|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Aloi Alessandro www.juzaphoto.com/p/AloiAlessandro  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Jupiter 9 - 85mm f/2 Pros: Construction, 15 blades, bokeh, quality / price, preset, clear 2.8 (a TA is in a bit soft) Cons: Only mf (but for portraiture is not absolutely a problem), ring aperture continues ... So you go to estimate the openings intermediate between those indicated, it is only used as well ... With all the attendant risks Opinion: Lens purchased for € 85 on ebay and I must admit to being very satisfied. rnVolevo try a 85 fixed with a good opening without spending too slow and this was the solution (version MC). rnPersonalmente not feel the lack of AF (of course it can not be used at events or with moving subjects continuously) using only for portrait and some macro (with extension tubes) .rnLa construction is absurd (now lenses with a strength so no longer build them) ... I think I fell to the ground would make quite a mark on the floor :-) rnConsigliatissimo to those who want to try a 85 quality (optically has nothing to envy to the modern optical ... It is then from the point of view construction is a tank) on the cheap .... Rating 9/10 sent on June 09, 2015 |
 | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: Build quality, good sharpness at RT, fixed aperture to F / 2.8, quality / price ratio Cons: Quality of the lens hood, possible problems of back / front focus (QA sigma) Opinion: After a bit 'of reflections I bought this lens because I needed a goal with a good focal range (from "almost" all do) with a fixed aperture of f / 2.8.rnChe say ... Excellent lens with good sharpness at TA It reaches its maximum between f / 4 and f / 5.6 (bokeh is quite pleasant and harmonious). rnLo stabilizer works well and HSM is fast (to some hesitation in low light) ... From online review many specimens manifest problems of front / back focus and are therefore sent to care for the calibration (Milan) but, fortunately, the He had no problem. rnPer else I can say that aesthetically the lens is very solid and transmits quality (plastics are well done and look very resistant) ... In my opinion the value for money is great (more than all his rivals ... Slight difference with the Canon 17-55 ... but the latter costs almost twice) .rnvoto 8.5 / 10 (for the high possibility of having a model to be calibrated) rnrn sent on May 17, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
