|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Marcobrasil www.juzaphoto.com/p/Marcobrasil  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS R6 Pros: Ergonomics, currently the price Cons: the colors ! the dominant ! the white balance (in Av) where is the Canon red ? Opinion: It's a very praised camera but for me rather disappointing, I had two, one resold immediately to finance the purchase of the R5 (another world) the other remained on my rump because at current prices unfortunately it is not worth reselling, I immediately quarreled with the colors that it churns out in jpeg, washed out, devoid of bite and contrast with a yellowish patina on the whole frame as for the R8 and the RP, with various dominants to try to remedy but with extreme difficulty in post and above all does not seem to know where the Canon red is! Then for heaven's sake the "wizards" of post production will say that blah blah blah but if one doesn't want to bang in post production it's better to look for something else, even in Canon of course (the R5 first of all but also simply the R which is the most underrated of the ML R series) "someone" has spread the rumor that Canon in the R6 had put the sensor of the 1DX Mark III but have you ever used the flagship? They are simply incomparable objects from all points of view! More likely that the sensor derives from that of the 6D... On the video side, ok ok for 4K at 60 fps with a minimum crop but it overheats and doesn't even have the ALL-I codecs (instead the R has it) and the firmware addition of the Canon Log 3 has introduced a lot of digital noise at high iso especially in the shadows ... but you know how to chase dynamic range at all costs is the new senseless mantra! sent on August 22, 2025 |
 | Canon RF 85mm f/2 Macro IS STM Pros: Sharp Fairly Light Compact Bright Macro Stabilized Well-Built Cons: The price and lack of a standard lens hood Opinion: I come from a Canon EOS Reflex analog system obviously film (EOS 3 & EOS 33) and then Digital Reflex (all the 5D series and a 1D III apsH) and of course I have, I have had or at least I have tried almost all the lenses of the Canon EF kit with the exception of the long telephoto over 300mm that cost and cost as much as a car, so once I switched to mirrorless, and I must confess more for video functions than for photography, where 5D were and still are more than enough for everything, I went through many doubts and reflections as well as months of study to begin to decide to switch or at least to combine EF lenses with RF lenses and the reasons are many: starting with the really and absolutely exaggerated cost especially for the L series but also for the useless overlapping of focal lengths for those like me who already have the EF equivalents ... then slowly I said to myself: come on, let's try! and of course I started from the so-called RF for "poor" or STMs which then not always and not all are completely for poor given the prices... but anyway I must confess that a world has opened up to me... Canon is a company that sometimes really you off, you would beat it up and change brands without batting an eyelid and yet... other times you realize that he brings out things that many people do not initially appreciate, including me, because they simply do not understand them! I mention the Canon EOS R for me absolutely underestimated only because of the limitations of the video sector ... and clearly superior on the photographic side, for example compared to a much-praised R6 (but do you really believe that Canon may have put the sensor of the 1DX Mark III in the R6?) but with general contrast, colors and dominants often unmanageable and indigestible... However, in order not to dwell too much I will try to summarize: I find the triad RF 24/35/85 STM IS absolutely at least equal if not superior to the corresponding EF usm series NOT L series unfortunately I cannot say the same thing about the RF 16mm and the RF 50mm stm too plasticky and whose only undoubted merit is the lightness and small size ... finally, a separate mention deserves the pancake RF 28mm f/2.8 STM very sharp, very light and tiny brilliant lens that I hope will soon be joined by at least an identical RF 40mm F2.8 sent on August 21, 2025 |
 | Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Pros: Sharp, Lightweight, Compact, Bright, Macro, Stabilized, Well-Built Cons: The price: the lack of a standard lens hood Opinion: I come from a Canon EOS Reflex analog system obviously film (EOS 3 & EOS 33) and then Digital Reflex (all the 5D series and a 1D III apsH) and of course I have, I have had or at least I have tried almost all the lenses of the Canon EF kit with the exception of the long telephoto over 300mm that cost and cost as much as a car, so once I switched to mirrorless, and I must confess more for video functions than for photography, where 5D were and still are more than enough for everything, I went through many doubts and reflections as well as months of study to begin to decide to switch or at least to combine EF lenses with RF lenses and the reasons are many: starting with the really and absolutely exaggerated cost especially for the L series but also for the useless overlapping of focal lengths for those like me who already have the EF equivalents ... then slowly I said to myself: come on, let's try! and of course I started from the so-called RF for "poor" or STMs which then not always and not all are completely for poor given the prices... but anyway I must confess that a world has opened up to me... Canon is a company that sometimes really you off, you would beat it up and change brands without batting an eyelid and yet... other times you realize that he brings out things that many people do not initially appreciate, including me, because they simply do not understand them! I mention the Canon EOS R for me absolutely underestimated only because of the limitations of the video sector ... and clearly superior on the photographic side, for example compared to a much-praised R6 (but do you really believe that Canon may have put the sensor of the 1DX Mark III in the R6?) but with general contrast, colors and dominants often unmanageable and indigestible... However, in order not to dwell too much I will try to summarize: I find the triad RF 24/35/85 STM IS absolutely at least equal if not superior to the corresponding EF usm series NOT L series unfortunately I cannot say the same thing about the RF 16mm and the RF 50mm stm too plasticky and whose only undoubted merit is the lightness and small size ... finally, a separate mention deserves the pancake RF 28mm f/2.8 STM very sharp, very light and tiny brilliant lens that I hope will soon be joined by at least an identical RF 40mm F2.8 sent on August 21, 2025 |
 | Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Pros: Sharp, Lightweight, Compact, Bright, Macro, Stabilized, Well-Built Cons: The price The lack of the standard lens hood Opinion: I come from a Canon EOS Reflex analog system obviously film (EOS 3 & EOS 33) and then Digital Reflex (all the 5D series and a 1D III apsH) and of course I have, I have had or at least I have tried almost all the lenses of the Canon EF kit with the exception of the long telephoto over 300mm that cost and cost as much as a car, so once I switched to mirrorless, and I must confess more for video functions than for photography, where 5D were and still are more than enough for everything, I went through many doubts and reflections as well as months of study to begin to decide to switch or at least to combine EF lenses with RF lenses and the reasons are many: starting with the really and absolutely exaggerated cost especially for the L series but also for the useless overlapping of focal lengths for those like me who already have the EF equivalents ... then slowly I said to myself: come on, let's try! and of course I started from the so-called RF for "poor" or STMs which then not always and not all are completely for poor given the prices... but anyway I must confess that a world has opened up to me... Canon is a company that sometimes really you off, you would beat it up and change brands without batting an eyelid and yet... other times you realize that he brings out things that many people do not initially appreciate, including me, because they simply do not understand them! I mention the Canon EOS R for me absolutely underestimated only because of the limitations of the video sector ... and clearly superior on the photographic side, for example compared to a much-praised R6 (but do you really believe that Canon may have put the sensor of the 1DX Mark III in the R6?) but with general contrast, colors and dominants often unmanageable and indigestible... However, in order not to dwell too much I will try to summarize: I find the triad RF 24/35/85 STM IS absolutely at least equal if not superior to the corresponding EF usm series NOT L series unfortunately I cannot say the same thing about the RF 16mm and the RF 50mm stm too plasticky and whose only undoubted merit is the lightness and small size ... finally, a separate mention deserves the pancake RF 28mm f/2.8 STM very sharp, very light and tiny brilliant lens that I hope will soon be joined by at least an identical RF 40mm F2.8 sent on August 21, 2025 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
