|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Mich3200 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Mich3200  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S DX 40mm f/2.8 G Micro Pros: Sharpness, focus distance, lightness, brightness, value for money. Cons: Focus slow, difficult and a bit noisy, operating distance. Opinion: A good lens for macrophotography, despite the absence of ED lenses. The sharpness is delicious, the brightness is good and the fuzzy soft. It allows you to focus already at 16 and broken cm, great value that turns into a defect when you are having to shoot (the focal point is 40 mm and the ratio 1:1) exactly inside the flower, but not close, right inside! The focus is accurate, really, however, having to shoot so close to the subject (obviously applies to macrophotography) at large aperture the lens requires the support of the tripod... The focus is slow, because first it tries to focus close then it starts probing toward infinity. I would recommend it as a first macro lens. It's worth exactly the price. sent on July 20, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 G VR II Pros: Lightness, cheapness, reduced filter dimensions, discreet sharpness, silent focus. Cons: Fears the flare, plasticous, limited excursion, already at 30 mm becomes very dark. Opinion: I recommend it to anyone to start, as advice just as not hesitate to change it after the first years of photography: it will show its limits. Anyway, it's a little handyman not to be crushed. You notice the lack of lenses ED (beginners do not take it into account!); In short, without infamy and without praise: To start is perfect! sent on July 19, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
