|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Nazzareno74 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Nazzareno74  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Pros: Af precise and fast, held at all focal lengths, grade 'excellent images gia'da machine Cons: weight if we want to find something but it was granted Opinion: Purchased used by a user of the forum after many hesitations due more 'than anything else to the cost of the lens than to any real quality' optics to replace an economic Tamron than however has done its job. I tried last night to the arena for basketball and I was impressed by the quality 'of images already' in the car, the speed 'of AF that combined with my car makes' to look great without snagging, the Long has a little' sapped me arms to the weight but you get used soon. sent on January 16, 2017 |
 | Sigma 100-300mm f/4 DG EX HSM Pros: honest lens that works well, cost / quality ' Cons: Stabilizer if I have to name one Opinion: I used this lens for outdoor rugby and I found myself very well, the relationship between the quality 'and the cost and' excellent for those without high budget and does not want the original lenses, no problem back focus as sometimes it happens with Sigma lenses. I replaced it with Pompone the Canon 100-400 which for me seemed impossible at the beginning, two completely different lenses, both as yield as a cost but it depends on the portfolio and those 'interested sent on January 16, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
