on January 27, 2014

Panasonic Lumix FZ200

Pros: Note: Aperture fixed at f / 2,8 for all focal lengths. (Not f / 2.8 to 4.5).

Cons: Sharpness up to 108 mm (600 mm equivalent) only discreet.

Opinion: Good compared to other Super Zoom Bridge in normal use, but not yet up to nature photography of fast moving animals. Electronic viewfinder is not quite sharp and clear. Very difficult "to follow and keep in focus" a moving animal. I was not very satisfied, especially considering the cost.

sent on December 17, 2013